2015 Mustang mule testing IRS spotted
And knowing how car companies operate, the first time you have to do anything more than a rear toe adjustment is going to even more expensve as they have to add adjustable components to the suspension.
It is what it is though and the Mustang needs to evolve to meet the tastes of the public - A positve aspect to the IRS in my mind at least is that it allows more interior room and will allow Ford to shrink the size of the Mustang a bit for all the fans who want an S2000 stuffed with a V8.
Also on the bright side, We wont have to worry about debilitating back injuries on long trips crippling Mustang guys and Camaro guys hitting mid-corner bumps in the rain at normal driving speeds and wrecking thier Mustangs
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...-thread-6.html
Strange talk of chrome on the 2015 too...
This guy knew in February...
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...-thread-6.html
Strange talk of chrome on the 2015 too...
http://www.allfordmustangs.com/forum...-thread-6.html
Strange talk of chrome on the 2015 too...
I'd prefer an SRA over an IRS in the Mustang simply because its less maintence (hey ask when was the last timeI've ever had to get an alignment? The answer is never - not in the 18 or so years I've been buying Mustangs) - the improvement in ride and handling just doesn't seem like enough justification for having to continually monitor the rear suspension in fear that I'll end up with a bad alignment and have to replace tires in short order or having to go and find a competent alignment specialist with top notch equipment every six months or so (because thats cheaper than having to spend oh say 700-1000 bucks on rear tires once or twice a year).
And knowing how car companies operate, the first time you have to do anything more than a rear toe adjustment is going to even more expensve as they have to add adjustable components to the suspension.
It is what it is though and the Mustang needs to evolve to meet the tastes of the public - A positve aspect to the IRS in my mind at least is that it allows more interior room and will allow Ford to shrink the size of the Mustang a bit for all the fans who want an S2000 stuffed with a V8.
Also on the bright side, We wont have to worry about debilitating back injuries on long trips crippling Mustang guys and Camaro guys hitting mid-corner bumps in the rain at normal driving speeds and wrecking thier Mustangs
And knowing how car companies operate, the first time you have to do anything more than a rear toe adjustment is going to even more expensve as they have to add adjustable components to the suspension.
It is what it is though and the Mustang needs to evolve to meet the tastes of the public - A positve aspect to the IRS in my mind at least is that it allows more interior room and will allow Ford to shrink the size of the Mustang a bit for all the fans who want an S2000 stuffed with a V8.
Also on the bright side, We wont have to worry about debilitating back injuries on long trips crippling Mustang guys and Camaro guys hitting mid-corner bumps in the rain at normal driving speeds and wrecking thier Mustangs

Honestly, IRS's are anything but delicate cutting edge technology these days -- well, to the rest of the world at least -- and Ford will undoubtedly design a strong, reliable and effective one for the Stang, especially knowing the SRA mavens will take after Ford engineers with their stone axes should the IRS even hint at any strength/reliability issues.





