2015 - 2023 MUSTANG Discuss everything 2015-2023 S550 Mustang

Trinity Engine Is Not Dead Yet!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/11/13, 05:24 AM
  #41  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
mustang_lurkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Keep in my that no matter what SVT does it will have an one of a kind engine that is not used in any other ford product. A flat plane crank engine is totally different even if it used a coyote block. It would need other changes to rotate at much higher rpms. A twin turbo coyote would also be very different also and would require a lot of unique components for the application. Ford has never built a flat-plane engine or made a twin turbo V-8 engine before and they will need time to perfect the engines that they decide to go with. Ford will not just simply slap a supercharger on a coyote engine and say here you go SVT buyers. SVT has always offered a level of exclusivity to their buyers. Older SVT cars who shared the same block had 4v per cylinder heads vice 2v per cylinder or forged internals with a supercharger vice cast internals and no supercharger or bigger displacement, forged internals and a supercharger, vice smaller displacement, cast internals and no supercharger. The new coyote will be a boss 302 like engine, have forged internals and 4v per cyl with advanced cam phasing. If SVT takes it and then slaps a supercharger on it there would be no exclusivity and everyone would turn their nose up at buying one and just buy a GT and have a supercharger put on it. The GT can be bought now with 6 piston brembo brakes, track pack, has a diffuser a chin spoiler etc. The SVT will need something to make it special in comparison to the GT or it will not sell. I have not said the "Trinity" will not go away I am just saying that it will remain a couple more years. There are major magazines like Road and Track and Car and Driver who share the same opinion If I eat crow I will not be eating it alone. Sure if there was a twin turbo coyote available now in the SVT I would buy it and STFU so if it happens I will eat crow and STFU. You heard it from me guys. We will see who eats crow in a few months.

Last edited by mustang_lurkers; 12/11/13 at 07:38 AM. Reason: missing word.
mustang_lurkers is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 06:13 AM
  #42  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Never made a twin turbo engine? The 3.5 Ecoboost V6 would like to have a word with you...
Overboost is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 06:26 AM
  #43  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
conv_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mustang_lurkers
Keep in my that no matter what SVT does it will have an one of a kind engine that is not used in any other ford product. A flat plane crank engine is totally different even if it used a coyote block. It would need other changes to rotate at much higher rpms. A twin turbo coyote would also be very different also and would require a lot of unique components for the application. Ford has never built a flat-plane engine or made a twin turbo engine before and they will need time to perfect the engines that they decide to go with. Ford will not just simply slap a supercharger on a coyote engine and say here you go SVT buyers. SVT has always offered a level of exclusivity to their buyers. Older SVT cars who shared the same block had 4v per cylinder heads vice 2v per cylinder or forged internals with a supercharger vice cast internals and no supercharger or bigger displacement, forged internals and a supercharger, vice smaller displacement, cast internals and no supercharger. The new coyote will be a boss 302 like engine, have forged internals and 4v per cyl with advanced cam phasing. If SVT takes it and then slaps a supercharger on it there would be no exclusivity and everyone would turn their nose up at buying one and just buy a GT and have a supercharger put on it. The GT can be bought now with 6 piston brembo brakes, track pack, has a diffuser a chin spoiler etc. The SVT will need something to make it special in comparison to the GT or it will not sell. I have not said the "Trinity" will not go away I am just saying that it will remain a couple more years. There are major magazines like Road and Track and Car and Driver who share the same opinion If I eat crow I will not be eating it alone. Sure if there was a twin turbo coyote available now in the SVT I would buy it and STFU so if it happens I will eat crow and STFU. You heard it from me guys. We will see who eats crow in a few months.
Yes bc the car magazines are as knowledgable as weathermen and about as correct. The 5.8 is the first truly unique to SVT engine. All previous versions all the way back to 93 shared basic engine components. Down to the 4.6 and 5.4 blocks. To complete engines with Lincoln's and Mercury's. Mark VIII had a detuned 4.6 4V. The 5.4 in the older Shelby's is very similar to the Lightning engine just with 4V heads. The SVT is about the entire package not where the engine came from. Without the interior, wheels, suspension, aero package etc....it would just be a GT with more power. You actually think people won't buy a Shelby bc it comes with a fully forged Coyote motor with boost? I've owned a 93, still own my 98 and owned an 04. They all shared engine components with lower models and wee all great cars. The 5.8 is old tech goes back to the orig 4.6 mod motors. It's easier for Ford to fit a bored/stroked Coyote or simply twin turbos than it is to modify everything to fit the physically taller 5.8 block and then add the blower on top of that. They already had to make the intake on the Coyote lower to clear the hood. Easier and cheaper to bend pipes to fit for turbos than to come up with 8 or so inches of clearance to fit the Trinity. In reality if Ford was gonna use the Trinity they would've announced the SVT version just like they did with the 2010. Whenever Ford has major engine or chassis changes they wait a year or two for the SVT versions. Like after 2001 they didn't have another until 2003, and the same for 2005. They waited til 2007. When the engines are mostly carryover there is no gap in production. 93-94. 98-99, 09-10, 10-11(aluminum block change) and 12-13(basically bored up 5.4 and bigger blower)

Last edited by conv_stang; 12/11/13 at 06:37 AM.
conv_stang is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 07:37 AM
  #44  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
mustang_lurkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Gentlemen,
we will see what comes as time passes. At least wait to post things that add to the speculation such as inputs from car magazines, or posts from Ford Engineers and Execs. So far the "Voodoo" engine is a myth like bigfoot or the greay Aliens at area 51. There is nothing to convince me about the death of the "Trinity" engine but sheer speculation that is less than what the car magazine weathermen are predicting.
mustang_lurkers is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 07:39 AM
  #45  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
mustang_lurkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
....
Originally Posted by Overboost
Never made a twin turbo engine? The 3.5 Ecoboost V6 would like to have a word with you...

Last edited by mustang_lurkers; 12/11/13 at 08:02 AM. Reason: ....
mustang_lurkers is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 07:43 AM
  #46  
Post *****
 
Evil_Capri's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,153
Received 72 Likes on 65 Posts
Originally Posted by mustang_lurkers

Error has been corrected. Never made a twin turbo V-8
In Concept form they have . . . . http://www.topspeed.com/cars/ford/20...-ar137223.html


Last edited by Evil_Capri; 12/11/13 at 07:44 AM.
Evil_Capri is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 08:00 AM
  #47  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
mustang_lurkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
"I've owned a 93, still own my 98 and owned an 04. They all shared engine components with lower models and wee all great cars."

The 1998 Cobra engine was totally different from the GT engine. The cobra engine was all aluminum, had a forged crank, much better 4v heads, better intake and exhuast. They didn't share as many common components as you think.
mustang_lurkers is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 08:48 AM
  #48  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mustang_lurkers
Gentlemen,
we will see what comes as time passes. At least wait to post things that add to the speculation such as inputs from car magazines, or posts from Ford Engineers and Execs. So far the "Voodoo" engine is a myth like bigfoot or the greay Aliens at area 51. There is nothing to convince me about the death of the "Trinity" engine but sheer speculation that is less than what the car magazine weathermen are predicting.
There is plenty done at this point. You don't facilitate a major change in a few months. From design, validation, and testing, those parts take quite a bit of time to get done.

Look at the timetable released on S550 development. They started in 2010 on this, and we're still not even close to production yet. It'll be nearly 4 years until the first production intent, saleable car rolls off the line.
Overboost is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 09:11 AM
  #49  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 16 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by conv_stang
The 5.4 in the older Shelby's is very similar to the Lightning engine just with 4V heads.

Just the block, the 5.4 Lightning wishes it had GT500 guts.


It's easier for Ford to fit a bored/stroked Coyote or simply twin turbos than it is to modify everything to fit the physically taller 5.8 block and then add the blower on top of that.

Hmmmm..... I'm not so sure about that, slapping two turbos in the engine compartment presents a lot of issues that you don't have with a supercharger. The stacked height of the supercharged 5.8 is easier to deal with, especially when your talking a cramped engine compartment and under hood heat issues.

Last edited by bob; 12/11/13 at 09:23 AM.
bob is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 09:24 AM
  #50  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
mustang_lurkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Overboost
There is plenty done at this point. You don't facilitate a major change in a few months. From design, validation, and testing, those parts take quite a bit of time to get done.

Look at the timetable released on S550 development. They started in 2010 on this, and we're still not even close to production yet. It'll be nearly 4 years until the first production intent, saleable car rolls off the line.
Well if you are right and there will be a twin turbo "voodoo" engine I would be just as happy because the "voodoo" engine sounds like it will be an awesome engine. I will make this debate a little more interesting. If the S550 debuts with the "Twin Turbo" voodoo engine I will buy it and post a picture of me with it dressed in a fairy costume sprinkling fairy dust and holding a magic wand. If it debuts with the "Trinity" engine I will buy one and post a picture of it with me holding a sign that states "boomer and overboost eats crow" If it comes out with a coyote engine with a bolt on supercharger I won't buy it and I will continue to wait until the MACH 1 or some other special edition with more comes out.
mustang_lurkers is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 09:28 AM
  #51  
GTR Member
 
Twin Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 18, 2006
Location: England
Posts: 5,552
Received 11 Likes on 8 Posts
If it comes with a Twin Turbo engine, they'd better give me one free of charge
Twin Turbo is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 09:35 AM
  #52  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Have you even bothered to search for Voodoo and seen what rumors are out there? Your arguments don't even make sense when you read into those.
Overboost is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 10:21 AM
  #53  
Cobra Member
 
2 Go Snake's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,265
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Smile

I am loving this thread. Speculation about the possibility of the 5.8 liter in the new Mustang is exciting. Ford has not said they will discontinue the engine. Now , some say the 5.8 will fit in the new Mustang. If a 5.8 liter with the current supercharger fits in the new Mustang, I hope Ford designs a new unique hood for the application.
2 Go Snake is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 10:47 AM
  #54  
Mach 1 Member
 
Dave07997S's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil_Capri
Holy mother of G-d!!
Dave07997S is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 10:50 AM
  #55  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Until we hear anything more, there really isn't any more to be said about the subject.
Bookmark it and move on.
Boomer is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 11:00 AM
  #56  
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
AlsCobra's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 9, 2011
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 16,852
Received 34 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Falc'man
Some food for thought. Australia's "Miami" V8 found in the FPVs is rated at 335kW (450hp) but everyone knows that's heavily under rated. That figure is what it does at the wheels and our dynos here in Aus account for more driveline loss than what you're used to in the US. With the advent of the latest VF Commodore HSV released it's GTS with GM's LSA. That was rated at 430kW (or 575hp). But on the same dyno it got flogged by the Coyote-based 5.0 Miami both in stock and tuned form (see below). They both have the same size blowers, but Ford's V8 is way in front on efficiency. If LSA is a true 575hp then what does that make the meek Miami? The point is the Coyote can punch even harder with a larger blower - or.... a couple of snails - to match or better Trinity. With Ecoboost technology it would mean Ford's "world's most powerful production V8" title would be under no threat. *Note: it says it's gear 5 used in the HSV but that's a typo. The speed confirms it's 4th.
True. ^^^
The forged Boss 5.0L has already been proven to hold a lot of hp. I wouldn't doubt if SVT straps better heads and a blower on the Boss motor and calls it a day. That being said, the 13 GT500 will be a very desirable car to hold on to.
AlsCobra is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 11:33 AM
  #57  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
mustang_lurkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Powertrain: We expect the Shelby GT500 will again utilize the 5.8-liter Trinity V-8, and while a power bump is possible, it’s not at all necessary. The GT500 today struggles to lay down the power and is plenty quick—with the next-gen Mustang’s expected weight reduction, more power would seem superfluous. Once again, the GT500 should get just a single transmission option: a six-speed manual.

Reference: Car and Driver Retrieved from: http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...py-photos-news
mustang_lurkers is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 11:39 AM
  #58  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
mustang_lurkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
To be fair Road and Track belives in your theory that the "Trinity" is dead. So there is a Car and Driver theory and a Road and Track Theory.

And this is it: the Shelby GT350, which will likely bow as a 2016 model. As we've already reported, the next snake will abandon the current GT500's lunatic-fringe 662-hp supercharged engine. It's bittersweet, because I just drove a GT500 last week, and it is a borderline religious expperience, even if it wants to break traction ALL THE TIME.
Retrieved from:
http://www.roadandtrack.com/go/futur...t350-spy-shots
mustang_lurkers is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 11:39 AM
  #59  
GTR Member
 
Overboost's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mustang_lurkers
Powertrain: We expect the Shelby GT500 will again utilize the 5.8-liter Trinity V-8, and while a power bump is possible, it’s not at all necessary. The GT500 today struggles to lay down the power and is plenty quick—with the next-gen Mustang’s expected weight reduction, more power would seem superfluous. Once again, the GT500 should get just a single transmission option: a six-speed manual.

Reference: Car and Driver Retrieved from: http://www.caranddriver.com/news/201...py-photos-news
Unsubstantiated rumors. As you may have read, there's no indication anyone knows what the engineers are up to in Dearborn. Remember when the 2015 was going to be 15" shorter? Yeah....didn't happen.
Overboost is offline  
Old 12/11/13, 11:57 AM
  #60  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
mustang_lurkers's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 5, 2006
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Interview with Ford Engineers. Leans away from the idea of a flat plane crank engine.

The flat-plane-crank V8 rumored for an upcoming Shelby model was not mentioned.



Retrieved from: http://www.roadandtrack.com/go/first...-mustang-debut
mustang_lurkers is offline  


Quick Reply: Trinity Engine Is Not Dead Yet!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 PM.