4.6L DOHC Engine rumors
Just read on this site http://www.stangsunleashed.com/forums/inde...p?showtopic=187 about more rumors on a upcoming 4.6L DOHC engine.
Quote from towards the bottom of this thread:
Seems to go with threads on here concerning this same subject
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?sh...ndpost&p=550694
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?sh...ndpost&p=568534
A lot of recent discussions/rumors about an upcoming engine in between the GT500's and the current Mustang GT.
Quote from towards the bottom of this thread:
Here's the particulars: 4.6L cast iron block, 32 valve heads, new style supercharger, 2003/2004 Cobra internals, 450 dyno-horsepower.
No doubt that more Mustang variants are coming, so it may go in one of those. Of which, though, I do not know. These might even be test engines for some other purpose.
No doubt that more Mustang variants are coming, so it may go in one of those. Of which, though, I do not know. These might even be test engines for some other purpose.
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?sh...ndpost&p=550694
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?sh...ndpost&p=568534
A lot of recent discussions/rumors about an upcoming engine in between the GT500's and the current Mustang GT.
Originally posted by AFBLUE@November 24, 2005, 9:47 PM
Just read on this site http://www.stangsunleashed.com/forums/inde...p?showtopic=187 about more rumors on a upcoming 4.6L DOHC engine.
Quote from towards the bottom of this thread:
Seems to go with threads on here concerning this same subject
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?sh...ndpost&p=550694
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?sh...ndpost&p=568534
A lot of recent discussions/rumors about an upcoming engine in between the GT500's and the current Mustang GT.
Just read on this site http://www.stangsunleashed.com/forums/inde...p?showtopic=187 about more rumors on a upcoming 4.6L DOHC engine.
Quote from towards the bottom of this thread:
Seems to go with threads on here concerning this same subject
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?sh...ndpost&p=550694
http://forums.bradbarnett.net/index.php?sh...ndpost&p=568534
A lot of recent discussions/rumors about an upcoming engine in between the GT500's and the current Mustang GT.
hmm..
so there is the 300HP GT, a 450HP s/e and a 475HP shelby
Unless they are dropping the shelby, that combination doesn't make sense.
I would guess that the DOHC motor is n/a with 350HP, then again, maybe a small s/c to get it up to 400HP
its all just speculation as it is.
so there is the 300HP GT, a 450HP s/e and a 475HP shelby
Unless they are dropping the shelby, that combination doesn't make sense.
I would guess that the DOHC motor is n/a with 350HP, then again, maybe a small s/c to get it up to 400HP
its all just speculation as it is.
Originally posted by MSP@November 25, 2005, 7:19 PM
So basically what your saying is, a GT500 may not be the absolute answer for everyone?
So basically what your saying is, a GT500 may not be the absolute answer for everyone?
Not sure how you have me saying that. Just posting info from other threads on a new more powerful 4.6L engine.
Originally posted by Boomer@November 25, 2005, 8:02 PM
Something between the GT/GT500 with 390-425hp supercharged 4.6 would be great.
Something between the GT/GT500 with 390-425hp supercharged 4.6 would be great.
That would strike me as a slightly odd motor for a mid-range SE -- heavy iron block, expensive and complex SC.
I could see a hi-po AL block DOHC 4.6 with upwards of 350hp backed by a 6spd MTX as a neo Boss. The last thing a more balanced Boss type performance car would need is all that dead weight upfront in the nose from a pig iron block and SC system to give it mulish handling.
Or an AL block, 3V or 4V 5.4, again with upwards of 350+ hp but more torque, as a Mach I motor. An FE block here might be more plausible as Mach Is are pretty much one-trick ponies -- quarter horses basically -- for which Nth degree handling is a rather distant concern. They are also more likely to be hot rodded to such a degree as to actually necessitate the strength of an FE block. In addition, I think the complexity and cost of an SC system might be a disincentive for the legion of backyard hot rodders for whom the Mach I might most appeal.
However, those are just my seat of the pants musings...
I could see a hi-po AL block DOHC 4.6 with upwards of 350hp backed by a 6spd MTX as a neo Boss. The last thing a more balanced Boss type performance car would need is all that dead weight upfront in the nose from a pig iron block and SC system to give it mulish handling.
Or an AL block, 3V or 4V 5.4, again with upwards of 350+ hp but more torque, as a Mach I motor. An FE block here might be more plausible as Mach Is are pretty much one-trick ponies -- quarter horses basically -- for which Nth degree handling is a rather distant concern. They are also more likely to be hot rodded to such a degree as to actually necessitate the strength of an FE block. In addition, I think the complexity and cost of an SC system might be a disincentive for the legion of backyard hot rodders for whom the Mach I might most appeal.
However, those are just my seat of the pants musings...
Well shoot - why don't they stroke the motor enough to get one more cubic inch per cylinder. Then they could call it the "High Performance" 289. They could make the engine code "K" for Mustang. That would be a GREAT idea! But, I think I have heard of that some place before.
Originally posted by CrossBoss@November 28, 2005, 3:39 PM
Well shoot - why don't they stroke the motor enough to get one more cubic inch per cylinder. Then they could call it the "High Performance" 289. They could make the engine code "K" for Mustang. That would be a GREAT idea! But, I think I have heard of that some place before.
Well shoot - why don't they stroke the motor enough to get one more cubic inch per cylinder. Then they could call it the "High Performance" 289. They could make the engine code "K" for Mustang. That would be a GREAT idea! But, I think I have heard of that some place before.
Increasing the bore to 91.5mm = 288.9 CID (displacement of the old 289 was actually 288.5 CID).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




