5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Dyno gains

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 06:55 AM
  #1  
way2qk4u2c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2010
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Dyno gains

Alright had the 5.0 dyno'd on saturday. Did 1 pull for baseline and it came out to 365 hp. Then i slapped on a CAI, Bama tune 93 race and i already had roush axlebacks on the car. We did 3 more pulls and we got 380 hp out of it. Should i be happy with that or is that low for the mods i put on. It seems like bama website says 24-30 rwhp from cai and tune so im wondering where my extra 10 hp went to.

Ill post the dyno sheet tomorrow but it does look like the fuel is rich.

The car was a blast driving back home- between the sound of roush and the power difference it was heaven.

Also after you load a tune is there some magic that you have to do for all the sensors to recalibrate before you run another dyno pull? Is it possible that i didnt have any drive cycles on it to really get a good reading?
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 08:37 AM
  #2  
Ivan 5.0's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 21, 2010
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: NoVA
My car did 391/382 with Bama's 93 Race tune and a C&L CAI and 3.55 gears. Running the Livernois 93 Tune + C&L CAI + SW Catback (and 3.55 gears) it put down 394/386. Below is the graph of the Bama + C&L. Keep in mind all dyno numbers are going to vary - location, temps, humidity, the dyno itself, ect.


Last edited by Ivan 5.0; Jun 27, 2011 at 08:48 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 08:59 AM
  #3  
way2qk4u2c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2010
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
i would love to get 391 lol. bama is looking into my tune to see what they can do. I still think its a little low. i would think 20 hp would be on the low side.
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 09:17 AM
  #4  
Ethanjbeau's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 12, 2010
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: MA (north shore)
Put a full exhaust on it and then you'll get some great numbers
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 09:55 AM
  #5  
way2qk4u2c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2010
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
here's a video if anyone wants to hear roush exhaust WOT.
http://vimeo.com/25610657
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 10:01 AM
  #6  
Ethanjbeau's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: February 12, 2010
Posts: 1,411
Likes: 0
From: MA (north shore)
Sounds great!
Reply
Old Jun 27, 2011 | 10:22 AM
  #7  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by way2qk4u2c
Alright had the 5.0 dyno'd on saturday. Did 1 pull for baseline and it came out to 365 hp. Then i slapped on a CAI, Bama tune 93 race and i already had roush axlebacks on the car. We did 3 more pulls and we got 380 hp out of it. Should i be happy with that or is that low for the mods i put on. It seems like bama website says 24-30 rwhp from cai and tune so im wondering where my extra 10 hp went to.

Ill post the dyno sheet tomorrow but it does look like the fuel is rich.

The car was a blast driving back home- between the sound of roush and the power difference it was heaven.

Also after you load a tune is there some magic that you have to do for all the sensors to recalibrate before you run another dyno pull? Is it possible that i didnt have any drive cycles on it to really get a good reading?
i never did a tune/cai dyno pull, but tune / offroad xpipe = 398rwhp.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2011 | 04:48 AM
  #8  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
That gain is pretty low. Them #'s look like a tune alone increase. Most tuners are running the car a little rich because they are finding out there is no more power to be made by leaning it out so why push it. If they can not straighten it out talk to Justin at VMP and he can set you up with a great tune.
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2011 | 06:44 AM
  #9  
way2qk4u2c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2010
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
thanks red candy- i will do that.

crap i forgot my dyno sheet at home again- will try to post it tomorrow
Reply
Old Jul 4, 2011 | 06:48 PM
  #10  
zilla8's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2010
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles,CA
I think you can get in the 400rwhp range with full exhaust and a little modification to the tune.

I still dont understand all of the bone stock freak cars that put down 390 + in stock trim.It seems your stock numbers are more inline to what a lot of others made.

I know there are generous dyno's and other factors but you should not see that big of a difference in cars regardless of octane or 6sp/AT

These cars respond well to exhaust mods and with highflow cats and Xpipe along with CAI and Blowby racing tune my car made 406rwhp/387rwtq

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV-GwEvu1xQ
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2011 | 03:28 PM
  #11  
dan_h's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: April 18, 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Well, you guys are definitely getting better dyno numbers than me....370HP with a CAI and 93 octane 'Race' Tune...it was 105 degrees in the dyno area so possibly this robbed me of some HP.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2011 | 04:26 AM
  #12  
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: June 9, 2008
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 1
From: Rochester NY
The Bama tunes are showing less power than most other tunes it seems. Try another tune and see what happens.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2011 | 08:03 AM
  #13  
way2qk4u2c's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: October 5, 2010
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Yeah id like to try a jon lund tune or maybe a brenspeed one.

the bama 93 race tune seems very touchy for a daily driver. so i put it on the 87 street one and that one seems more smooth. i keep reading everyone elses reviews about tunes and havent decided exactly which one to go with.

Where is justin out of and what does he charge for a tune?

Is it worth getting a custom tune on a dyno or is email tunes fine?

Last edited by way2qk4u2c; Jul 13, 2011 at 08:05 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2011 | 12:52 PM
  #14  
kws6000's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: April 6, 2010
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by zilla8
I think you can get in the 400rwhp range with full
I still dont understand all of the bone stock freak cars that put down 390 + in stock trim.It seems your stock numbers are more inline to what a lot of others made.

I know there are generous dyno's and other factors but you should not see that big of a difference in cars regardless of octane or 6sp/AT


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV-GwEvu1xQ
Wanna bet....some feel good dynos out there.....
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2011 | 02:53 PM
  #15  
dan_h's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: April 18, 2011
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by RedCandy5.0
The Bama tunes are showing less power than most other tunes it seems. Try another tune and see what happens.

I'm all over that as we speak...I just spoke with a guy at Steeda and they're sending me one of their tunes (I bought a Steeda intake with my tune from another source (NOT Bama BTW) so i thought i'd go straight to Steeda with the issue)...according to him, i should have seem better HP #s even in the high temperature environment.

He did ask me if my dyno guy (who has the dynojet dyno) had it 'loaded'...i didnt know to ask, so i didnt know. Apparently this impacts HP numbers.

BTW i called Steeda today at 3:30PM CT and just received my email tune at 3:50PM CT Today....fortunately for me they'd just processed a request for someone with the same processor code. How's that for good luck and good service!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Road_Runner
5.0L GT Modifications
67
Sep 2, 2024 04:46 PM
Bryanh24
5.0L GT Modifications
14
Oct 14, 2015 08:43 AM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
GLOCKer
General Mustang Chat
2
Sep 28, 2015 05:20 PM
JTB
Motorsports
1
Sep 3, 2015 10:50 AM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 AM.