General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

December 2010 Camaro Sales Production Figures Ends Mustang’s 23 Year Sales Reign

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 06:03 PM
  #81  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cdynaco
oops...






Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 06:30 PM
  #82  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by MARZ



"why I oughta..."
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2011 | 08:01 PM
  #83  
eric n's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 27, 2004
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 2
From: Bakersfield, CA
Originally Posted by 2011GB/CS
I still don't understand how people can get past the Gawd awful interior of the Slowmaro. That alone would deter me from buying one.
I agree that the interior of the Camaro are horrible. I find the mustang to be a superior car in pretty much every aspect. That said, I hate it on the GM sites when they use words like crapstang. It's hardly cleaver. I generally suspect a 13 year old is responsible. I kind of feel the same way about Slowmaro. The Camaro is no where near slow. It's a pretty **** impressive AMERICAN MUSCLE CAR. If the 2011 mustang wasn't around it would be the top muscle car by a chunk.

Obviously if you want to call a car that is at most marginally slower than the mustang in pretty much all aspects slow, you can. They can call a car which is superior and has won EVERY COMPARISON TEST... crap. Both are overlooking the obvious awesomeness of some good old fashion American *** Kickers. Both are amazing cars. I'll take mine with a BLUE OVAL PLEASE!
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 07:07 AM
  #84  
karman's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2006
Posts: 3,904
Likes: 32
Wink

Originally Posted by eric n
I agree that the interior of the Camaro are horrible. I find the mustang to be a superior car in pretty much every aspect. That said, I hate it on the GM sites when they use words like crapstang. It's hardly cleaver. I generally suspect a 13 year old is responsible. I kind of feel the same way about Slowmaro. The Camaro is no where near slow. It's a pretty **** impressive AMERICAN MUSCLE CAR. If the 2011 mustang wasn't around it would be the top muscle car by a chunk.

Obviously if you want to call a car that is at most marginally slower than the mustang in pretty much all aspects slow, you can. They can call a car which is superior and has won EVERY COMPARISON TEST... crap. Both are overlooking the obvious awesomeness of some good old fashion American *** Kickers. Both are amazing cars. I'll take mine with a BLUE OVAL PLEASE!
Well Said Sir.
I don't hate the Camaro.
I just wouldn't buy the new one or the previous generation.
Reply
Old Jan 8, 2011 | 07:22 AM
  #85  
2011GB/CS's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 4, 2010
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by eric n
I agree that the interior of the Camaro are horrible. I find the mustang to be a superior car in pretty much every aspect. That said, I hate it on the GM sites when they use words like crapstang. It's hardly cleaver. I generally suspect a 13 year old is responsible. I kind of feel the same way about Slowmaro. The Camaro is no where near slow. It's a pretty **** impressive AMERICAN MUSCLE CAR. If the 2011 mustang wasn't around it would be the top muscle car by a chunk.

Obviously if you want to call a car that is at most marginally slower than the mustang in pretty much all aspects slow, you can. They can call a car which is superior and has won EVERY COMPARISON TEST... crap. Both are overlooking the obvious awesomeness of some good old fashion American *** Kickers. Both are amazing cars. I'll take mine with a BLUE OVAL PLEASE!
Its just a "Figure of Speech" man, Relax! I just figured it would add some humor to this thread. I didn't think I would be criticized for it. I know that the Camaro is not slow. I actually considered buying one if it hadn't been for the interior. I like all Muscle cars. I even have one from GM. That being one of the best Muscle cars of the 80's...An 87 Grand National.
Reply
Old Jan 9, 2011 | 01:00 AM
  #86  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Originally Posted by karman
Well Said Sir.
I don't hate the Camaro.
I just wouldn't buy the new one or the previous generation.
Only got love for the 1st gen F-body. Camaro of 2010? Try again!

As far as liking other manufacturer's products - I also like the Turbo Regals/T-Types/GNs. Would have bought one of those if I didn't find my Mustang first. And unlike the Camaro, the interior of this car was OK compared to other cars of its time - like the 3rd gen F-bodies.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2011 | 03:05 PM
  #87  
Killa-B's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: August 24, 2010
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
From: Middle Tennessee
Originally Posted by 2011GB/CS
Its just a "Figure of Speech" man, Relax! I just figured it would add some humor to this thread. I didn't think I would be criticized for it. I know that the Camaro is not slow. I actually considered buying one if it hadn't been for the interior. I like all Muscle cars. I even have one from GM. That being one of the best Muscle cars of the 80's...An 87 Grand National.
I call them Slowmaro's too, it is just a figure of speech.

I also have an 87 GN with 26K miles on it. Well its not mine exactly, its my dad's, he bought it brand new. However my garage is a lot bigger than his so I keep it safe
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tukatz
Road Trips
23
Oct 13, 2023 10:01 AM
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
Nov 3, 2022 08:50 PM
Mackitude
2010-2014 Mustang
6
Aug 13, 2015 01:05 PM
Ecostang
Introductions
5
Jul 11, 2015 09:06 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:30 AM.