5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

Evolution Performance, Inc. - 2011 Mustang GT 5.0L 4V Exhaust Tech Info!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 4/30/10, 02:48 PM
  #41  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sax1031
I wish we could get the numbers after the tuning and what not they did.
yea I am sure he will post them..they update facebook quite often with all of this information.
Old 4/30/10, 02:49 PM
  #42  
Mach 1 Member
 
Lancel's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 22, 2010
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I wish we had gotten more numbers of it in stock form, but oh well.
Old 4/30/10, 03:05 PM
  #43  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lancel
I wish we had gotten more numbers of it in stock form, but oh well.
The stock #s are good, what were you expecting?
Old 4/30/10, 03:08 PM
  #44  
V6 Member
 
Sax1031's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 28, 2010
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eci
The stock #s are good, what were you expecting?
I think he was saying he wished they would have run it a few more times stock to see what they could get before they started modding.
Old 4/30/10, 03:10 PM
  #45  
Mach 1 Member
 
Lancel's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 22, 2010
Posts: 903
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yeah, more meant the quarter mile runs.
Old 4/30/10, 03:11 PM
  #46  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sax1031
I think he was saying he wished they would have run it a few more times stock to see what they could get before they started modding.
Wouldn't make business sense. Evo would rather have a slow stock time, mod the car with a pacakge, THEN get the best time possible.

Evo also claims 60rwhp on a 2010 GT500 with a tune ONLY, while others like VMP got 13 and state the need for a pulley minimum to get large gains.

Figure that one out.

Plan your mods and the vendors you use carefully. Listen to actual owners on boards, not just those with interest like a tuner/vendor.

Last edited by eci; 4/30/10 at 03:15 PM.
Old 4/30/10, 03:29 PM
  #47  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here is the stock dyno video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaZ3bJOKOwI
Old 4/30/10, 04:06 PM
  #48  
Mach 1 Member
 
hawkeye18's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 20, 2010
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by eci
Kona sucks. Would never buy.
No, it's "I think kona sucks."

There is a big difference between presenting an opinion, and presenting a supposition as fact. One is an opinion, the other makes you look sort of like an ***.

Kona does not objectively "suck" any more than any of the colors the Mustang is offered. If you ask 1,000 people about color choices, you would have 1,000 colors that suck. Personally, I think silver and white are the dumbest colors ever for any vehicle, but that's just my opinion. I didn't say "White sucks. Would never buy."

Just sayin'. You have a very negative attitude. I am new here but that is what is standing out the most to me.
Old 4/30/10, 04:09 PM
  #49  
V6 Member
 
jjS89LX's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 21, 2010
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hawkeye18
No, it's "I think kona sucks."

There is a big difference between presenting an opinion, and presenting a supposition as fact. One is an opinion, the other makes you look sort of like an ***.

Kona does not objectively "suck" any more than any of the colors the Mustang is offered. If you ask 1,000 people about color choices, you would have 1,000 colors that suck. Personally, I think silver and white are the dumbest colors ever for any vehicle, but that's just my opinion. I didn't say "White sucks. Would never buy."

Just sayin'. You have a very negative attitude. I am new here but that is what is standing out the most to me.
According to his sig he owns a 2010 gt500 in kona with white stripes. I think he was being sarcastic.
Old 4/30/10, 04:35 PM
  #50  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by hawkeye18
No, it's "I think kona sucks."

There is a big difference between presenting an opinion, and presenting a supposition as fact. One is an opinion, the other makes you look sort of like an ***.

Kona does not objectively "suck" any more than any of the colors the Mustang is offered. If you ask 1,000 people about color choices, you would have 1,000 colors that suck. Personally, I think silver and white are the dumbest colors ever for any vehicle, but that's just my opinion. I didn't say "White sucks. Would never buy."

Just sayin'. You have a very negative attitude. I am new here but that is what is standing out the most to me.
I have a 2010 Kona Blue GT500, as stated in my sig. It was a joke. Get a grip.
Old 4/30/10, 04:36 PM
  #51  
Team Mustang Source
 
montreal ponies's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
368 RWHP and 352 lb/ft, with a drivetrain loss of 15%, that equals to roughly 423 FWHP. Not that bad for a bone stock car. Thanks for the link Fred.
Old 4/30/10, 05:00 PM
  #52  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by montreal ponies
368 RWHP and 352 lb/ft, with a drivetrain loss of 15%, that equals to roughly 423 FWHP. Not that bad for a bone stock car. Thanks for the link Fred.
Careful you will be accused of ricer math throwing that out there just like I was.
Old 4/30/10, 05:04 PM
  #53  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by montreal ponies
368 RWHP and 352 lb/ft, with a drivetrain loss of 15%, that equals to roughly 423 FWHP. Not that bad for a bone stock car. Thanks for the link Fred.
Doesn't work that way. When people quote the "15%" number they are assuming a Dynojet which Evolution doesn't use, as well as assuming specific configuration of said Dynojet.
Old 4/30/10, 05:08 PM
  #54  
Cobra R Member
 
Kahdir's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 3, 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 1,569
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by todd03blown
here is the stock dyno video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MaZ3bJOKOwI
Anyone else notice their 2011 GT500 next to it...
Old 4/30/10, 05:27 PM
  #55  
GT Member
 
tbi0904's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 10, 2010
Location: huntley, il
Posts: 146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by todd03blown
Just saw Fred update on facebook they are heading to the track again with their '11 GT!!
Wonder if they're headed back down to Cecil County. It's Friday, street and grudge racing night!
Old 4/30/10, 05:29 PM
  #56  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tbi0904
Wonder if they're headed back down to Cecil County. It's Friday, street and grudge racing night!
Yep he said they were
Old 4/30/10, 05:31 PM
  #57  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kahdir
Anyone else notice their 2011 GT500 next to it...
yep looks like it has the SVT Performance package as well.
Old 4/30/10, 05:56 PM
  #58  
Bullitt Member
 
RickyD's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 3, 2004
Location: QC, Canada
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by todd03blown
yep looks like it has the SVT Performance package as well.
I don't think so... the SVT pkg has solid side stripes...
Old 4/30/10, 06:28 PM
  #59  
Team Mustang Source
 
montreal ponies's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by eci
Doesn't work that way. When people quote the "15%" number they are assuming a Dynojet which Evolution doesn't use, as well as assuming specific configuration of said Dynojet.
Give or take 2%, so WTF, it's in Ford's ballpark numbers and even a bit better. So it's in no way overrated, which is good news. We got the car we wanted in stock form. Way 'da go Ford.
Old 4/30/10, 10:54 PM
  #60  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
Originally Posted by todd03blown
yep looks like it has the SVT Performance package as well.
I think it's a customer car. He said their 11 GT500 is going to be Race Red/Matte Black stripes...


Quick Reply: Evolution Performance, Inc. - 2011 Mustang GT 5.0L 4V Exhaust Tech Info!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:58 AM.