2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Met the master on the Sabbath yesterday

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 4, 2014 | 05:49 PM
  #21  
Black Fire's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 9, 2011
Posts: 261
Likes: 6
From: Michigan
I see ZR1's almost every weekend on Woodward here in the summer.
Watched a stock ZR1 put down at the wheels what a ZO6 makes at the crank.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2014 | 07:06 PM
  #22  
5.M0NSTER's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: August 2, 2013
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 254
From: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Originally Posted by 2012GT
I love my $28,900 supercar that also rattles, semi crappy interior & goes 12.10 @ 116 back to back to back. I'm sure we have something interchangeable with a festiva , focus or something of the sort as well.
I was just gonna say... it's not like the interior on our cars is that much better
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2014 | 07:28 PM
  #23  
KushBandit's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 21, 2014
Posts: 426
Likes: 4
From: IE, SoCal
Originally Posted by 5.M0NSTER
I was just gonna say... it's not like the interior on our cars is that much better
Seriously! Haha.

I just finished up washing my car and my sisters car. Her interior feels like its made of higher quality materials and a tad finer attention to detail. Her's is a 2011 Kia Optima, and mine is a 2011 Mustang GT/CS.

Honestly, Fords interior really isn't that great. it's not on these current S197 mustangs at least. Still better than the current Camaro interior.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2014 | 09:52 PM
  #24  
FromZto5's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Likes: 172
Originally Posted by 5.M0NSTER
I was just gonna say... it's not like the interior on our cars is that much better
A crappy and rattly interior is acceptable on a 28k base car. On a 50k vette not acceptable. On a 100k zr1, absolutely unacceptable. That's my point.
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2014 | 10:25 PM
  #25  
KushBandit's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 21, 2014
Posts: 426
Likes: 4
From: IE, SoCal
Originally Posted by FromZto5

A crappy and rattly interior is acceptable on a 28k base car. On a 50k vette not acceptable. On a 100k zr1, absolutely unacceptable. That's my point.
You do make a good point. The performance upgrades don't justify the price.

I'm not big on interiors, but I definitely wouldn't want my 100K car to look like the inside of a Tonka toy hahaha
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2014 | 10:30 PM
  #26  
Plim's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 7, 2013
Posts: 486
Likes: 10
From: San Jose, CA
Originally Posted by FromZto5
A crappy and rattly interior is acceptable on a 28k base car. On a 50k vette not acceptable. On a 100k zr1, absolutely unacceptable. That's my point.
But the GT500 interior is not much different compared to the base mustang.... Also >50K car?!?!
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 05:14 AM
  #27  
FromZto5's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Likes: 172
Originally Posted by Plim
But the GT500 interior is not much different compared to the base mustang.... Also >50K car?!?!
True... But for me, I *think* ford interiors are far better than GM in terms of looks and quality and feel. And you're right, that's not even saying much. Meaning ford interiors are not even THAT good. But if I'm saying that the ford interiors aren't even that good, what does that tell you about what I think of GM interiors? Lol. They're absolutely horrible.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 08:43 AM
  #28  
devilcaninex's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 24, 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 2
I would trade my mustang for a ZR1 in a minute, rattles and Tonka interior and all.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 09:27 AM
  #29  
5.M0NSTER's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: August 2, 2013
Posts: 3,090
Likes: 254
From: Little north of Stuttgart, Germany
Quote:
Originally Posted by FromZto5
A crappy and rattly interior is acceptable on a 28k base car. On a 50k vette not acceptable. On a 100k zr1, absolutely unacceptable. That's my point.

HTML Code:
But the GT500 interior is not much different compared to the base mustang.... Also >50K car?!?!
I think you both make a good point. I've done a lot of work on Vettes and Camaros (I work in the auto industry). I was never a fan of Camaro interior, but I do like the Vettes. All I really cared about was the cluster and the shifter anyway.

But let's be honest, the best thing about driving these cars (Mustang too) is not the fact the interior is nice or plush, it's the performance, the mechanical feel, the handling and the noises it makes when you press the go pedal.

If I was very concerned about the interior I'd be driving a BMW, a Lexus or a Cadillac. American muscle was never really about plush interior, it was about pure, unadulterated MUSCLE.

Last edited by 5.M0NSTER; Jun 5, 2014 at 09:28 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 10:38 AM
  #30  
FromZto5's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Likes: 172
Originally Posted by devilcaninex
I would trade my mustang for a ZR1 in a minute, rattles and Tonka interior and all.
And then I'd sell it and buy two mustangs…

Originally Posted by 5.M0NSTER
Quote: Originally Posted by FromZto5 A crappy and rattly interior is acceptable on a 28k base car. On a 50k vette not acceptable. On a 100k zr1, absolutely unacceptable. That's my point. But the GT500 interior is not much different compared to the base mustang.... Also >50K car?!?! I think you both make a good point. I've done a lot of work on Vettes and Camaros (I work in the auto industry). I was never a fan of Camaro interior, but I do like the Vettes. All I really cared about was the cluster and the shifter anyway. But let's be honest, the best thing about driving these cars (Mustang too) is not the fact the interior is nice or plush, it's the performance, the mechanical feel, the handling and the noises it makes when you press the go pedal. If I was very concerned about the interior I'd be driving a BMW, a Lexus or a Cadillac. American muscle was never really about plush interior, it was about pure, unadulterated MUSCLE.
Good point… I'm usually too busy listening to the exhaust or trying to fight for traction to worry about the interior.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 12:03 PM
  #31  
Getportfolio's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: July 7, 2012
Posts: 4,421
Likes: 21
From: Indianapolis
I'm anti Corvette. There I said it.

Probably because the only people I have ever seen driving them are mid life crisis, white-haired old fat men driving down the local University campus strip and revving at the little girls.

Top down at that. Yuck.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 12:14 PM
  #32  
devilcaninex's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 24, 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by FromZto5
And then I'd sell it and buy two mustangs…


No, I would sell it and get a 2014 Viper
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 01:31 PM
  #33  
KushBandit's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 21, 2014
Posts: 426
Likes: 4
From: IE, SoCal
Originally Posted by devilcaninex
No, I would sell it and get a 2014 Viper
....but vipers are disgusting lmao
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 03:08 PM
  #34  
devilcaninex's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 24, 2007
Posts: 370
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by KushBandit
....but vipers are disgusting lmao
Ive always wanted one. Love the look of the body. Closest thing to my 95 RX-7. I just need 100k.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 03:47 PM
  #35  
wanted33's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: February 26, 2012
Posts: 2,205
Likes: 392
From: Down south in Dixie
Originally Posted by FromZto5
$100k car with a Chevy cobalt interior. What every man wants...

I'd take exception to that statement if it wasn't so dayum true. It seems that GM takes a good idea, then stops short on execution in many aspects of the Corvette. But, I've owned Corvettes for 30 years, and it's like a genetic defect now.

Name:  Corvette012.jpg
Views: 43
Size:  193.3 KB
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 03:54 PM
  #36  
FromZto5's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Likes: 172
Originally Posted by devilcaninex
No, I would sell it and get a 2014 Viper
Ewwwwwww... Did you just open the CHRYSLER can of worms now??? Lol. Please don't get me started on them lol.

Originally Posted by devilcaninex
Ive always wanted one. Love the look of the body. Closest thing to my 95 RX-7. I just need 100k.
I had a 93 mint rx7. She was sexy red. She was my first sports toy car. Her name was roxy. Ahhhh memories.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 04:21 PM
  #37  
06blackvertstang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2012
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 0
From: Oklahoma
Originally Posted by devilcaninex
I would trade my mustang for a ZR1 in a minute, rattles and Tonka interior and all.
I'm there with you. And the new c7 interior is a whole other level.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 04:26 PM
  #38  
FromZto5's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: September 24, 2011
Posts: 10,141
Likes: 172
Originally Posted by wanted33
I'd take exception to that statement if it wasn't so dayum true. It seems that GM takes a good idea, then stops short on execution in many aspects of the Corvette. But, I've owned Corvettes for 30 years, and it's like a genetic defect now.
What's the emblem on the side? Can't be a zo6 since those are coupes only right?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 04:34 PM
  #39  
Last1's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 25, 2012
Posts: 585
Likes: 1
From: NJ
I'll take the looks of a classic 60's Vette over the new designs any day... Not that I could afford either. I don't care if the new Vettes are faster. The old ones are much cooler.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2014 | 04:51 PM
  #40  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Last1
I'll take the looks of a classic 60's Vette over the new designs any day... Not that I could afford either. I don't care if the new Vettes are faster. The old ones are much cooler.
A '67 Stingray? only Chevy I'd ever own. And only if someone gave me one because I'd never spend my own money on a GM product. Ever.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 PM.