Fox Mustangs 1979-1993 Mustangs Member Tech & Restoration Discussion

2 spark plugs per cylinder?

Old Dec 18, 2005 | 12:28 PM
  #1  
Valentino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2004
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
I was surfing around at Consumer Guide auto section website and I read this:

1991 Ford Mustang: Four-cylinder engines gained two spark plugs per cylinder and 15 horsepower, now rated at 105. Convertible tops now folded closer to the body. Automatic transmissions added a brake/shift interlock.
Is it true that '91 (and I'm assuming '92-93's) 4 cylinders had two spark plugs PER cylinder? Whether its true or not I never heard that before.

*edit* sorry, It's consumer guide, not consumer report
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 02:02 PM
  #2  
HastaLaVista's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: December 18, 2004
Posts: 1,185
Likes: 0
Yeah, that's true. Think the new HEMI has that as well. It's been done on different engines since forever. More power & fewer emissions is the desired goal, with the latter being more important in recent years.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 02:55 PM
  #3  
Autotooner's Avatar
My C/T is cooler than Arin is.
 
Joined: August 6, 2004
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 4
From: Parkersburg, WV
I've also seen Rangers with that engine.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 03:15 PM
  #4  
ScottyBoy302's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: August 20, 2005
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
From: BC
true true, weve got one of each.
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2005 | 06:26 PM
  #5  
Valentino's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2004
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
I knew other engines had 2/cyl but didn't know the Ford 2.3 had it. I guess you learn something new every couple of months.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 05:23 AM
  #6  
glowstang93's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: November 7, 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Question

Originally posted by Valentino@December 18, 2005, 8:29 PM
I knew other engines had 2/cyl but didn't know the Ford 2.3 had it. I guess you learn something new every couple of months.



Here is some pics of my 93 2.3 dual plug. All stock except for the alternator upgrade, removed air silencer, and drop-in K&N air filter.

I believe the motor was used in Rangers first then in 91-93 mustangs. This motor jumped hp from 88 to 105. I enjoy mine, not a 5.0, but plenty fast enough.
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 08:44 AM
  #7  
Big D's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2005
Posts: 3,371
Likes: 2
From: Ontario Canada
how does it sound? i mean does it still sound like a mustang or like one of those imports?
Reply
Old Dec 27, 2005 | 09:59 AM
  #8  
glowstang93's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: November 7, 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Big D@December 27, 2005, 10:47 AM
how does it sound? i mean does it still sound like a mustang or like one of those imports?
No ricer sound here. It sounds like a 4 cylinder, i have a turbo muffler on it, so i get a little rumble there, but nothing real real noticable.
Reply
Old Dec 31, 2005 | 11:26 AM
  #9  
kevinspann's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 23, 2004
Posts: 321
Likes: 0
mine sounds like a turd because of the cheapo muffler that was used when it was replaced, with the crusty old tailpipe reattached to it...I gotta do someting about that. It definately sounds like a 4cyl at 3-4000 rpm


Glowstang93...i wish i had your car...
Reply
Old Jan 2, 2006 | 04:11 AM
  #10  
glowstang93's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: November 7, 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Thanks, but I'm sure your pony is nice too. Got any pics?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gill5oh
2010-2014 Mustang
15
Oct 6, 2017 10:50 PM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
tj@steeda
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1
Sep 23, 2015 03:21 PM
devildog1679
'10-14 Interior and Audio
3
Sep 14, 2015 02:17 PM
bconboy
2005-2009 Mustang
6
Sep 10, 2015 02:31 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:55 PM.