1994-2004 V-6 3.8 and 3.9L V6 Mustangs

What Did I Loose?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 7/19/04, 02:33 AM
  #1  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
s7v7n's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone here know what kind of HP and TQ I lost going from my old 95 T-Bird (V8) to the 2004 V6? It doesn't seem as peppy, but I bet it does, I am just not driving it like I used to drive the T-Bird (hahah, I care about my new one).
Old 7/19/04, 03:21 AM
  #2  
GTR Member
 
jgsmuzzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 27, 2004
Location: Manchester, England
Posts: 4,748
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I wouldn't think the power loss is that great, the 1995 engines were not powerful, the V6 only put out 130bhp then compared to 193 now. I think the V8's were about 200 hp back then.

JAmes
Old 7/19/04, 07:01 AM
  #3  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,737
Received 343 Likes on 216 Posts
With the wear and tear, most likely you gained some.
Old 7/19/04, 11:35 AM
  #4  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
s7v7n's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So you are saying that my 04 V6 could prolly take my old 95 (V8) T-Bird?
Old 7/19/04, 12:11 PM
  #5  
Bullitt Member
 
Scootr's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 4, 2004
Location: Tallmadge OH
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From what I've seen it looks like your T-Bird had about 205-215 HP...unless it was a supercoupe which was 230HP. Either way you gave up very little and got a sweet ride in return! As mentioned though,with wear and tear you're probably doing a little better than the T-Bird in the HP department right now
Old 7/19/04, 12:55 PM
  #6  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
JeffreyDJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 2, 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 3,621
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
The ol' T-Bird also weighed a bit more as well. Give the new car time to break in.
Old 7/19/04, 03:44 PM
  #7  
AKA 1 BULLITT------------ Legacy TMS Member
 
1 COBRA's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Location: U S A
Posts: 7,737
Received 343 Likes on 216 Posts
Originally posted by s7v7n@July 19, 2004, 12:38 PM
So you are saying...
That's a Roger. You did good Abe.
Old 7/19/04, 09:03 PM
  #8  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
conv_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i think the V8 tbirds were only rated at 215. in 95 they had the 4.6 right??? if not i think the 5.0 was only rated at like 190. b/c it was not the HO version like the stang. the stang might not have as much down low b/c of torque loss. but in the 1/4 the stang would win
Old 7/20/04, 03:25 PM
  #9  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
s7v7n's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well I am happy now to know this...look! a banana
Old 7/20/04, 04:36 PM
  #10  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
1995 Ford Thunderbird

Available Engines:
140-hp, 3.8-liter V-6
205-hp, 4.6-liter V-8
230-hp, 3.8-liter V-6
Old 7/21/04, 12:10 AM
  #11  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
s7v7n's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think the 230HP was a V8 as well? I didn't have the super coupe...so, I was @ 205...cool, so once the breakend comes into effect, I should have that T-Bird then! WOOHOO!
Old 7/21/04, 04:45 PM
  #12  
Mach 1 Member
 
DanS.02GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 230 hp version was the Super Coupe. It had a supercharged 3.8 V-6, and was the only one available with a stick.
Old 7/22/04, 08:30 PM
  #13  
Mach 1 Member
 
Mestizo's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 23, 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by 1 BULLITT@July 19, 2004, 7:04 AM
With the wear and tear, most likely you gained some.
Ironically, Motor Trend they tested the Mazda 6, it lost some time and increased braking distance.

So that car lost speed when it got older.
Old 7/26/04, 11:28 AM
  #14  
Bullitt Member
 
kevinspann's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 23, 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
would the supercharger from the supercoupe fit easily on a 90- 93 mustang w/ the 3.8
Old 7/27/04, 07:57 PM
  #15  
Mach 1 Member
 
DanS.02GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 12, 2004
Posts: 534
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there was no 3.8 Mustang from 87-93.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ricky1728
SN95 Mustang
1
2/11/16 07:25 PM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
10/2/15 01:00 PM
jim010
2010-2014 Mustang
1
9/14/15 10:15 PM
00StangVert
1994-2004 V-6
3
9/11/15 12:08 PM
tukatz
General Mustang Chat
8
8/26/15 02:06 PM



Quick Reply: What Did I Loose?



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:53 AM.