What Happens When You Run 87 in the Ecoboost.
That's great news bro. Put a tune on it so you can outrun Ferrari's and be the bestest guy around. lol
We are indeed fortunate to have the knower of all things here.
I have quite an affinity for the 3.7L based on my experience with it in the F-150. It is my choice of engine in a second Mustang. I will not be coerced, cajoled or upsold into an engine that I don't want over an available engine that I know I like.
P.S. Trackey does not add any horsepower to the Boss.
The 3.7L V6 in my junk '13 F-150 is not going away any time soon. I plan on buying out my lease when it's up despite the trucks other glaring flaws. The engine is not one of those flaws. In fact it's the thing I like most about the truck considering I didn't get the V8. The thing is, despite the aluminum body on the 2015 being lighter, yada, yada, I still can't buy a better equipped truck in a regular cab. The regular cab is only offered in XLT poverty configuration. I have neither use nor desire for bigger truck, nor do I require more power in my daily use. Excluding the issue of weight for the newer trucks, what I have is the best I'm going to get in a regular cab, option wise.
I have quite an affinity for the 3.7L based on my experience with it in the F-150. It is my choice of engine in a second Mustang. I will not be coerced, cajoled or upsold into an engine that I don't want over an available engine that I know I like.
P.S. Trackey does not add any horsepower to the Boss.
I have quite an affinity for the 3.7L based on my experience with it in the F-150. It is my choice of engine in a second Mustang. I will not be coerced, cajoled or upsold into an engine that I don't want over an available engine that I know I like.
P.S. Trackey does not add any horsepower to the Boss.
The 3.7 isn't a bad motor.
I said the track key makes a difference not hat it made more hp.
I didn't say the red key added power.. maybe read a post before agreeing...
Oh thank you. Thank you for appointing yourself the decider of what is right and what is wrong. That is exactly what the internet needed. You have done us a great service. I guess that video of a 93 tune increasing the Mustang by only 7 hp was wrong too. You should go over to youtube and insist that they take it down. Or you could stay here and split more hairs about NA vs forced induction as though you are the only one who understands the difference. lol
We are indeed fortunate to have the knower of all things here.
We are indeed fortunate to have the knower of all things here.
Its not splitting hairs to point out the glaring difference between a NA car and a boosted car.
Oh we are truly blessed. Not only are you the decider of what is right and what is wrong but you have also appointed yourself the decider of what sucks and what doesn't suck. How has the world managed without you?
Absolutely, I'll get right on that. lmao In the meantime maybe you could learn to start sentence with a capital letter like the rest of the english speaking world.
Last edited by White2010; Oct 3, 2014 at 12:15 AM.
well you are talking about it.. shouldn't you know what you are talking about? Also know that tunes are not simply about peak hp & tq.. drivability and how the motor makes power is as important.
god forbid some one ask you to read and learn.
here.. pictures
god forbid some one ask you to read and learn.
here.. pictures
Last edited by Flagstang; Oct 3, 2014 at 12:16 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM





