1964-1970 Mustang Member Tech & Restoration Discussion

Livewire

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 3/2/05, 06:27 PM
  #1  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
jc69Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 22, 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

LiveWire,

OK, here are all of my specs that I think you need to do this.

426W
Bore= 4.032
Stroke= 4.190
CR = 10.55:1 could be a little higher with the 58cc heads, but thats ok.
AFR 205cc heads

Cam Small base circle Crane hydraulic roller. Part # 44hr00027
Grind # HR-230-359-2s-12-rf
Lift is 574 intake, 595 exhaust.
rocker arm 1.60
advertised duration is 294 / 302
duration @ 050 is 230 /238

I run a single plane Super Victor Jr manifold,
750cfm holley mechanical secondaries.
MSD distributer
Jacobs pro street ignition.
1 3/4" headers.

If I left anything out, let me know, I have my cam sheet with me today.
And thanks for the info!
That should do it!

Thanks again
Old 3/2/05, 08:22 PM
  #2  
GT Member
 
Livewire's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 20, 2004
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Thats not an exact match to your cam because I couldnt find the right numbers for it online. Can you check the part number or try and find a link on Jegs or Summit or Crane?
Old 3/2/05, 09:00 PM
  #3  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
jc69Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 22, 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
LiveWire,

thanks for your efforts. It doens't appear that my cam is made anymore, maybe it is a special order one?

Here are my other specs on the cam sheet.

cam timing @050
Intake Opens 8 btdc closes 42abdc
Exhaust Opens 56 bbdc closes 2 atdc
Max lift is 107/117

Timing @ tappet
Lift .004
intake opens 36 btdc closes 78 abdc 294 duration
exhaust opens 84 bbdc closes 38 atdc 302 duration

All based on zero lash as well.
I hope that helps or check the Cam below.



This Trick Flow cam has the exact same lift just a little more duration than mine.

TFS-51402002 in summitt. that one would be better I think.
Old 3/3/05, 12:25 AM
  #4  
GT Member
 
Livewire's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 20, 2004
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Those are the numbers I needed thanks
Old 3/3/05, 12:36 AM
  #5  
GT Member
 
Livewire's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 20, 2004
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


Nice numbers
Old 3/3/05, 08:55 AM
  #6  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
jc69Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 22, 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Holy Crap! I hope those are close to reality once this thing is back together!

There are a few chevy loving freaks that need to go down around here....

I will take it to the chasis dyno and we can compare numbers again after that.

Thanks again,

Joe
Old 3/3/05, 01:52 PM
  #7  
GT Member
 
Livewire's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 20, 2004
Posts: 104
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
those are flywheel numbers so you should assume about 20% drivetrain loss but still very nice numbers
Old 3/3/05, 03:06 PM
  #8  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
jc69Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 22, 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Livewire@March 3, 2005, 2:55 PM
those are flywheel numbers so you should assume about 20% drivetrain loss but still very nice numbers
Yeah, but we should be able to see how close the program is. I have considered taking the motor to a engine dyno first, then I would know it is setup right. But I am not sure if I have enough $$$ to get that done.

Thanks again!
Old 3/4/05, 08:41 AM
  #9  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
jc69Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 22, 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Also I guess swapping out the cam is no longer in question...Those numbers look great.
Old 3/4/05, 11:09 AM
  #10  
Member
 
Edbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 1, 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
In my opinion Desktop Dyno is a little optimistic, at least thats what I found with my (much milder) build. This is a 357W (bored only), with 9.5:1, perf-rpm heads and intake, holley 750, 1-5/8 long tubes, 224/236 .506/.506 110O hyrdraulic.




Drivetrain parasitic loss can vary greatly, if you have a standard, and with such high output you could well see less than 20% loss. I am expecting 20+% on mine, the 9-inch rear and the AOD are gonna stink some ooomph for sure.
Old 3/5/05, 10:40 AM
  #11  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
jc69Stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 22, 2004
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sure those numbers are if all things are just right and perfect. I was hoping for around 550hp so I still think I will be in the ballpark.
It's just nice to see that grapgh...
Old 3/5/05, 03:03 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Edbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 1, 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by jc69Stang@March 5, 2005, 12:43 PM
It's just nice to see that grapgh...
Couldn't agree more! I was expecting about 420fwhp from mine, not the 445 DTD showed.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
07alloygt
GT Performance Mods
7
4/20/08 02:19 PM
metroplex
2005-2009 Mustang
4
1/19/08 05:39 PM
VegasGold
GT Performance Mods
9
3/4/07 03:38 AM
Doug@C&L
GT Performance Mods
25
2/17/07 02:23 PM



Quick Reply: Livewire



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:25 AM.