2015 Mustang Press Release
12/19/13, 06:26 AM
#122
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: January 14, 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
73s were larger but not by much.
These are GT specs
2013/ford web sight
107.1" WB
188.5" Long
73.9" Wide
3618 Lbs
1973 / http://www.mustangspecs.com/years/73.shtml
109" WB
193.8" Long
74.1" Wide
3560 Lbs
These are GT specs
2013/ford web sight
107.1" WB
188.5" Long
73.9" Wide
3618 Lbs
1973 / http://www.mustangspecs.com/years/73.shtml
109" WB
193.8" Long
74.1" Wide
3560 Lbs
Last edited by Brewman; 12/19/13 at 06:29 AM.
12/20/13, 12:47 PM
#123
THE RED FLASH ------ Master-Moderator
You're exactly 100% spot on Thom 
1/20/14, 03:55 PM
#124
Bullitt Member
Join Date: January 17, 2014
Location: Fort Lauderdale , FL
Posts: 221
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
http://www.autoevolution.com/news/20...deo-75050.html
First Glimpse of the 2.3-liter EcoBoost Engine
First Glimpse of the 2.3-liter EcoBoost Engine
1/21/14, 08:20 AM
#125
I Have No Life
Physically yes.
The slide at the reveal showed the engine and cover already.
I'm sure it'll look better in final form and the body is colour matched etc.
I remember seeing the 2005 like this.
You don't have to spam the same link in multiple threads either.
The slide at the reveal showed the engine and cover already.
I'm sure it'll look better in final form and the body is colour matched etc.
I remember seeing the 2005 like this.
You don't have to spam the same link in multiple threads either.
Last edited by Boomer; 1/21/14 at 08:23 AM.
1/26/14, 09:35 PM
#127
Banned
Join Date: July 4, 2012
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 2,983
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
1/27/14, 11:15 AM
#128
Cobra R Member
[
Some People will B¡tch About Anything... So one small element Completely Ruins the Entire Car... SMH
I guess that goes for All Classic Mustangs as Well since Their Backup Lights were All Mounted Below the Bumpers...
It wasn't until 1971 that Ford integrated the Backup Lights into the Tail Lamps.
Some People will B¡tch About Anything... So one small element Completely Ruins the Entire Car... SMH
I guess that goes for All Classic Mustangs as Well since Their Backup Lights were All Mounted Below the Bumpers...
It wasn't until 1971 that Ford integrated the Backup Lights into the Tail Lamps.
Last edited by TampaBear67; 1/28/14 at 06:23 PM.
1/28/14, 10:04 AM
#131
Cobra R Member
1/28/14, 12:46 PM
#133
THE RED FLASH ------ Master-Moderator
1/28/14, 07:37 PM
#134
Bullitt Member
Join Date: August 3, 2012
Location: Cali
Posts: 384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[
Some People will B¡tch About Anything... So one small element Completely Ruins the Entire Car... SMH
I guess that goes for All Classic Mustangs as Well since Their Backup Lights were All Mounted Below the Bumpers...
It wasn't until 1971 that Ford integrated the Backup Lights into the Tail Lamps.
Some People will B¡tch About Anything... So one small element Completely Ruins the Entire Car... SMH
I guess that goes for All Classic Mustangs as Well since Their Backup Lights were All Mounted Below the Bumpers...
It wasn't until 1971 that Ford integrated the Backup Lights into the Tail Lamps.
2/6/14, 10:30 AM
#135
Mach 1 Member
things evolve....i think it looks sleek and purposfully placed where it is...
it would take away from the affect in the actual taillights if it were placed with them.
i just hope i can afford one when they come out cause im really looking forward to owning a CO one. i think the rear is the best looking part of the car...i first saw it and totally reminded me of the old 67-68 fastbacks.
it would take away from the affect in the actual taillights if it were placed with them.
i just hope i can afford one when they come out cause im really looking forward to owning a CO one. i think the rear is the best looking part of the car...i first saw it and totally reminded me of the old 67-68 fastbacks.
2/28/14, 02:54 PM
#137
Member
Join Date: May 6, 2013
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Absolutely!! It's lost all that butch vibe. Looks way too mainstream to me. The back I think I could probably get used to, but the front is just awful. I am glad I got myself a 2014 GT/CS before it's too late!!
3/4/14, 10:49 AM
#138
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: January 14, 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 581
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Unreal, It would seem that most in these threads wanted:
Something totally new.
But it had to MUSTANG.
Had to be completely different BUT had to have Mustang DNA.
The 2015 Is all that. It call back to the 67 and 68 with a Fast back the carries to the tail of the car. the 65 and 66 fastback stopped short like 2005 through 2014.
If you look at the 65 - 68 Fast backs they really are very simple cars. they are clean, sleek and not "BUTCH" at all. they are however SEXY and beautiful.
the thing about the Mustang is it stood out even though it really was a clean simple car at its core.
The mustangs sales have been up against the Camaro and Challenger for more than a few years now and the only way to change that is to move forward. Ford could easily make a modern Mustang that looked like a 65,69,70 Whatever but the bottom line is it would only sell to a hand full of people for a short time.
I love the new car. And I think, it will carry the flame for the next generation.
Just my thoughts.
Something totally new.
But it had to MUSTANG.
Had to be completely different BUT had to have Mustang DNA.
The 2015 Is all that. It call back to the 67 and 68 with a Fast back the carries to the tail of the car. the 65 and 66 fastback stopped short like 2005 through 2014.
If you look at the 65 - 68 Fast backs they really are very simple cars. they are clean, sleek and not "BUTCH" at all. they are however SEXY and beautiful.
the thing about the Mustang is it stood out even though it really was a clean simple car at its core.
The mustangs sales have been up against the Camaro and Challenger for more than a few years now and the only way to change that is to move forward. Ford could easily make a modern Mustang that looked like a 65,69,70 Whatever but the bottom line is it would only sell to a hand full of people for a short time.
I love the new car. And I think, it will carry the flame for the next generation.
Just my thoughts.
Last edited by Brewman; 3/4/14 at 10:51 AM.
3/4/14, 05:06 PM
#140
FR500 Member
Join Date: December 9, 2011
Location: Corpus Christi, TX
Posts: 3,513
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
I already have a test drive lined up at my local dealership with the first gt model they get. Im super excited because theyre going to put an order as soon as the order list shows up. My contact at the dealership even said hed call me in when theyre selecting the options.
Im super excited
Im super excited