Notices
'10-14 V6 Modifications Place to discuss 2010 V6 modifications

V6 Tune Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 9/6/14, 07:17 PM
  #81  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by KushBandit

It's a pony car :P
My wifes 2005 Mazda MPV mini van can and has obtained higher speeds than the PONY car 112 limiter.
Old 9/6/14, 07:29 PM
  #82  
Bullitt Member
 
KushBandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 21, 2014
Location: IE, SoCal
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 2011 Kona Blue

My wifes 2005 Mazda MPV mini van can and has obtained higher speeds than the PONY car 112 limiter.
I can imagine.

My buddy had a new Mazda 5 rental a few weeks ago and it topped out at about 120mph. Ford should have just put the same driveshaft as the GT and maybe limited the V6 to something like 130-140mph. That would have made more sense. The V6 obviously has the power to reach it. It's not like the GT driveshaft is anything special, and I don't think it would have impacted the mileage much, if any.

I just wanted to yank his chain because of the whole "muscle/pony" debate
Old 9/6/14, 07:39 PM
  #83  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by KushBandit

I can imagine.

My buddy had a new Mazda 5 rental a few weeks ago and it topped out at about 120mph. Ford should have just put the same driveshaft as the GT and maybe limited the V6 to something like 130-140mph. That would have made more sense. The V6 obviously has the power to reach it. It's not like the GT driveshaft is anything special, and I don't think it would have impacted the mileage much, if any.

I just wanted to yank his chain because of the whole "muscle/pony" debate
I know you did bro. .,yank away. I laughed. I totally agree about the speed limiter should be raised by ford and a better driveshaft given.
Old 9/6/14, 10:46 PM
  #84  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by KushBandit
I can imagine. My buddy had a new Mazda 5 rental a few weeks ago and it topped out at about 120mph. Ford should have just put the same driveshaft as the GT and maybe limited the V6 to something like 130-140mph. That would have made more sense. The V6 obviously has the power to reach it. It's not like the GT driveshaft is anything special, and I don't think it would have impacted the mileage much, if any. I just wanted to yank his chain because of the whole "muscle/pony" debate
Actually in the 2015, I expect the EB cars to be limited to 130, GT to 155. That's how it usually is with base/high-po cars in Europe...
Old 9/10/14, 06:31 PM
  #85  
Banned
 
White2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 25, 2010
Posts: 330
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by KushBandit
I can imagine.

My buddy had a new Mazda 5 rental a few weeks ago and it topped out at about 120mph. Ford should have just put the same driveshaft as the GT and maybe limited the V6 to something like 130-140mph. That would have made more sense. The V6 obviously has the power to reach it. It's not like the GT driveshaft is anything special, and I don't think it would have impacted the mileage much, if any.

I just wanted to yank his chain because of the whole "muscle/pony" debate
The drive shaft in the V6 is how you get that good highway mpg. Putting the GT drive shaft in the car would drop your mpg. I don't know by how much but I'm guessing 3 to 5 mpg anyway. Not that I disagree with your idea, but just explaining why Ford went with the different drive shaft. It was all about touting the better mpg.
Old 4/30/15, 08:55 AM
  #86  
Cobra Member
 
JoeMidnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 21, 2014
Location: Canada, Ontario
Posts: 1,099
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
I'm going to revive this thread ( thanks to Patrick for reminding me about it!)


Hey Joey, did you ever end up getting that Steeda tune? or any tune? I'd be interested in getting your feedback based on your experience.
Old 4/30/15, 09:52 AM
  #87  
Cobra Member
 
tukatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 4, 2013
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 1,324
Received 44 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by White2010
The drive shaft in the V6 is how you get that good highway mpg. Putting the GT drive shaft in the car would drop your mpg. I don't know by how much but I'm guessing 3 to 5 mpg anyway. Not that I disagree with your idea, but just explaining why Ford went with the different drive shaft. It was all about touting the better mpg.
Could you explain how the drive shaft affects MPG. It doesn't change the gearing so I don't understand how it could make a difference. I do agree I wish they had put in the GT shaft and not limited top end.
Old 4/30/15, 12:07 PM
  #88  
Cobra Member
 
JoeMidnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 21, 2014
Location: Canada, Ontario
Posts: 1,099
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Originally Posted by tukatz
Could you explain how the drive shaft affects MPG. It doesn't change the gearing so I don't understand how it could make a difference. I do agree I wish they had put in the GT shaft and not limited top end.




Not unless he gets unbanned
Old 4/30/15, 12:43 PM
  #89  
Super Boss Lawman Member
 
SpectreH's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 5, 2015
Location: Yukon, OK
Posts: 4,322
Received 1,155 Likes on 843 Posts
The only way I could see the drive shaft impacting economy would be a heavier unit causing a drop because of the greater rotating mass.
Old 4/30/15, 02:43 PM
  #90  
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
 
Joeywhat's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 6, 2014
Location: Motor City
Posts: 1,575
Received 41 Likes on 38 Posts
Originally Posted by JoeMidnight
I'm going to revive this thread ( thanks to Patrick for reminding me about it!)


Hey Joey, did you ever end up getting that Steeda tune? or any tune? I'd be interested in getting your feedback based on your experience.
I have both a Steeda and Redliners tune. I usually use the Redliners as I like the throttle response better then the Steeda tune. I have both a race and performance tune from Redliners, the perf tune was very much like Steeda, the race tune offered significantly better throttle response.

Either way, all three tunes are good.
Old 7/9/15, 06:27 AM
  #91  
V6 Member
 
gmwta77's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 9, 2015
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MPT tunes get a lot of hype
Old 7/10/15, 09:34 AM
  #92  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TMSBOSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 31, 2011
Location: USA
Posts: 141
Received 19 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by KushBandit
I can imagine.

My buddy had a new Mazda 5 rental a few weeks ago and it topped out at about 120mph. Ford should have just put the same driveshaft as the GT and maybe limited the V6 to something like 130-140mph. That would have made more sense. The V6 obviously has the power to reach it. It's not like the GT driveshaft is anything special, and I don't think it would have impacted the mileage much, if any.

I just wanted to yank his chain because of the whole "muscle/pony" debate
A shaft Like the two piece in the GT would likely work. The GT shaft is a different length. Trans sits a bit more forward in a V-6. If I remember correctly, about 30MM.
Old 7/10/15, 09:10 PM
  #93  
GT Member
 
whowasthat's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 12, 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
for warranty purposes why not keep the stock ECU and replace it with a flashed one?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
samjluck
5.0L GT Modifications
7
9/17/15 10:24 PM
Kestral
General Mustang Chat
2
9/2/15 06:52 PM



Quick Reply: V6 Tune Questions



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.