Met the master on the Sabbath yesterday
I was just gonna say... it's not like the interior on our cars is that much better 
6/4/14, 07:28 PM
#23
Bullitt Member
I just finished up washing my car and my sisters car. Her interior feels like its made of higher quality materials and a tad finer attention to detail. Her's is a 2011 Kia Optima, and mine is a 2011 Mustang GT/CS.
Honestly, Fords interior really isn't that great. it's not on these current S197 mustangs at least. Still better than the current Camaro interior.
6/4/14, 09:52 PM
#24
I Have No Life
6/4/14, 10:25 PM
#25
Bullitt Member
I'm not big on interiors, but I definitely wouldn't want my 100K car to look like the inside of a Tonka toy hahaha
6/4/14, 10:30 PM
#26
Bullitt Member
6/5/14, 05:14 AM
#27
I Have No Life
True... But for me, I *think* ford interiors are far better than GM in terms of looks and quality and feel. And you're right, that's not even saying much. Meaning ford interiors are not even THAT good. But if I'm saying that the ford interiors aren't even that good, what does that tell you about what I think of GM interiors? Lol. They're absolutely horrible.
6/5/14, 09:27 AM
#29
Banned
Join Date: August 2, 2013
Location: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Posts: 3,090
Received 254 Likes
on
230 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromZto5
A crappy and rattly interior is acceptable on a 28k base car. On a 50k vette not acceptable. On a 100k zr1, absolutely unacceptable. That's my point.
I think you both make a good point. I've done a lot of work on Vettes and Camaros (I work in the auto industry). I was never a fan of Camaro interior, but I do like the Vettes. All I really cared about was the cluster and the shifter anyway.
But let's be honest, the best thing about driving these cars (Mustang too) is not the fact the interior is nice or plush, it's the performance, the mechanical feel, the handling and the noises it makes when you press the go pedal.
If I was very concerned about the interior I'd be driving a BMW, a Lexus or a Cadillac. American muscle was never really about plush interior, it was about pure, unadulterated MUSCLE.
Originally Posted by FromZto5
A crappy and rattly interior is acceptable on a 28k base car. On a 50k vette not acceptable. On a 100k zr1, absolutely unacceptable. That's my point.
HTML Code:
But the GT500 interior is not much different compared to the base mustang.... Also >50K car?!?!
But let's be honest, the best thing about driving these cars (Mustang too) is not the fact the interior is nice or plush, it's the performance, the mechanical feel, the handling and the noises it makes when you press the go pedal.
If I was very concerned about the interior I'd be driving a BMW, a Lexus or a Cadillac. American muscle was never really about plush interior, it was about pure, unadulterated MUSCLE.
Last edited by 5.M0NSTER; 6/5/14 at 09:28 AM.
6/5/14, 10:38 AM
#30
I Have No Life
Quote: Originally Posted by FromZto5 A crappy and rattly interior is acceptable on a 28k base car. On a 50k vette not acceptable. On a 100k zr1, absolutely unacceptable. That's my point. But the GT500 interior is not much different compared to the base mustang.... Also >50K car?!?! I think you both make a good point. I've done a lot of work on Vettes and Camaros (I work in the auto industry). I was never a fan of Camaro interior, but I do like the Vettes. All I really cared about was the cluster and the shifter anyway. But let's be honest, the best thing about driving these cars (Mustang too) is not the fact the interior is nice or plush, it's the performance, the mechanical feel, the handling and the noises it makes when you press the go pedal. If I was very concerned about the interior I'd be driving a BMW, a Lexus or a Cadillac. American muscle was never really about plush interior, it was about pure, unadulterated MUSCLE.
If I was very concerned about the interior I'd be driving a BMW, a Lexus or a Cadillac. American muscle was never really about plush interior, it was about pure, unadulterated MUSCLE. 
6/5/14, 12:03 PM
#31
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
I'm anti Corvette. There I said it.
Probably because the only people I have ever seen driving them are mid life crisis, white-haired old fat men driving down the local University campus strip and revving at the little girls.
Top down at that. Yuck.
Probably because the only people I have ever seen driving them are mid life crisis, white-haired old fat men driving down the local University campus strip and revving at the little girls.
Top down at that. Yuck.
lmao
6/5/14, 03:47 PM
#35
Shelby GT350 Member
Join Date: February 26, 2012
Location: Down south in Dixie
Posts: 2,204
Received 390 Likes
on
287 Posts
I'd take exception to that statement if it wasn't so dayum true. It seems that GM takes a good idea, then stops short on execution in many aspects of the Corvette. But, I've owned Corvettes for 30 years, and it's like a genetic defect now.
6/5/14, 03:54 PM
#36
I Have No Life
Ewwwwwww... Did you just open the CHRYSLER can of worms now??? Lol. Please don't get me started on them lol.
I had a 93 mint rx7. She was sexy red. She was my first sports toy car. Her name was roxy. Ahhhh memories.
I had a 93 mint rx7. She was sexy red. She was my first sports toy car. Her name was roxy. Ahhhh memories.
6/5/14, 04:21 PM
#37
Shelby GT500 Member
Join Date: January 9, 2012
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
6/5/14, 04:26 PM
#38
I Have No Life
What's the emblem on the side? Can't be a zo6 since those are coupes only right?
6/5/14, 04:34 PM
#39
Mach 1 Member
I'll take the looks of a classic 60's Vette over the new designs any day... Not that I could afford either. I don't care if the new Vettes are faster. The old ones are much cooler.
6/5/14, 04:51 PM
#40
Legacy TMS Member
only Chevy I'd ever own. And only if someone gave me one because I'd never spend my own money on a GM product. Ever.