5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

How about a 351CI Coyote?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2010 | 11:14 PM
  #1  
FivePointO's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: April 2, 2010
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
How about a 351CI Coyote?

Check this out:
http://www.stangtv.com/news/pri-2010...d-short-block/


Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011 | 03:04 PM
  #2  
FastRedPonyCar's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 19, 2011
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From: Montgomery, AL


Wonder what the price tag on that puppy's gonna be?
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2011 | 03:50 PM
  #3  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 08:34 AM
  #4  
Digital_Synapse's Avatar
 
Joined: April 11, 2007
Posts: 832
Likes: 2
From: Deep in the heart of TEXAS
"like" lol
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2011 | 04:31 PM
  #5  
70MACH1OWNER's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 9, 2005
Posts: 6,982
Likes: 6
From: New Carlisle, Ohio (20 miles north of Dayton)
Reply
Old Feb 3, 2011 | 12:51 PM
  #6  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
No replacement for displacement. A 5.8 Coyote, now were talking!!!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 01:33 AM
  #7  
Ducky's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 20, 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Malmstrom AFB


Although I had heard there was no room left to stroke or bore the motor out. I wonder if that is a new block. Then again I heard the motor would never handle boost, and here we are.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 01:43 AM
  #8  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuude....

Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 08:29 AM
  #9  
RandyW's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: October 23, 2009
Posts: 1,312
Likes: 2
From: NW Minnesota
Originally Posted by Ducky
Although I had heard there was no room left to stroke or bore the motor out. I wonder if that is a new block. Then again I heard the motor would never handle boost, and here we are.
I remember reading that it would be very difficult to increase the bore. I don't recall reading that the stroke couldn't be increased.
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 03:57 PM
  #10  
eric n's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 27, 2004
Posts: 1,292
Likes: 2
From: Bakersfield, CA
Holy bloody sodding hell!!!!!
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 05:54 PM
  #11  
OAC_Sparky's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: June 11, 2010
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RandyW
I remember reading that it would be very difficult to increase the bore. I don't recall reading that the stroke couldn't be increased.
Well, that IS how you got a 302 to a 351W; an extra inch of deck height ...
Reply
Old Feb 9, 2011 | 11:48 PM
  #12  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Or a helluva "I dont give a **** if the wrist pin is making love to the second compression ring" stroker.

I guess there still are some stroker kits for a standard bore pushrod 302 that nip on 351 CID for you know, when 347 CID is not enough

I could dig a tall deck coyote, it is Ford's prefered method of adding displacement and what a cool why to make a next gen GT500

Crazy I know, why would Ford just make a special engine just for the the top dog Mustang
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2011 | 12:25 AM
  #13  
OAC_Sparky's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: June 11, 2010
Posts: 894
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by bob
Or a helluva "I dont give a **** if the wrist pin is making love to the second compression ring" stroker.

I guess there still are some stroker kits for a standard bore pushrod 302 that nip on 351 CID for you know, when 347 CID is not enough
Well, I used to work major repair in the plant making 351W in the late 80s; and without the deck height you would have to stroke out nearly 1/2" on the crank (ie a 351 crank) and even by shifting the wrist pin you're coming dangerously close to the piston skirts emerging from the bottom of the cylinder bore. Remember what you don't stroke up (because of a limited deck height), you stroke down. It would never take the kind of revs that the Coyote thrives on, the piston head distortion would be horrendous.
Reply
Old Feb 10, 2011 | 01:21 AM
  #14  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
boy if they made a tall deck version of the coyote block....oh my. not a 5.4's 1.1 inch higher deck, just .5 inches.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 03:21 PM
  #15  
Ducky's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: July 20, 2010
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
From: Malmstrom AFB
Originally Posted by RandyW
I remember reading that it would be very difficult to increase the bore. I don't recall reading that the stroke couldn't be increased.
I'm no Ford engineer of course. But I was under the impression that the 5.0 is basically a stroked 4.6 with awesome heads. One of Ford's stipulations to the engineers when they began designing this block was that it has to be made on the same machines as the 4.6. That is why the mounts and bellhousing pattern are the same. And along that line of thinking, I read there was no room left to stroke the engine further. And that in fact, the cylinder sleeves were already extended to handle the stock stroke. It's also completely possible that I am entirely incorrect, so take this post with a grain of salt.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 03:24 PM
  #16  
Scott2's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 1, 2010
Posts: 841
Likes: 16
From: King City, Ontario, Canada
Very nice, I like!
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 04:07 PM
  #17  
Hawaii 5.0's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: December 25, 2010
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Cant....stop.....drooling! Oh the possibilities!
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2011 | 11:23 PM
  #18  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by Ducky
I'm no Ford engineer of course. But I was under the impression that the 5.0 is basically a stroked 4.6 with awesome heads. One of Ford's stipulations to the engineers when they began designing this block was that it has to be made on the same machines as the 4.6. That is why the mounts and bellhousing pattern are the same. And along that line of thinking, I read there was no room left to stroke the engine further. And that in fact, the cylinder sleeves were already extended to handle the stock stroke. It's also completely possible that I am entirely incorrect, so take this post with a grain of salt.
The bore spacing and deck height are the same between the 4.6 and 5.0 but the coyote adds a little bit of stroke and a little bit of bore to get there.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coyote5-0
5.0L GT Modifications
23
Oct 12, 2015 10:44 AM
FromZto5
General Vehicle Discussion/News
75
Oct 5, 2015 02:27 PM
MRGTX
2010-2014 Mustang
19
Sep 8, 2015 03:19 AM
JTB
Motorsports
0
Sep 7, 2015 10:20 PM
BavarianStang
Ford Discussions
0
Sep 5, 2015 05:55 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:18 PM.