2005-2009 Mustang Information on The S197 {Gen1}

14 MPG

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10/21/04, 02:37 PM
  #21  
GT Member
 
ustabawannab's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 14, 2004
Location: Greenfield, WI
Posts: 157
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
300 Hp and yer worried about MPG!!!!

Old 10/21/04, 02:39 PM
  #22  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Falchion's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Yeah man, I want my cake and I want to eat it too!
Old 10/21/04, 02:51 PM
  #23  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,973
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally posted by Indystang@October 21, 2004, 12:33 PM
Use good gas, Not the independant stuff, that will help you too. Remember he's in Colorado too. Thin air might not help either and those Mountains too. Have a great time driving you lucky guy :drive:
Except for brand additives, there's no difference between independent gas and name brand gas. Base gasoline is blended to a specification. Each refiner blends to that spec and sends it to the distributor where it all goes in the storage tanks with gas of the same spec. In some cases, gas from different refiners actually gets mixed together in the pipeline. Brand specific additives (i.e. Chevron Techron) are added before it's shipped to the gas stations. The one exception to this is the higher octane premium that some brands sell (I believe Sunoco is one).
Old 10/21/04, 02:55 PM
  #24  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsheehan's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 2, 2004
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by 97svtgoin05gt@October 21, 2004, 2:35 PM
I'm of course still on the first tank, but I can tell she's thirsty. Tool me 1/4 tank just to get her home. That's about 112 miles.

I'm sure breakin will help us, but not by 2x that's for sure. Realistically, this thing will probably only deliver 15-17 around town.


So you say you got 112 miles for 1/4 of a tank? That would be about 448 miles for the whole tank, and these cars have 16 gallon tanks, correct? That's 28 mpg right there.
Old 10/21/04, 03:01 PM
  #25  
Mach 1 Member
 
upstate's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 25, 2004
Posts: 866
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
JSHeehan I like your math. If you are right it's a beautiful thing.
Old 10/21/04, 03:03 PM
  #26  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Falchion's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I hope the Mustang doesn't turn out to be like the RX8 when it first came out. Mazda said it got about five miles per gallon more then that car actually got. Had to make a settlement with the owners......
Old 10/21/04, 03:05 PM
  #27  
dke
Bullitt Member
 
dke's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2004
Posts: 431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got about 250hp (and the newer M3's have about 333), and they get over 20 mpg+ around town. (I can get 30 on the highway). I realize that's a 6 versus an 8. But there are other 8's that shutdown cylinders on the highway and get nearly the same. So I'd think Ford could do about same.
Old 10/21/04, 03:05 PM
  #28  
Member
 
USMA82's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 16, 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey, I hear you about the poor MPG. It may be that you got a lemon.

I had a 1996, 1998 and 2000 Merc Villager. All three were rated at 17/23 MPG. The 1996 and 1998 had exactly the same drive train. The 2000 was similar but had the 3.3 ltr engine vs. the 3.0. Anyway, the 1996 averaged 20MPG (combined city/hwy) and so did the 2000 Villager. The 1998 model only averaged 12-13 MPG! :bang: The best mileage I ever got was during a trip to Florida (19 MPG).

I had the car checked by several Dealerships and no one could figure out why the mileage was so poor. Ford finally gave me $2000 to cover the added fuel cost till my lease was up!

During one of my many phone conversations with the factory rep I learned that the mileage posted on the sticker is an average figure. If you look at the fine print below the mileage numbers on the sticker you will see a much wider MPG range. In my case the city mileage was as low as 12 MPG and as high as 19. The rep also told me that about one in 50 vans coming off the line were getting mileage towards the lower end of the scale. Go figure!
Old 10/21/04, 03:14 PM
  #29  
Bullitt Member
 
HairyCanary's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by ustabawannab@October 21, 2004, 12:40 PM
300 Hp and yer worried about MPG!!!!

With 14 MPG, I would be too . I've got 500 horsepower, and I get 18-20 mpg.
Old 10/21/04, 03:38 PM
  #30  
Cobra Member
 
eric n's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 27, 2004
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I get around 10 with my fastback. Might have to get one of these as an economy car. Almost like a prius.
Old 10/21/04, 04:07 PM
  #31  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsheehan's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 2, 2004
Posts: 347
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
One thing about the mpg is that it is rated according to EPA standards, which don't really reflect people's driving habits now. They assume such things as that people warm their cars up before they drive them, and that people don't make 5 minute drives down to the corner store to pick up a loaf of bread. Most cars actually get a few mpg lower than what is on the sticker under normal driving, even less if you drive like I do.
Old 10/21/04, 05:15 PM
  #32  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Falchion's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Hmmm, I was hoping the GT would get better mileage then 14 though. I was hopeing that combined would be 20 at least. If gas keeps going the way it is, then that could hurt the resell value later on in a couple of years.........
Old 10/21/04, 05:33 PM
  #33  
FR500 Member
 
SixtySix's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 23, 2004
Posts: 3,153
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
As long as your not "gettin on it" all the time, you "should" be around 20mpg combined driving. Heck my 66' 289 made 360 horses and got 20 mpg!

(It was balanced and blueprinted, headers, edelbrock intake, and a 450 cfm Holley carb)
Old 10/21/04, 05:34 PM
  #34  
Bullitt Member
 
ZRX4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 19, 2004
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got 21mpg coming back from Daytona today.I was doing 80 and 85mph.I love that info display.
Old 10/21/04, 06:18 PM
  #35  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Falchion's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Was that in a 05 GT ZRX4ME?
Old 10/21/04, 06:23 PM
  #36  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by jsheehan+October 21, 2004, 2:58 PM--></div><table border='0' align='center' width='95%' cellpadding='3' cellspacing='1'><tr><td>QUOTE (jsheehan @ October 21, 2004, 2:58 PM)</td></tr><tr><td id='QUOTE'> <!--QuoteBegin-97svtgoin05gt@October 21, 2004, 2:35 PM
I'm of course still on the first tank, but I can tell she's thirsty. Tool me 1/4 tank just to get her home. That's about 112 miles.

I'm sure breakin will help us, but not by 2x that's for sure. Realistically, this thing will probably only deliver 15-17 around town.


So you say you got 112 miles for 1/4 of a tank? That would be about 448 miles for the whole tank, and these cars have 16 gallon tanks, correct? That's 28 mpg right there. [/b][/quote]
I would tend to agree with one exception. Anyone who's owned these cars in the past know that once that needle starts to move...it REALLY MOVES. My drive was all highway back here. Time will tell.
Old 10/21/04, 06:29 PM
  #37  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally posted by SixtySix@October 21, 2004, 5:36 PM
As long as your not "gettin on it" all the time, you "should" be around 20mpg combined driving. Heck my 66' 289 made 360 horses and got 20 mpg!

(It was balanced and blueprinted, headers, edelbrock intake, and a 450 cfm Holley carb)
That's a tiny pisser of a carb. A big reason for the mileage.
Old 10/21/04, 06:37 PM
  #38  
Cobra Member
 
lodom's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2004
Posts: 1,110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've owned a lot of new cars and in the past 15 years have never gotten less than the city EPA average. 14 MPG seems pretty low. Hopefully it will improve. I usually ageraged 18-20 out of my 99 auto GT. If I drove it hard, I obviously got less.
Old 10/21/04, 06:53 PM
  #39  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Falchion's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 12, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Good, I hope so. I feel a little better now, thanks........
Old 10/21/04, 07:00 PM
  #40  
Retired Tms Staff
 
adrenalin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 26, 2004
Posts: 10,606
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Okay, I know this sounds bad but when I complained about the fuel mileage I was getting in my Jeep this is what the dealer told me " Get on the highway and go 100km /hr (remember I am in Canada). Drive 5 km at that speed with cruise control on. Reset your computer and you will see for the first minute it shows exactly what it says on paper you will get for gas mileage." Wouldn't you know it, the bugger was right. I tested that in my 2000 Grand Prix GTP and it was accurate as well.


Quick Reply: 14 MPG



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 PM.