2012-2013 BOSS 302

New Boss Tests and Reviews - Post 'em here

Old Mar 3, 2011 | 09:30 AM
  #181  
Mus408's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2010
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
The OEM suspension is what it is. But what caught my concern was the mention of shifting issues with the trans.
But given all this...if you had $50,000 large to spend,would you buy the new Boss or a "typical" '69-'70 Boss 302,that you would see in your local show/cruise-ins.... not BJ auction prices.??
I'd guess it would be, which one would put a bigger grin on your face!
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 09:37 AM
  #182  
PTRocks's Avatar
Thread Starter
FR500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2008
Posts: 3,352
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, UK
They didn't mention what setting the shocks were set to. This will become yet another point of discussion for each review.
Reply
Old Mar 3, 2011 | 09:48 AM
  #183  
cloud9's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by PTRocks
They didn't mention what setting the shocks were set to. This will become yet another point of discussion for each review.
True enough. Given the supplement recommends 5 on the regular Boss and up to 5 depending on track conditions for the Laguna Seca, I would think they'd have been firmer than 2 but who knows for sure.
Reply
Old Mar 5, 2011 | 03:10 PM
  #184  
dean_acheson's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2010
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: Mid-West
http://www.boss302.com/smf/index.php?topic=52412.0

Best review I've read yet.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:28 AM
  #185  
1FAFP90's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2006
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Motor Trend

http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/index.html
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:44 AM
  #186  
LQQK's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 7, 2010
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by 1FAFP90
0-60 4.0!!!

ACCELERATION TO MPH
0-30 1.6 sec
0-40 2.3
0-50 3.1
0-60 4.0
0-70 5.0
0-80 6.2
0-90 7.6
0-100 9.2
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 1.6
QUARTER MILE 12.3 sec @ 115.8 mph
BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 108 ft
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.98 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 24.7 sec @ 0.78 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 2000 rpm
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:46 AM
  #187  
StillIntense's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 22, 2010
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant, SC
0 to 60 in 4 flat and 12.3 @ 115 in the quarter? Are you kidding me? That's right with a new GT500!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 10:59 AM
  #188  
phytrpilot's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2010
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Article actually said 3.97 secs for 0-60.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:04 AM
  #189  
1FAFP90's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2006
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
If you watch the video on page two, at the very end it mentions the lap times:
GT500 1:44.32
M3 .... 1:42.96
R8 ..... 1:40.75
Boss.... 1:40.21 (they said sub 1:40 with the LS, so call it 1:39.7 or so)
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:05 AM
  #190  
MJockey's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: February 12, 2011
Posts: 364
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by 1FAFP90
Got to love it. I like the end of video 2.
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...DzpROVE-LmoVPa

Lap times: GT500 - 1:44.32, M3 - 1:42.96, R8 - 1:40.75
Boss 302 - 1:40.21

Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:08 AM
  #191  
LQQK's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 7, 2010
Posts: 1,089
Likes: 0
From: Earth
Originally Posted by LQQK
0-60 4.0!!!

ACCELERATION TO MPH
0-30 1.6 sec
0-40 2.3
0-50 3.1
0-60 4.0
0-70 5.0
0-80 6.2
0-90 7.6
0-100 9.2
PASSING, 45-65 MPH 1.6
QUARTER MILE 12.3 sec @ 115.8 mph
BRAKING, 60-0 MPH 108 ft
LATERAL ACCELERATION 0.98 g (avg)
MT FIGURE EIGHT 24.7 sec @ 0.78 g (avg)
TOP-GEAR REVS @ 60 MPH 2000 rpm
GT500.

0-60: 4.1
1/4: 12.35 @ 115.75
60-0: 103.83
Skidpad: 1.01g
Fig 8: 24.0 @ 0.82 avg



Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:15 AM
  #192  
ewingfly's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2005
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: Detroit
As per the article that GT500 time is of the 2010. Has anyone done the 2011 there?
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:21 AM
  #193  
Dean#4AI's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: October 21, 2004
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Warsaw, IN
Originally Posted by 1FAFP90
Interesting little tidbit from one of their videos.
Attached Thumbnails New Boss Tests and Reviews - Post 'em here-boss-lap-times.jpg  

Last edited by Dean#4AI; Mar 7, 2011 at 11:29 AM. Reason: Image problems......
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 11:35 AM
  #194  
06GT's Avatar
 
Joined: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 6
MT always has some hotshoes to do a car justice...AWESOME
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:02 PM
  #195  
cloud9's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by Dean#4AI
Interesting little tidbit from one of their videos.
This is the best news of all!!!!!!
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:09 PM
  #196  
1FAFP90's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2006
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cloud9
This is the best news of all!!!!!!
No.... the best news is that their test results were not from the LS I'm guessing that, all things being equal, the LS would be about half a sec quicker.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:21 PM
  #197  
cloud9's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by 1FAFP90
No.... the best news is that their test results were not from the LS I'm guessing that, all things being equal, the LS would be about half a sec quicker.
The only way to know for sure is to meet up and find out
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:30 PM
  #198  
1FAFP90's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2006
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cloud9
The only way to know for sure is to meet up and find out
That wouldn't be equal -- you're a better driver than I
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:34 PM
  #199  
cloud9's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: November 20, 2010
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 1
From: Sioux Falls, SD
Originally Posted by 1FAFP90
That wouldn't be equal -- you're a better driver than I
We can all be Parnelli Jones on the internet. I was actually thrilled to see those numbers were with the regular Boss. No doubt the Laguna Seca will be even faster just from the R-comps if nothing else.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2011 | 12:36 PM
  #200  
StillIntense's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 22, 2010
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: Mount Pleasant, SC
I was talking to one of the drivers at Rehagen Racing two weeks ago. He stated that he actually preferred the regular Boss over the Laguna Seca. He said that the LS felt like "too long out front", implying to me that he could induce oversteer in the regular Boss more easily. Interesting...
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 PM.