2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}
View Poll Results: Should clones be discriminated against?
Yes
40
31.01%
No
63
48.84%
I don't care
26
20.16%
Voters: 129. You may not vote on this poll

Why the clone hate?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/21/06, 01:44 PM
  #81  
Cobra R Member
 
Rebel73's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 22, 2005
Location: Lost Angels
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AFBLUE
So all I have to do is put "II" after the "COBRA" and I'm ok?

05-07 GTs are just as fast (if not faster than) as 94-01 cobras, 03-04 Mach 1s, and 01 Bullitts, so cobra/Mach 1/Bullitt emblems are ok to use if I clone one of these?

05-07 GTs are already faster than the original GT-350s, GT-500s, Mach 1s, Boss 302s, 68 390 used in Bullitt etc. so putting these emblems are ok too?

Just playing devil's advocate.
Although he didn't specify, I think we can infer that we are referring to vehicles of the same generation. In this case, the 05+ models.
Old 12/21/06, 01:47 PM
  #82  
Cobra R Member
 
Rebel73's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 22, 2005
Location: Lost Angels
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nonstopred
cant deny it, thats why im okay with cloning

im 16, theres some limit to what i can get.. had gt body kit on order. cancelled though.(risk of scratches not worth it)

love the look of the gt, just wasnt in the cards.

I love my car more than anything, and when my dad came to me hey you want that mustang, aaa a yehh!!

You understand now dont you?
hey, it's cool, you have a better car than I did at 16. A V6 Stang is not a bad first car at all. Being as young as you are, I can understand the insurance issue. I am twice your age with a clean record (amazingly enough), so the insurance is not really an issue. My point is let's not rag on each other for choosing what we did, whether V6 or GT. We all have our reasons.

Again, I got no issue with cloning, but if I made up my GT to look like a GT500, and someday a REAL GT500 called me on it, I think I'd be pretty embarrassed.
Old 12/21/06, 02:16 PM
  #83  
Member
 
03fridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 26, 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The general thought from all the car brands is that its not ok to pass off a clone as the real thing. Lets face it though, not every one can afford the real car in which they are cloning. Especially with dealer adjusted fair market values, or the Barrett Jackson auction prices. If you think about it there are more Hemi powered cars on the road today then were ever produced "back in the day". No one ever seems to bash a hemi clone. I'm sure the same could be said about Yenko Camaro's or any of the others. There is nothing wrong with modifying or cloning a car as long as you don't pass it off as the real thing. One thing I've learned in all my car owning days is that outside of the Mopar 100 percent correct restoration guys, Mustang owners are the most strict bunch of guys when it comes to modifications. If the modifications aren't drag race inspired or "group approved" you get flamed. I currently own an 05 GT, which is the third mustang I've owned, and am thinking about adding some 07 GT500 pieces, if not a making it a clone, or possibly some Foose stuff, and do expect to get flamed. Just the nature of the beast when you step "outside-the-box" and build a clone. I had an 03 Mach 1 which I put a cobra IRS in (I'm a road racer) and you would've thought that I had just killed someone with all the hate comments and flames thrown just because I thought outside the drag racer box. Personally I like the cars where the owners have thought outside the box and have tastefully cloned or modded their cars to make them a little different than the "cookie cutters" and show them for what they are; a clone. Sorry if this offends any one, if so, so be it. If you want to flame me that's cool too.
Old 12/21/06, 03:18 PM
  #84  
Team Mustang Source
 
hiznherponies's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 3, 2004
Location: Beautiful New Hampshire!!!
Posts: 840
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
GT 350, your car sounds nice!!! I think you stole my idea!!!! LOL!!! Post some pics of it when you can!!!

03fridge, you are right about most of us stangers not "thinking outside the box" but there are some of us (me, included) that think just like you and are tired of seeing all of the cookie-cutter stangs running around!!! When I can afford it, mine will definately be different!! I've got several ideas running around in my head, some of them including so-called "clone" parts, but some in the GT 350 flavor, too!!!
Old 12/22/06, 07:15 AM
  #85  
Bullitt Member
 
GT_350's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 28, 2006
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile Better Picture of my almost done clone '67 GT 350













After the holidays I'll be putting on the final cosmedic stuff; Shelby Badges, and blue GT 350 rocker stripes.
Old 12/22/06, 08:25 AM
  #86  
Bullitt Member
 
BurntPony's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 24, 2005
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Heres a trivia question:

What was the base engine/carb/tranny that the 68 GT/CS was equiped with?

Hint: There are two known to exist.
Old 12/22/06, 09:19 AM
  #87  
Member
 
RichinMO's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
grille?

GT 350 - can I ask you where you got that grille with the fogs in the middle? Looks really well made, is it custom or aftermarket?
Old 12/22/06, 10:25 AM
  #88  
Member
 
03fridge's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 26, 2006
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What was the base engine/carb/tranny that the 68 GT/CS was equiped with?


200ci 6 cylinder, 1 barrel carb and a 3 speed trans.
Old 12/22/06, 10:36 AM
  #89  
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
AFBLUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
So far 71% don't care or are against discriminating against "cloning".

I may start another poll asking what you consider to be "acceptable" modifications. Let me think about how to word it.
Old 12/22/06, 11:49 AM
  #90  
GT Member
 
samckernan's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 24, 2005
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2005sonicBOOST
What's a mach 5

Speed Racer drove the Mach5, what rock have you been under. Just kidding with you dude.
Attached Images  
Old 12/22/06, 12:25 PM
  #91  
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
AFBLUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Who's Speed Racer?




















Old 12/22/06, 01:38 PM
  #92  
Bullitt Member
 
BurntPony's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 24, 2005
Posts: 306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03fridge
What was the base engine/carb/tranny that the 68 GT/CS was equiped with?


200ci 6 cylinder, 1 barrel carb and a 3 speed trans.
That is correct. My point, all clones arent about high performance cars.
Old 12/22/06, 01:49 PM
  #93  
Member
 
RobDurham's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2006
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AFBLUE
Ah, my favorite subject to comment on.

I don't really care what anyone does to their car. I will have opinions on what they have done, but unless they are positive, I generally keep them to myself.
There are things I won't do to my car, but if others do it, Fine. Live and let live.
Bottom line is there is nothing we can do about those that make clones and there nothing we can do about those that slam "cloners".

Freedom to do what you want and say what you want.
I agree 100%!

If you want to se my combination of different parts check it out here http://forums.bradbarnett.net/showthread.php?t=57785




Old 12/22/06, 03:05 PM
  #94  
Dethroned Nascar Guru
 
AFBLUE's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,060
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by AFBLUE
I may start another poll asking what you consider to be "acceptable" modifications. Let me think about how to word it.
Ok, I did my best to capture the different opinions in this thread and came up with a poll.
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/showthread.php?t=58003

Please go there and share your thoughts.
Old 12/22/06, 04:49 PM
  #95  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
max2000jp's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 2, 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,594
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think clones are stupid in most cases. Putting non-specific badges on a car is a ricer move. Might as well buy a GT-R badge at Autozone. I am totally against people putting GT500 badges on a regular Mustang. Now adding parts here and there, such as the GT rear bumper to a V6 or GT500 rear bumper to a GT is fine.
Old 12/22/06, 09:32 PM
  #96  
Bullitt Member
 
mustangdaren's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 21, 2005
Location: Hildebran, NC
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I tend to not like clones and I have a Saleen clone, that's pretty messed up, but what do you do if you want a 89 Saleen coupe in Med. Shadow Blue when they only made one of them which belonged to the VP of sales of Saleen, you build a clone. All I have left is the five lug conversion and Stern wheels to have it complete. I may be considered a poser by some but I am honest to anyone who ask if the car is real and if the real Saleen would happen to line up beside me at a stoplight, all they would see is taillights in a race. To be honest I would rather see someone clone a car and customize it than to see them hack up an original.
Old 12/23/06, 02:14 AM
  #97  
Cobra R Member
 
Poco's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 7, 2006
Posts: 1,707
Received 23 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by BurntPony
That is correct. My point, all clones arent about high performance cars.
In the early 70's even some the SS Chevies started to run 2 barrel carbs on ther small block....darn the embargo.One car I came across was a loaded 66'Impala SS with a six cyl. w/air,rag top,variable heater control,cruize,power windows the works.I even had two different 64' SS Chevies Impalas with 3 on the trees and no provision for the auto or four speed in the console.I had some explaining to do and was severly accused of cloning these cars...but I had proof to back up they weren't clones.One of my favorites that I had was a 340HP 409 coupe with three on the tree.I had the window sticker on the car..no proof needed.

The 64'SS had a 300HP 327c.it had an odd ball three on the tree combo.I owned this ride back in 86'.
Attached Images  
Old 12/23/06, 02:21 AM
  #98  
GT Member
 
jenks's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 6, 2006
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is nothing wrong with using Shelby,Roush, and Saleen parts just don't claim your car is something it's not. If i did a Shelby conversion i would leave off the cobra emlems because it's not a GT500, but nothing wrong with having the styling of one.
Old 12/24/06, 09:50 AM
  #99  
Bullitt Member
 
shwaco1967's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 21, 2006
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by metroplex
what about a V8 pretending to be a V6?
The ultimate sleeper
Old 12/24/06, 11:29 AM
  #100  
FR500 Member
 
hi5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 15, 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What if the "clone" actually blows away the original's performance? Would the haters have a problem with that? I wouldn't - unless the "clo(w)ner" tries to pass it off as the genuine article. In fact, I would just love to see someone make a, oh let's say a GT500, clone that can beat the real thing done for the same price or less! (You know they're out there! ) So clone away, people.


Quick Reply: Why the clone hate?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 AM.