General Vehicle Discussion/News Non-Mustang Vehicle Chat, Other Makes

2015 SRT Barracuda

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9/22/12 | 07:06 PM
  #61  
lalayla's Avatar
Calgon Take Me Away!
 
Joined: April 1, 2011
Posts: 10,829
Likes: 5
From: Florida
Originally Posted by 11SHELBYGT500

Feeling better today, princess? :I
Awww princess lol

I'm alright. About the same.
Old 9/22/12 | 09:44 PM
  #62  
AlsCobra's Avatar
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 16,852
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue

Darn shame how GM paid tribute to a Pontiac icon GTO by making that embarrassing, ugly remake and sticking the letters GTO on the side.
The GTO was a big *** slow tank. Maybe they should have called it a Tempest but it hardly insulted the GTO name. and btw: the new GTO interior was beautiful and the power train and drivetrain were fantastic.
Old 9/22/12 | 10:04 PM
  #63  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,637
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Originally Posted by AlsCobra
btw: the new GTO interior was beautiful and the power train and drivetrain were fantastic.
And despite all that, GTO still failed in the USA ...
Old 9/22/12 | 10:17 PM
  #64  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
[quote="AlsCobra"]

The GTO was a big *** slow tank. Maybe they should have called it a Tempest but it hardly insulted the GTO name. and btw: the new GTO interior was beautiful and the power train and drivetrain were fantastic.[/quote

It's not about speed. Its about the look brother. The GTO back in day was smooth and sexy looking. That piece of $hit Pontiac made a few years back looked horrible and that's why the GTO sales sucked. GM should of made a retro GTO with the power and performance. Instead they made bubble looking turd and slapped the letters GTO on the side. Rubbish. GM really missed the boat on redesigning the GTO.

Just like Ford did years ago when they remade the Ford Thunderbird. What an injustice that was to the Thunderbird when they produced that round, ugly turd that sold next to nothing.

Last edited by 2011 Kona Blue; 9/22/12 at 10:27 PM.
Old 9/23/12 | 07:50 AM
  #65  
UOP Shadow's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 3, 2012
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 14
Maybe the reason GM thought the GTO would be a success is because if the Impala SS. It was big and bland looking. Didn't they sell a truckload of them?
Old 9/23/12 | 08:02 AM
  #66  
AlsCobra's Avatar
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 16,852
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by UOP Shadow
Maybe the reason GM thought the GTO would be a success is because if the Impala SS. It was big and bland looking. Didn't they sell a truckload of them?
Not sure but I owned two of them. Lol. A 95 & 96. The absolute greatest car I've ever had to drive. Not fast but was fantastic to travel in. And I'm anxiously waiting to see what the Chevrolet SS will look like when it comes out. Chevy, Ford, I really don't give a rats ***. I'm buying the better vehicle. I didn't include Dodge because they build nice looking garbage.
Old 9/23/12 | 08:15 AM
  #67  
KeavDog's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2012
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
I own an 09 Charger RT and the 2011 srt 392 Challenger (along with my badass boss)
As a dodge owner and former fan all I can say is they are heading down a direction that will only **** off enthusiasts. I bought the boss because you can't tune a 2011+ charger/challenger. They win on curb appeal and styling but absolutely fail in every way on supporting any form of racing/performance enthusiast.
Their tag line should be - Dodge, we're third and proud of it!

Love my charger. two doors would look better for sure, but the challenger is just as much a heavy pig so don't see that it matters performance wise. I've got four doors running 11.79 in the 1/4 and I still tote my familly around in it.

And as far as recycling names... how about the dart?


If I had to guess, the cuda will slight body changes from the challenger, mostly gills and grills.
Old 9/23/12 | 10:42 AM
  #68  
Von Bek's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 22, 2006
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue
The GTO failed because it was a ugly a$$ bubble looking piece that was a sad excuse for the GTO. GM should of been ashamed to insult the GTO name by placing the emblem GTO on that ugly a$$ vehicle. Shame on GM for insulting the historic GTO by bringing back such a horrible looking piece. I don't care how fast the newer GTO was and is, its horrible and looks like junk.
I don't know if I'd go so far as to call it ugly. Boring as all get out, yeah, but not ugly. Looked like a bigger Cavalier (or whatever small bubble car they were pushing at that time). But holy crap was that thing fun to drive, lol.
Old 9/23/12 | 11:59 AM
  #69  
jacostang's Avatar
 
Joined: January 27, 2006
Posts: 3,613
Likes: 7
From: Mesa, AZ
Originally Posted by cntchds
I feel like using a nameplate like that and not going with a retro design is a mistake. There is no reason they couldn't call that something else that doesn't tie in with a car it has no similarities to.
10000% Agree, Leave the Cuda alone... We bought our SRT8 Challenger because it was so friggen sexy, a bit heavy yes but so was Marilyn Monroe..
Old 9/23/12 | 07:43 PM
  #70  
justindo's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 12, 2010
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
From: Southern California
It's a nice enough looking car, but it doesn't say 'Cuda to me like the modern Challenger says Challenger. The back is too much like a Taurus too. I bought my Challenger R/T Classic mainly for its looks. I don't think I'll be buying this unless it outperforms and undercuts the price of the upcoming Mustang. (I doubt it will do either of these.)

As for the modern GTO, while it was somewhat "boring" design, I still think it's an attractive, sleeper car (sans the tacky spoiler and hood scoops) that performs well with a nice interior. Of course over-designed and over-the-top looks (ala Camaro) seem to be what many people want in this segment. I'm looking forward to the new "boring" Chevrolet SS, which should be quite the sleeper.
Old 9/23/12 | 08:00 PM
  #71  
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by justindo
It's a nice enough looking car, but it doesn't say 'Cuda to me like the modern Challenger says Challenger. The back is too much like a Taurus too. I bought my Challenger R/T Classic mainly for its looks. I don't think I'll be buying this unless it outperforms and undercuts the price of the upcoming Mustang. (I doubt it will do either of these.)

As for the modern GTO, while it was somewhat "boring" design, I still think it's an attractive, sleeper car (sans the tacky spoiler and hood scoops) that performs well with a nice interior. Of course over-designed and over-the-top looks (ala Camaro) seem to be what many people want in this segment. I'm looking forward to the new "boring" Chevrolet SS, which should be quite the sleeper.
One can make a turd, fast. It's still a turd. The modern GTO is a fast, ugly a$$ car and that's why the sales numbers for it were horrible.
Old 9/23/12 | 08:12 PM
  #72  
AlsCobra's Avatar
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 16,852
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue

One can make a turd, fast. It's still a turd. The modern GTO is a fast, ugly a$$ car and that's why the sales numbers for it were horrible.
Well I wouldn't call it ugly. I give her about a 5 in looks and a 7 overall. But it's still a cool car and is making a very big comeback. People are really hunting for them right now. Just took a whole to get over the bland look of it. I can respect any cool car despite looks or power. Take the Caterham for instance. I will take this ugly little monster over a new mustang GT any day.
Attached Images  
Old 9/23/12 | 08:50 PM
  #73  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,637
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
I can't remember when was the last time I saw 2004-2006 GTO on the streets.

I'm pretty sure I saw more classic GTOs than modern ones.
Old 9/23/12 | 09:05 PM
  #74  
shurtual86's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: December 16, 2011
Posts: 4,657
Likes: 1
From: Minnesota
I see 04-06 GTOs all the time in the past year or so, heck my brother-in-law has one.
Old 9/25/12 | 12:42 AM
  #75  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
I could live with a version of that rendering of the Barracuda. Just change up the front end a little bit. Make it more evocative of the 2nd-gen to match the tail light treatment. But then again, I've always preferred the Barracuda over the Challenger.
It definitely has to be smaller and lighter than the current Challenger to better compete with the upcoming Mustang and Camaro.
Old 9/25/12 | 02:00 AM
  #76  
KeavDog's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2012
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Escondido, CA
Well if they make it 400 lbs lighter, add a 6.2l supercharged hemi and unlock the PCM I'd look at it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cozyp828
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
11
12/13/17 05:53 PM
cozyp828
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
19
4/18/16 09:46 PM
yabutt
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
10
10/23/15 01:05 PM
CoyotePremium13
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
11
10/7/15 07:17 PM



Quick Reply: 2015 SRT Barracuda



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 PM.