RWHP prediction for the fun of it
#61
Shelby GT500 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
knock knock, wheres the update?????
good luck let us know how things go. hey, if you get bored with that motor. you can putit in my car for me. and get you a bigger one!
![Biggrinjester](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/biggrinjester.gif)
#64
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well here is the update.
The engine still seems to be tight and we don't have everything worked out.
A very heat soaked, and still a little rich engine only put down 370 RWHP, I hope there are more ponies to be had.
At the track, you could tell I have not run one since 1978. My reaction time was all over the place .250 to .500. On street tires and a 200 lb passenger, I ran 12.6 at 110 mph with tons of spinning. I think we should be able to get in the 11s.
I will post another update in about 2 or 3 weeks when hopefully we will have some more of the bugs worked out.
Also, for the fun of I ran my 03 Cobra Vert, with the stock F1 tires and a passenger, I ran 12.7 at 112 mph. I guess that wasn't too bad considering my 60' was 2.4 and I had to get out of it to stop spinning.
The engine still seems to be tight and we don't have everything worked out.
A very heat soaked, and still a little rich engine only put down 370 RWHP, I hope there are more ponies to be had.
At the track, you could tell I have not run one since 1978. My reaction time was all over the place .250 to .500. On street tires and a 200 lb passenger, I ran 12.6 at 110 mph with tons of spinning. I think we should be able to get in the 11s.
I will post another update in about 2 or 3 weeks when hopefully we will have some more of the bugs worked out.
Also, for the fun of I ran my 03 Cobra Vert, with the stock F1 tires and a passenger, I ran 12.7 at 112 mph. I guess that wasn't too bad considering my 60' was 2.4 and I had to get out of it to stop spinning.
#69
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got some to use. I got to get a line lock on there so I can get them hot.
I also hope to make the 401 - 450 votes be right.
I also hope to make the 401 - 450 votes be right.
Originally posted by Scothew@March 26, 2005, 12:48 PM
Glenn, your fox a 5-lug?? I have some 26/8.5/15 e/t drags we need to put on it![Wink](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Glenn, your fox a 5-lug?? I have some 26/8.5/15 e/t drags we need to put on it
![Wink](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
#70
Shelby GT500 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice, not bad for a motor w/ no miles. should probably go with paul and pick you up a different intake. man, with some miles, a good tune and some traction you should be good to go.
#71
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am very disappointed at this time. I feel it should be more like 450 RWHP. I think it must be one of 3 things, 1) not enough air, intake or small SC, 2) SC robbing too much power, it seems very hard to turn, 3) exhaust restrictive.
I am open to suggestions.
Air to Fuel Ratio was good on dyno, I had plenty of fuel with the 42#ers. The boost was reading 7# on the climb. The high boost could be a sign of restriction in the intake or exhaust. The belt squeals on the SC on almost every startup, the belt stretches and needs more adjustment after just a few minutes, this could be a sign of high friction in the SC.
I am open to suggestions.
Air to Fuel Ratio was good on dyno, I had plenty of fuel with the 42#ers. The boost was reading 7# on the climb. The high boost could be a sign of restriction in the intake or exhaust. The belt squeals on the SC on almost every startup, the belt stretches and needs more adjustment after just a few minutes, this could be a sign of high friction in the SC.
#73
Stubborn Bear
TMS Staff
TMS Staff
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
What throttle body are you running and MAF? I really think Pauls suggestion on the intake is a valid one.
Also I know you are only pushing 6lbs of boost, that motor could take ALOT more. I'd say 10psi would be alot more noticeable, but would be closer to teh limits of the novi1k.
How much timing are you adding? at the dist or through spark advance in the ECU?
I saw you are running BBK shorties, I think a 347 is really going to open up with some LT's as well as 3" midpipe running down into the 2.5" catback.
Also I know you are only pushing 6lbs of boost, that motor could take ALOT more. I'd say 10psi would be alot more noticeable, but would be closer to teh limits of the novi1k.
How much timing are you adding? at the dist or through spark advance in the ECU?
I saw you are running BBK shorties, I think a 347 is really going to open up with some LT's as well as 3" midpipe running down into the 2.5" catback.
#74
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Scothew@March 28, 2005, 6:16 PM
What throttle body are you running and MAF? I really think Pauls suggestion on the intake is a valid one.
Also I know you are only pushing 6lbs of boost, that motor could take ALOT more. I'd say 10psi would be alot more noticeable, but would be closer to the limits of the novi1k.
How much timing are you adding? at the dist or through spark advance in the ECU?
I saw you are running BBK shorties, I think a 347 is really going to open up with some LT's as well as 3" midpipe running down into the 2.5" catback.
What throttle body are you running and MAF? I really think Pauls suggestion on the intake is a valid one.
Also I know you are only pushing 6lbs of boost, that motor could take ALOT more. I'd say 10psi would be alot more noticeable, but would be closer to the limits of the novi1k.
How much timing are you adding? at the dist or through spark advance in the ECU?
I saw you are running BBK shorties, I think a 347 is really going to open up with some LT's as well as 3" midpipe running down into the 2.5" catback.
I have 12 degrees timing at dist and a total of 21.
Exhaust maybe the restriction but I have seen these shorties and 2 1/2" exhaust make more than 500 RWHP.
Once I get things where I think they should be, I will look at increasing boost. The NOVI 1000 should be good to at least 500 HP.
#75
Bullitt Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Thread Starter
Join Date: November 4, 2004
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well it was not the intake. I changed to a Edelbrock Victor 5.0 and only gained 6 RWHP. I have come to the conclusion that the NOVI 1000 is just not enough for this engine. I kept the compression low, 9.1/1, for boost, so I have got to go get some boost.
#77
Originally posted by angcobra+March 26, 2005, 3:32 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(angcobra @ March 26, 2005, 3:32 PM)</div><div class='quotemain'>I got some to use. I got to get a line lock on there so I can get them hot.
I also hope to make the 401 - 450 votes be right.
[/b]
I also hope to make the 401 - 450 votes be right.
Originally posted by Scothew@March 26, 2005, 12:48 PM
Glenn, your fox a 5-lug?? I have some 26/8.5/15 e/t drags we need to put on it![Wink](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
Glenn, your fox a 5-lug?? I have some 26/8.5/15 e/t drags we need to put on it
![Wink](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/smilies/wink.gif)
why not just powerbrake it?
<!--QuoteBegin-angcobra@March 27, 2005, 4:54 PM
I am very disappointed at this time. I feel it should be more like 450 RWHP. I think it must be one of 3 things, 1) not enough air, intake or small SC, 2) SC robbing too much power, it seems very hard to turn, 3) exhaust restrictive.
I am open to suggestions.
Air to Fuel Ratio was good on dyno, I had plenty of fuel with the 42#ers. The boost was reading 7# on the climb. The high boost could be a sign of restriction in the intake or exhaust. The belt squeals on the SC on almost every startup, the belt stretches and needs more adjustment after just a few minutes, this could be a sign of high friction in the SC.
[/quote]
it is loud at idle until broke in usually (centrifugal)
Keep the blower, just have it tuned, talk to crash -
http://www.got-pressure.com/yabbse/index.php?board=4
#79
Shelby GT500 Member
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice! hey, ill borrow your novi. my 92 needs more power. looking at a hellion turbo kit. comes with everything but a computer chip! let us know when its here!
#80
Service Manager
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
![](https://themustangsource.com/forums/images/rank.gif)
Originally posted by Fordracing200@April 12, 2005, 6:54 PM
why not just powerbrake it?
why not just powerbrake it?