Corvette C7
#42
Needs to be more Astony
I'm going to trust the gt5 version over those other ones. Not saying that its 100% certain that it will have round tail lights, but those mules do have round taillights and they have camo over them, so if they are fake versions of the tail lights than why camo them?
So all in all I'm willing to bet the real car does have round tail lights.
So all in all I'm willing to bet the real car does have round tail lights.
#43
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#44
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm going to trust the gt5 version over those other ones. Not saying that its 100% certain that it will have round tail lights, but those mules do have round taillights and they have camo over them, so if they are fake versions of the tail lights than why camo them?
So all in all I'm willing to bet the real car does have round tail lights.
So all in all I'm willing to bet the real car does have round tail lights.
#46
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This just has me shaking my head. Last gen, they went super conservative with a (barely) evolutionary design and defended it as "iconic" when people complained it hadn't come far enough. Fine, ok, if that works it works.
But what defense will they offer for ripping of Nissan's design language? It sure isn't Iconic, at least not for Chevy!
But what defense will they offer for ripping of Nissan's design language? It sure isn't Iconic, at least not for Chevy!
#47
MOTM Committee Member
This just has me shaking my head. Last gen, they went super conservative with a (barely) evolutionary design and defended it as "iconic" when people complained it hadn't come far enough. Fine, ok, if that works it works.
But what defense will they offer for ripping of Nissan's design language? It sure isn't Iconic, at least not for Chevy!
But what defense will they offer for ripping of Nissan's design language? It sure isn't Iconic, at least not for Chevy!
I see 2010 camaro + Nissan GT-R
#48
Anything without a clamshell split rear window at this point is just stupid. They could sell one to every Corvette owner in existence past and present if they had done the right thing. ****ing morons. They deserve what they get from this.
#49
Needs to be more Astony
quoted for truth, if they made that GTR looking car but had the split rear window, everyone would have forgave them over the rest of the car.
#50
GTR Member
Not seen this rendering before (it's from a GM video, according to the link) but I can only hope the C7 looks this good!
http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewd...ds-to-succeed/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewd...ds-to-succeed/
#51
Member
Join Date: January 6, 2013
Location: caledonia il
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree. The car is quite attractive minus the rear end! Chevy must keep the vette completely different looking then the rest of the line. This rear end just screams camaro! It needs round tail lights. However, i imagine if this rendering makes production, it will do well. There is much enthusiasm about this styling among the vette croud.
#58
FR500 Member
Join Date: December 9, 2011
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
Mix of ferarri and the new viper on the front, gtr lines on the body, and a fat square *** that comes from a drunk night with the camaro. How original!!! I like corvettes and im all about being modern but this just hit so many wrong nails IMO
#59
MOTM Committee Member