5.0 direct injection
#2
Not necessarily any. Direct injection has been around sine the 1930s but it isn't a power adder. It offers more precision in fuel tuning but requires a host of supporting adaptations to make it work, like a massive mechanical fuel pump, especially in a large displacement V8.
The advantage is that you can inject EXACTLY the right amount of fuel at exactly the right time. right into the chamber. Thus you don't have to mechanically compensate for injector delay, fuel dropout or engine vacuum conditions in your tuning. It makes ridiculously powerful cars easy to drive.
The port injection setup in this car is as close to perfected as you can get with that setup. The injectors are inches from the intake valves, the whole Copperhead fueling setup is fantastically sophisticated, running closed loop all the time, etc. It's about as good as it will get and is relatively cheaply and easily modified for extreme duty should the owner want that.
DI will come for this platform in time; the engine was designed for it but, the plug was pulled as a cost saving measure, since the engine could reach its power, fuel economy and emissions goals with the cheaper PI setup.
The advantage is that you can inject EXACTLY the right amount of fuel at exactly the right time. right into the chamber. Thus you don't have to mechanically compensate for injector delay, fuel dropout or engine vacuum conditions in your tuning. It makes ridiculously powerful cars easy to drive.
The port injection setup in this car is as close to perfected as you can get with that setup. The injectors are inches from the intake valves, the whole Copperhead fueling setup is fantastically sophisticated, running closed loop all the time, etc. It's about as good as it will get and is relatively cheaply and easily modified for extreme duty should the owner want that.
DI will come for this platform in time; the engine was designed for it but, the plug was pulled as a cost saving measure, since the engine could reach its power, fuel economy and emissions goals with the cheaper PI setup.
#4
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As previously said, DI doesn't "make" power. It's advantages lie in precision. With port injection, you'll get a bit of a "pooling" effect of fuel on surfaces outside the combustion chamber (I want to say the engineering calculation for this effect is referred to as Tau, but that might not be right, didn't bother googling before typing ). Eventually that pooling is pulled into the combustion chamber, but it essentially leaves a margin of error, because not all the fuel the injector sprays goes directly in, and when the injector shuts off, there's still fuel to pull in. With direct injection, whatever leaves the injector, is in the combustion chamber, so it's a very exact calculation and you don't have to build in as much margin for error. This lets you tune your fuel and timing tables closer to the limits of knock and hit your fuelling and timing targets very accurately without problems. That's where the extra power and fuel economy comes from. So it essentially becomes a cost-benefit analysis, as DI is much more expensive for both the manufacturer and the end user.
The above is dramatically over simplified but hopefully illustrates the point.
The above is dramatically over simplified but hopefully illustrates the point.
#8
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: March 27, 2014
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 919
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
9/8/15 10:45 AM