2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Which upgrade next?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/30/15, 08:06 AM
  #21  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
Before I supercharged i modded in this order and was very happy: 2007 GT with 3.31s and 5M 1. CAI and 93 race tune 2. 4.10 gears 3. Axle backs 4. Kooks LT headers with both a catted x and off-road x pipe and retune The headers did make a difference. I didn't bother with throttle body and even though I'm now pushing 479rwhp I still have the stock throttle body. There were just too many posts and complaints of problems from people that switched to the BBK throttle body during the time. The FRPP is a very nice piece but without cams and headers I personally don't feel it's necessary.
your making 479rwhp with intake, tune, and exhaust?
Old 3/30/15, 08:07 AM
  #22  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
Before I supercharged i modded in this order and was very happy: 2007 GT with 3.31s and 5M 1. CAI and 93 race tune 2. 4.10 gears 3. Axle backs 4. Kooks LT headers with both a catted x and off-road x pipe and retune The headers did make a difference. I didn't bother with throttle body and even though I'm now pushing 479rwhp I still have the stock throttle body. There were just too many posts and complaints of problems from people that switched to the BBK throttle body during the time. The FRPP is a very nice piece but without cams and headers I personally don't feel it's necessary.
oh sorry didn't see the before I supercharged part lol
Old 3/30/15, 08:16 AM
  #23  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Paris MkVI's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 18, 2004
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,146
Received 114 Likes on 84 Posts
Originally Posted by lowblustang00
The second intake valve opens up after a specific set of RPM and full throttle, along with the charge motion plates.
I think the tip-over point is at 3500rpm, or very close to that.
Old 3/30/15, 10:47 AM
  #24  
Cobra Member
 
lowblustang00's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 19, 2005
Location: Central Alabama
Posts: 1,100
Received 18 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Paris MkVI
I think the tip-over point is at 3500rpm, or very close to that.
That feels about right. Is usually around there that I feel a little more ooomf coming out of the old girl. :-)
Old 3/30/15, 09:09 PM
  #25  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,914
Received 1,983 Likes on 1,607 Posts
I pretty much still have the stock cats and H-pipe on my 2006 GT along with my Saleen S/C running at 7.5 boost with a 3.6" pulley..

Being that my car has been lowered by 1.4" in the front and 1.2" in the rear, I'm concerned that if I upgrade to LT headers ? that I'll end up bottoming out and I will not waste my time and money on shorty headers as they provide no real difference over the stock manifolds and H-pipe, so my only other option would be to upgrade to an off road X or maybe even a Mac Prochamber and find out if that may do the trick ? If not, then I'll just have to live with the stock exhaust

Last edited by m05fastbackGT; 3/30/15 at 09:47 PM.
Old 3/30/15, 09:50 PM
  #26  
Member
Thread Starter
 
sleeperstang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2015
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by m05fastbackGT
I pretty much still have the stock cats and H-pipe on my 2006 GT along with my Saleen S/C running at 7.5 boost with a 3.6" pulley.. Being that my car has been lowered by 1.4" in the front and 1.2" in the rear, I'm concerned that if I upgrade to LT headers ? that I'll end up bottoming out and I will not waste my time and money on shorty headers as they provide no real difference over the stock manifolds and H-pipe, so my only other option would be to upgrade to an off road X or maybe even a Mac Prochamber and find out if that may do the trick ? If not, then I'll just have to live with the stock exhaust
Ya I was thinking about lowering my car but I'm kinda glad I haven't yet.
Old 3/30/15, 10:01 PM
  #27  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,914
Received 1,983 Likes on 1,607 Posts
Originally Posted by sleeperstang
Ya I was thinking about lowering my car but I'm kinda glad I haven't yet.
If your definitely planning on upgrading to LT headers ? Then I highly recommend against lowering your car !
Old 3/31/15, 11:00 AM
  #28  
Post *****
 
2k7gtcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,753
Received 159 Likes on 133 Posts
I'm at a 1.5"-2" drop on k springs The kooks headers are no lower than the stock over axle pipes. In fact the lowest point in my car is the stock k member. Just put a bridge jack on my 4 post lift and the closest thing to clearing was the k member. And the rear lca relo brackets.

Last edited by 2k7gtcs; 3/31/15 at 11:04 AM.
Old 3/31/15, 06:45 PM
  #29  
THE RED FLASH ------Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 9,914
Received 1,983 Likes on 1,607 Posts
In that case ! I now know what one of my next mods are going to be

Last edited by m05fastbackGT; 3/31/15 at 06:47 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cameron2581
'10-14 Interior and Audio
5
11/26/15 01:26 PM
Antigini-GT/CS
2005-2009 Mustang
5
10/5/15 09:43 AM
GeoWett
GT
3
9/30/15 06:40 AM
M3hunter
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
5
9/10/15 09:26 AM



Quick Reply: Which upgrade next?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 AM.