2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang

Under the hood of the 2015 (Photo Gallery)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/16/14, 05:06 PM
  #21  
Legacy TMS Member
 
unnoticedtrails's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 27, 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,450
Received 56 Likes on 45 Posts
A friend's article caught the Turbo 4 engine bay!
Old 1/16/14, 05:36 PM
  #22  
Team Mustang Source
 
montreal ponies's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anybody noticed the now famous "prop rod" . C'mon Ford, you've got to be kiddin' !!!!!!!
Total FAIL if this makes it to final production .
Old 1/16/14, 05:42 PM
  #23  
Mach 1 Member
 
newpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 24, 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by montreal ponies
Has anybody noticed the now famous "prop rod" . C'mon Ford, you've got to be kiddin' !!!!!!! Total FAIL if this makes it to final production .
Got to leave something retro for the old folks
Old 1/16/14, 06:19 PM
  #24  
Team Mustang Source
 
montreal ponies's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by newpony
Got to leave something retro for the old folks
Oh c'mon now, even my '69 Mach1 hood hinges worked better. It' outdated period.
Old 1/16/14, 07:35 PM
  #25  
Mach 1 Member
 
newpony's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 24, 2010
Location: MA
Posts: 873
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by montreal ponies
Oh c'mon now, even my '69 Mach1 hood hinges worked better. It' outdated period.
I agree with you and hopefully Ford get rid of them. It was just a poke for people here that are against change and want everything to stay as 1964 ;-)
Old 1/16/14, 09:22 PM
  #26  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by montreal ponies
Has anybody noticed the now famous "prop rod" . C'mon Ford, you've got to be kiddin' !!!!!!! Total FAIL if this makes it to final production .
You can thank Jay Leno for that...
Old 1/16/14, 09:37 PM
  #27  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Man, it looks tight in there! I'd really be surprised to see the big 5.8 or an Ecoboost twin turbo V8 in there. If Ford does any kind of forced induction on the V8 its most likely going to be a supercharger due to what looks like space issues and the attendant heat problems.
Old 1/17/14, 07:07 AM
  #28  
Mach 1 Member
 
Moustang's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2012
Location: Suburbs of Dallas
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Originally Posted by Boomer
Look closer.

Brighten up the image, it's there.

Perhaps.........

But what about this one?



That's nice and brightly lit. I see a brace on the passenger side, but nothing on the driver's side.
Old 1/17/14, 10:02 AM
  #29  
Mach 1 Member
 
xlover's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 10, 2009
Location: Boston
Posts: 956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moustang
Perhaps.........

But what about this one?



That's nice and brightly lit. I see a brace on the passenger side, but nothing on the driver's side.
looks like it was removed for whatever reason as the bolts are there sticking up but without the brace. I am not gonna read into this too much. as these are pre-production cars, its pretty clear they don't even have a final design for the coolant reservoir.

also there are two braces on the yellow GT PPcar, its hard to see requires a big monitor and brightness and contrast turned up a bit

Last edited by xlover; 1/17/14 at 10:16 AM.
Old 1/19/14, 08:58 PM
  #30  
Bullitt Member
 
blksn8k's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 12, 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Speaking of old school, those strut tower braces look a helluva lot like the ones on my '70 Mach 1. On the old cars the OEM braces were individual pieces that tied the shock towers into the firewall. They were bolted in place on both ends and therefore removable for access to the valve covers, etc. An upgrade was a one-piece brace that was more of a V shape and was known as an export brace.
Old 1/19/14, 10:33 PM
  #31  
Mach 1 Member
 
=HYPERDRIVE='s Avatar
 
Join Date: February 5, 2012
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts
oh boy, prepare yourself for fartcanpalooza with that 4 banger
Old 1/20/14, 06:37 AM
  #32  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by =HYPERDRIVE=
oh boy, prepare yourself for fartcanpalooza with that 4 banger
The real reason Ford put the Ecoboost 4 in there so they could mitigate that. A turbocharger is great for muffling sound.

Now a CAI with one of those things that makes a turbo whistle no such luck.
Old 1/20/14, 09:34 AM
  #33  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by Moustang
Perhaps.........

But what about this one?

.
They pulled it off and threw it at the guy who keeps asking about the missing strut tower braces.

Calm down over there.
Old 1/20/14, 10:44 AM
  #34  
GT Member
 
ninjacrooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 25, 2012
Posts: 107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bob
Man, it looks tight in there! I'd really be surprised to see the big 5.8 or an Ecoboost twin turbo V8 in there. If Ford does any kind of forced induction on the V8 its most likely going to be a supercharger due to what looks like space issues and the attendant heat problems.
There would be nothing "Eco" about a a twin turbo v8. Let's think before we write. Ford will not do that.
Old 1/20/14, 03:57 PM
  #35  
Bullitt Member
 
ctodd1's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 17, 2014
Location: Fort Lauderdale , FL
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
First Glimpse of the 2.3-liter EcoBoost Engine
http://www.autoevolution.com/news/20...deo-75050.html
Old 1/20/14, 04:50 PM
  #36  
Cobra Member
 
Ajcruz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2, 2013
Posts: 1,061
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ninjacrooks

There would be nothing "Eco" about a a twin turbo v8. Let's think before we write. Ford will not do that.
lmao
Old 1/20/14, 08:30 PM
  #37  
Legacy TMS Member
 
unnoticedtrails's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 27, 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,450
Received 56 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by ctodd1
First Glimpse of the 2.3-liter EcoBoost Engine
http://www.autoevolution.com/news/20...deo-75050.html
Sorry, already been mentioned.
Originally Posted by unnoticedtrails
A friend's article caught the Turbo 4 engine bay!
Old 1/21/14, 08:40 AM
  #38  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by ninjacrooks
There would be nothing "Eco" about a a twin turbo v8. Let's think before we write. Ford will not do that.

That's what people love calling anything turbo from Ford these days, and some people definitely are in love with the idea of a Ecoboost SVT car sporting little green Ecoboost badges.


Anyways I stand by my observation, I don't see a twin turbo V8 happening with the current V8 in this chassis.

Maybe chop some stroke, yank some bore and pull the deck down a fair bit along with shrinking the cylinder heads for a more compact V8 and it might happen.




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 AM.