2012-2013 BOSS 302

13 Boss Price Increase

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 6, 2012 | 09:31 AM
  #41  
SoCalBoss's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: April 11, 2011
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: So Cal
Originally Posted by askjeffro
Hate to break it to you, but there is significantly more room in my WRX then there is in a Mustang, especially in the back seat, which is exactly why I got the WRX over the 'stang. The Mustang's size is larger, but that does not translate into interior space, its for the long hood and motor.

Looked it up: Passenger Volume Mustang: 83 ft3 (2 door) WRX:94 ft3 (4 door) Luggage Volume Mustang: 13 ft3 (2 door) WRX: 19 ft3 (4 door)
I agree. I have both the mustang and the WRX and the WRX is more comfortable for 4 adults than the mustang.

And to get back on topic, I think the price increase is reasonable for the upgrades that come with 2013. I would have paid the extra amount if those were options for the 2012.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 12:04 PM
  #42  
ace72ace's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 13, 2011
Posts: 1,399
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
Originally Posted by PACETTR
Based on his statement and the facts at hand I'm not sure what other conclusion to draw...?

Idiot was a bit strong but he should know that prices ALWAYS increase from MY to MY.
Uninformed? Yes.

Id 10 T No.



But a 2k Price increase as reported today on this link?! A new 2013 seems a little less likely to appear in my garage...

http://www.motorauthority.com/news/1...mustang-models
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2012 | 05:37 PM
  #43  
AtillaEsq's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: September 2, 2011
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Originally Posted by SoCalBoss
I think the price increase is reasonable for the upgrades that come with 2013. I would have paid the extra amount if those were options for the 2012.
I think the price increase is reasonable and I am very happy I canceled the 2012 (4th Q) and ordered the 2013 (2nd Q). I am not getting a Laguna Seca, so it doesn't matter to me, but am I the only one that thinks that 2013 LS buyers are kinda getting screwed because of the lack of a gauge pod? It makes the regular Boss seem like a better deal since they both went up bu $1,900.00....I don't know that I would go for the 2013 LS even if I could get one for the same deal I have on the regular Boss. On a bang for the buck basis, the LS is getting too close to the 2012 GT500, 2012 ZL1, and the 2013 GT500. I think the regular boss is still a pretty good deal.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2012 | 06:08 PM
  #44  
GT_350's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: August 28, 2006
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by askjeffro
I still believe you are misrepresenting costs that are sunk as variable which to me is in-congruent with accounting practice. The costs you are listing are not inherently more than the previous model year, therefore not necessarily the driver of increased cost. Again, the enhancements (Sync vs No Sync, HID vs Halogen, etc) and inflation are the primary drivers of the cost increase, not a redesigned hood etc.

Regardless, I'm sure no one else on here cares to read us go back and forth and I certainly don't appreciate your attitude of calling me a moron and am going to stop responding as its clear a civil discussion is beyond you. Goodnight.
In my day job as a Budget Analyst I agree with your statements...........
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2012 | 09:11 PM
  #45  
askjeffro's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 8, 2011
Posts: 542
Likes: 1
From: CO
Originally Posted by AtillaEsq
I think the price increase is reasonable and I am very happy I canceled the 2012 (4th Q) and ordered the 2013 (2nd Q). I am not getting a Laguna Seca, so it doesn't matter to me, but am I the only one that thinks that 2013 LS buyers are kinda getting screwed because of the lack of a gauge pod? It makes the regular Boss seem like a better deal since they both went up bu $1,900.00....I don't know that I would go for the 2013 LS even if I could get one for the same deal I have on the regular Boss. On a bang for the buck basis, the LS is getting too close to the 2012 GT500, 2012 ZL1, and the 2013 GT500. I think the regular boss is still a pretty good deal.

I'm right there with you, the LS is less special in '13 trim (still sweet though). I originally only wanted to go LS, but I ave now downshifted to getting a "plain" Boss for better bang for buck and availability issues.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2012 | 09:12 PM
  #46  
askjeffro's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: January 8, 2011
Posts: 542
Likes: 1
From: CO
Originally Posted by GT_350
In my day job as a Budget Analyst I agree with your statements...........
Truly appreciate the support, but lets not bring that up again!
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 05:49 AM
  #47  
Locke62's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 20, 2011
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
You guys are priceless . As I was reading I was laughing so hard I started crying. I really didn't think the car would stay the same price. It seems to me the extra items on the 2013 is what mostly drove the price up. Both you guys make good points though. Fords actual cost on the upgrades does not correlate to that much of an increase. It is still a hot item and they feel they can get away with it. It's all Marketing and supply and demand. We shall see how it works out
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 05:34 PM
  #48  
cocojoe53's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 15, 2005
Posts: 62
Likes: 0
Simply put.....It's a very large price increase on a carry-over model with declining sales
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2012 | 07:15 PM
  #49  
bluesun's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: October 29, 2011
Posts: 39
Likes: 0
Ford sold all they made and they will this year too. Dealers that get them may not sell them at as great a profit as they made last year, but they don't have to order them if they don't want to.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Automagically
2012-2013 BOSS 302
37
Feb 19, 2020 09:28 PM
50Cal
GT
6
Sep 16, 2015 03:54 PM
tj@steeda
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
0
Sep 8, 2015 10:45 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:24 AM.