To Airaid or not
So Adam, just curious why you would think the order of testing would manipulate the test results? And I realize here that you are not a dyno expert but why would you think testing the AirRaid first or second would influence the results?
That would be like putting your car on the dyno, making a pull with the black key and then making another pull immediately afterward having restarted the car with trackkey. Other than the under-load heating the engine may have experienced during the first pull, which if you want leave the fans on the car for 10 minutes between runs, what’s the difference?
The dyno graphs and results posted show no gain. What is to be explained??
That would be like putting your car on the dyno, making a pull with the black key and then making another pull immediately afterward having restarted the car with trackkey. Other than the under-load heating the engine may have experienced during the first pull, which if you want leave the fans on the car for 10 minutes between runs, what’s the difference?
The dyno graphs and results posted show no gain. What is to be explained??
The OP ran the Airaid intake for 200 miles and then drove with it installed to the dyno. He took it off, installed the stock one, and put it on the dyno without letting the car settle itself to that intake...
I am not making excuses for the results. Just posting what I know....even if it may be wrong.... However I am not a pro and hopefully someone that is will chime in....
I think the best way to determine something like this is at the track. For example back in October when I was at VIR would have been the perfect time. There was a mobile dyno there. Run a session with say the black key (Having driven the car with the black key only before the event as well). Let the car cool down and put it on the dyno. Run the red key for two sessions. Let the car cool down and then put it on the dyno.
Not exactly an easy thing to duplicate but there it is..... My plan to dyno the Trackey is this:
Take the car in the morning to the dyno and have it dyno'd. Go install trackey. Drive around for about 100-150 "spirited" driven miles. Take it back to the dyno. All on the same day. The weather should be negligible at this time of the year here. It may not be 100% accurate with exact number but we should see if there is an approximate change....
Originally Posted by adam81
From what I understand the car needs a little time to adjust itself after you install a major component like an intake. Same would ring true for the TK.
The OP ran the Airaid intake for 200 miles and then drove with it installed to the dyno. He took it off, installed the stock one, and put it on the dyno without letting the car settle itself to that intake...
I am not making excuses for the results. Just posting what I know....even if it may be wrong.... However I am not a pro and hopefully someone that is will chime in....
I think the best way to determine something like this is at the track. For example back in October when I was at VIR would have been the perfect time. There was a mobile dyno there. Run a session with say the black key (Having driven the car with the black key only before the event as well). Let the car cool down and put it on the dyno. Run the red key for two sessions. Let the car cool down and then put it on the dyno.
Not exactly an easy thing to duplicate but there it is..... My plan to dyno the Trackey is this:
Take the car in the morning to the dyno and have it dyno'd. Go install trackey. Drive around for about 100-150 "spirited" driven miles. Take it back to the dyno. All on the same day. The weather should be negligible at this time of the year here. It may not be 100% accurate with exact number but we should see if there is an approximate change....
This was the first and probably only Boss he'll see and as such has not had much time with the Boss' computer system and the adaptive logic and dyno'd the car as he would any other pre '12 Mustang with the presumption that if you change a part and run the car the results reported are directly related to the part. The car did put down 397 corrected hp and 356 lb ft of torque but whether this was due the intake, heat soak, cold, loaded, unloaded is not for sure.
I am optimistic about the Airaid system delivering the stated hp gain and will post the results following Airaids dyno procedures.
Thanks for your help David.
In for more results
Quick update. Just spoke with Airaid and I will be taking the Boss back in and will follow their dyno procedure. Questions have arisen about the amount of time the Boss had to learn the stock vs Airaid intake system given the amount of time each intake was used on the car. The Boss has 5,500 miles on it and is broken in. It was and is drive spiritedly. The car was driven 200 miles with the Airaid then dyno'd on a Dynojet with outside temps of 60.
This was the first and probably only Boss he'll see and as such has not had much time with the Boss' computer system and the adaptive logic and dyno'd the car as he would any other pre '12 Mustang with the presumption that if you change a part and run the car the results reported are directly related to the part. The car did put down 397 corrected hp and 356 lb ft of torque but whether this was due the intake, heat soak, cold, loaded, unloaded is not for sure.
I am optimistic about the Airaid system delivering the stated hp gain and will post the results following Airaids dyno procedures.
Thanks for your help David.
This was the first and probably only Boss he'll see and as such has not had much time with the Boss' computer system and the adaptive logic and dyno'd the car as he would any other pre '12 Mustang with the presumption that if you change a part and run the car the results reported are directly related to the part. The car did put down 397 corrected hp and 356 lb ft of torque but whether this was due the intake, heat soak, cold, loaded, unloaded is not for sure.
I am optimistic about the Airaid system delivering the stated hp gain and will post the results following Airaids dyno procedures.
Thanks for your help David.
Last edited by adam81; Nov 8, 2011 at 12:33 PM.
I echo Adam's thanks as well for leading the Boss fleet in trying out this new intake. I too am interested in the induction system but knowing how the Ford engineering team squeezed every last Hp out of the RoadRunner engine, I was a bit skeptical. They book kept even fractions of a Hp relative to the Coyote baseline during development.
Adam, I think your VIR plan for back to back comparisons certainly sounds reasonable. To do comparative testing within a short time frame so as to minimize atmospheric condition fluctuations is key. Something which you obviously recognize.
I do however believe many owners over exaggerate the PCM adaptive software logic timeframe necessary. Computers have come a long way in the last 5 years and I do not believe it takes anywhere close to 200 miles to "learn" driving patterns for engine control. I think this is owner wishful thinking hoping things change for the better.
Undoubtedly the calibration starts at a baseline value developed by Ford to be reasonably close to a "norm". And then this value (whatever it is) is tweaked by observing driving behavior by some small amount about either side of the norm built into the software. Thus I would not think big changes occur due to this learning. Emissions certification might be compromised if the learning did much to the EPA certification values. (And undoubtedly the certification efforts look at the + and - bands around the norm to assure compliance). I am told by Ford engineers on circa 2006 MOD5.4 engines that the control logic in the adaptive mode could be accomplished in 25 miles. I would think it even shorter in duration in 2011.
Adam, I think your VIR plan for back to back comparisons certainly sounds reasonable. To do comparative testing within a short time frame so as to minimize atmospheric condition fluctuations is key. Something which you obviously recognize.
I do however believe many owners over exaggerate the PCM adaptive software logic timeframe necessary. Computers have come a long way in the last 5 years and I do not believe it takes anywhere close to 200 miles to "learn" driving patterns for engine control. I think this is owner wishful thinking hoping things change for the better.
Undoubtedly the calibration starts at a baseline value developed by Ford to be reasonably close to a "norm". And then this value (whatever it is) is tweaked by observing driving behavior by some small amount about either side of the norm built into the software. Thus I would not think big changes occur due to this learning. Emissions certification might be compromised if the learning did much to the EPA certification values. (And undoubtedly the certification efforts look at the + and - bands around the norm to assure compliance). I am told by Ford engineers on circa 2006 MOD5.4 engines that the control logic in the adaptive mode could be accomplished in 25 miles. I would think it even shorter in duration in 2011.
Quick update. Just spoke with Airaid and I will be taking the Boss back in and will follow their dyno procedure. Questions have arisen about the amount of time the Boss had to learn the stock vs Airaid intake system given the amount of time each intake was used on the car. The Boss has 5,500 miles on it and is broken in. It was and is drive spiritedly. The car was driven 200 miles with the Airaid then dyno'd on a Dynojet with outside temps of 60.
This was the first and probably only Boss he'll see and as such has not had much time with the Boss' computer system and the adaptive logic and dyno'd the car as he would any other pre '12 Mustang with the presumption that if you change a part and run the car the results reported are directly related to the part. The car did put down 397 corrected hp and 356 lb ft of torque but whether this was due the intake, heat soak, cold, loaded, unloaded is not for sure.
I am optimistic about the Airaid system delivering the stated hp gain and will post the results following Airaids dyno procedures.
Thanks for your help David.
This was the first and probably only Boss he'll see and as such has not had much time with the Boss' computer system and the adaptive logic and dyno'd the car as he would any other pre '12 Mustang with the presumption that if you change a part and run the car the results reported are directly related to the part. The car did put down 397 corrected hp and 356 lb ft of torque but whether this was due the intake, heat soak, cold, loaded, unloaded is not for sure.
I am optimistic about the Airaid system delivering the stated hp gain and will post the results following Airaids dyno procedures.
Thanks for your help David.
Thank you for the clarification and your honesty!
Thanks,
David
We need a paypal donation to help with cost of testing!
Time to set aside and money for Dyno doesn't come easy, what were the action or procedures you followed to see a gain? Do you have graphs from your test?
Very interested in Airaid!
Time to set aside and money for Dyno doesn't come easy, what were the action or procedures you followed to see a gain? Do you have graphs from your test?
Very interested in Airaid!
Originally Posted by UnrealFord
We need a paypal donation to help with cost of testing!
Time to set aside and money for Dyno doesn't come easy, what were the action or procedures you followed to see a gain? Do you have graphs from your test?
Very interested in Airaid!
Time to set aside and money for Dyno doesn't come easy, what were the action or procedures you followed to see a gain? Do you have graphs from your test?
Very interested in Airaid!
Inquiring mind wants to know... learn what? The CAI is supposed to deliver more and cooler air into the engine. What's there to "learn"? Either more air enters the engine -> more power... or it doesn't.
But I'll keep an eye out for the new dyno results.
But I'll keep an eye out for the new dyno results.
Quick update. Just spoke with Airaid and I will be taking the Boss back in and will follow their dyno procedure. Questions have arisen about the amount of time the Boss had to learn the stock vs Airaid intake system given the amount of time each intake was used on the car. The Boss has 5,500 miles on it and is broken in. It was and is drive spiritedly. The car was driven 200 miles with the Airaid then dyno'd on a Dynojet with outside temps of 60.
This was the first and probably only Boss he'll see and as such has not had much time with the Boss' computer system and the adaptive logic and dyno'd the car as he would any other pre '12 Mustang with the presumption that if you change a part and run the car the results reported are directly related to the part. The car did put down 397 corrected hp and 356 lb ft of torque but whether this was due the intake, heat soak, cold, loaded, unloaded is not for sure.
I am optimistic about the Airaid system delivering the stated hp gain and will post the results following Airaids dyno procedures.
Thanks for your help David.
This was the first and probably only Boss he'll see and as such has not had much time with the Boss' computer system and the adaptive logic and dyno'd the car as he would any other pre '12 Mustang with the presumption that if you change a part and run the car the results reported are directly related to the part. The car did put down 397 corrected hp and 356 lb ft of torque but whether this was due the intake, heat soak, cold, loaded, unloaded is not for sure.
I am optimistic about the Airaid system delivering the stated hp gain and will post the results following Airaids dyno procedures.
Thanks for your help David.


Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Originally Posted by cloud9
Interestingly similar results on mine (stock airbox) and I know it's different dynos and different days, but my SAE corrected #s are almost identical. Must be a CO thing 
Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Last edited by 69mustangman; Nov 8, 2011 at 04:44 PM. Reason: spelling correction
SILVER!!!
Not yet. Funds I allocated for the dyno were shifted (bought my wife her Christmas present). I had hoped that Airaid would publish the results of their dyno testing of the Boss and the TracKey that Dave said they were testing last month.




