5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

All the CAI/Tune talk about #8 has left me in a pickle!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8/21/13, 09:26 PM
  #21  
Mach 1 Member
 
slostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 24, 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Right. Brenspeed cooked some motors too and wouldn't stand behind them. Couple of threads here about that.
Bama was the only one I know of that developed a 'warranty'.




The 11's & 12's were the years with the issue. Ford redesigned the pistons for '13. Coatings, different oil control, squirter delete (not needed after redesign).

https://themustangsource.com/f800/confirmed-2013s-have-different-pistons-no-oil-squirters-506361/index4/#post6280407
According to my warranty sheet(service sheet) my bottom end was replaced with a 13, why I don't know. I don't know if that's what the "fix" called for or when it popped 13's started rolling out and sourcing that short block was easier.
Old 8/21/13, 09:38 PM
  #22  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by slostang
According to my warranty sheet(service sheet) my bottom end was replaced with a 13, why I don't know. I don't know if that's what the "fix" called for or when it popped 13's started rolling out and sourcing that short block was easier.
I remember another discussion where a guy was unsure if he got a remanufactured 11/12 or a 13. One guy said they would send an 11/12 to save money. My response was 'why would Ford put out a potential problem that they might have to replace on warranty again?'. It makes more sense to send out a short block with the new pistons.
(New coated with diff ring setup/oil control on R)

Name:  Pic1.jpg
Views: 17
Size:  121.7 KB

Last edited by cdynaco; 8/21/13 at 09:39 PM.
Old 8/22/13, 11:11 PM
  #23  
Bullitt Member
 
Supra's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 19, 2012
Location: Saskatchewan, Canada
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
People are still paranoid about the #8 issue?
Old 8/23/13, 10:35 PM
  #24  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Supra
People are still paranoid about the #8 issue?
Anybody with an 11/12... or considering buying a used 11/12... should be!
Old 8/24/13, 12:14 AM
  #25  
Cobra Member
 
2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I Installed my Steeda 93 tune and their cai at 1000 miles. I now have 20,000 without a hiccup. I beat the crap out ot the car the first 1000 to be certain there were no issues before the tune. I talked to Gus at length about the #8 enigma before my install. In short, the aftermarket tunes are even safer than the factory tune (once the tuners figured all of this out). This conversation with Gus was over 2 years ago but I remember him saying that his tune was a bit rich on #8 to actually aid in cooling along with other jargon that I don't remember. Of course more power can be tweaked leaning the car but they tune for power and safety. I will say the steeda 93 tune and cai turned my car into a beast and is very abrupt in the 6r80 tranny. There are some issues with steeda auto tunes about traction and shifting but this isn't what the thread is about. Steeda has 0 #8 failures in the coyote. I will say that i plan on getting another tune from a reputable tuner that specializes in autos. However, don't take this as a bash on Steeda . They are a manual car oriented company and their tunes are insane; there's just tuners out there now that have in house cars that are autos. Steeda's test cars are manuals. Let me say this, if I owned a manual car, Steeda would be my top pick by far. Tune your car!
Old 8/24/13, 10:55 AM
  #26  
GT Member
 
linelock's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Anybody with an 11/12... or considering buying a used 11/12... should be!
I'm not, and think it is ridiculous to be worried about a problem that affected so few motors. The whole #8 thing was blown way out of proportion.
Old 8/24/13, 10:58 AM
  #27  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
2011 Kona Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 26, 2011
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by linelock

I'm not, and think it is ridiculous to be worried about a problem that affected so few motors. The whole #8 thing was blown way out of proportion.
True that. Agreed!
Old 8/24/13, 11:09 AM
  #28  
Mach 1 Member
 
zeroaviation's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 1, 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 669
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by linelock
The whole #8 thing was blown way out of proportion.
Ditto.
Old 8/24/13, 11:50 AM
  #29  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by linelock
I'm not, and think it is ridiculous to be worried about a problem that affected so few motors. The whole #8 thing was blown way out of proportion.
I understand your feelings. But in retrospect, the 11/12's weren't ready for prime time - neither the transmission or pistons. If it was just a 'few', then why did Ford initiate a redesign for both issues for 13 forward? If you remember, Ford even bragged about how fast they developed the new 5.0. Apparently rushed it a bit too much.

Last edited by cdynaco; 8/24/13 at 11:52 AM.
Old 8/24/13, 03:10 PM
  #30  
Cobra Member
 
2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2011
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,019
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cdynaco

I understand your feelings. But in retrospect, the 11/12's weren't ready for prime time - neither the transmission or pistons. If it was just a 'few', then why did Ford initiate a redesign for both issues for 13 forward? If you remember, Ford even bragged about how fast they developed the new 5.0. Apparently rushed it a bit too much.
that's not the case whatsoever because with that logic the MT82 would be long gone.
Old 8/24/13, 03:13 PM
  #31  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by 2012GT
that's not the case whatsoever because with that logic the MT82 would be long gone.
Why? They didn't discontinue the 5.0, they re-engineered it for 2013. Same with the Getrag. Apparently you missed the part where they had to change internal parts in the MT82.


In terms of changes made since the 2011 production began:

04/26/2010: Revised Clutch Pedal Return Spring
For clutch stay-out at high RPMs

10/19/2010: Revised fastener/thread locker
Addresses clutch fastener back out

09/07/2010: Changed 5th/6th gear surface finish
Addresses grinding during 5th gear shifts

01/07/2011: Revised Clutch Spring Finger Height
For clutch stay-out at high RPMs

02/25/2011: Fourth gear weld incomplete during production
Process verification to ensure complete gear welding

07/01/2011: Vehicle message center
Extended skip-shift illumination time so drivers aware of engagement

07/25/2011: Added phosphate coating to gears
Reduces gear noise

07/25/2011: Lower viscosity lubricant
To reduce shift effort in all temps

08/31/2011: Changed clearance between 2nd gear friction ring & cone
Resolve ring to gear face contact and gear clash

Last edited by cdynaco; 8/24/13 at 03:26 PM.
Old 8/25/13, 03:07 AM
  #32  
Mach 1 Member
 
G Wrecks's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zeroaviation
Thats agreeable. I'm not sure what each specific tuner is doing. But, I am sure they have all veered away from the SCT base tune

Thats why there was soo much issue in the beginning, everyone was loading the base SCT cal, and making small adjustments, then shipping it with timing tables in place.

-Matt
This
Old 8/26/13, 01:08 AM
  #33  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
conv_stang's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 3, 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 2,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Why? They didn't discontinue the 5.0, they re-engineered it for 2013. Same with the Getrag. Apparently you missed the part where they had to change internal parts in the MT82.
Haven't had any issues with my MT82. Notchy when cold is the only issue ive had. Even still using the stock shifter LOL and im at the strip with it atleast once a month.
Old 8/28/13, 06:58 PM
  #34  
Bullitt Member
 
joey8's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 25, 2013
Location: Jersey
Posts: 460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by conv_stang
Haven't had any issues with my MT82. Notchy when cold is the only issue ive had. Even still using the stock shifter LOL and im at the strip with it atleast once a month.
Call me crazy but i actually have gotten use to the stock shifter and bracket. I rarely miss the 2nd to 3rd shift even at redline. I find if you don't over think it make sure the clutch it totally pressed to the floor and just go straight up from 2nd youll hit 3rd 90% of the time. Just my 2 cents.
Old 8/28/13, 07:06 PM
  #35  
Mach 1 Member
 
slostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 24, 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by joey8
Call me crazy but i actually have gotten use to the stock shifter and bracket. I rarely miss the 2nd to 3rd shift even at redline. I find if you don't over think it make sure the clutch it totally pressed to the floor and just go straight up from 2nd youll hit 3rd 90% of the time. Just my 2 cents.
And I hit it 100% of the time.....point?
Old 8/28/13, 07:07 PM
  #36  
Mach 1 Member
 
G Wrecks's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slostang
And I hit it 100% of the time.....point?
I guess you're a douche?
Old 8/28/13, 07:12 PM
  #37  
Mach 1 Member
 
slostang's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 24, 2011
Location: Delaware
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by G Wrecks
I guess you're a douche?
Old 8/28/13, 07:15 PM
  #38  
Mach 1 Member
 
G Wrecks's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 10, 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by slostang
Old 8/28/13, 07:48 PM
  #39  
Cobra R Member
 
Mr. V's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 22, 2012
Location: Ontario, California
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by cdynaco

I understand your feelings. But in retrospect, the 11/12's weren't ready for prime time - neither the transmission or pistons. If it was just a 'few', then why did Ford initiate a redesign for both issues for 13 forward? If you remember, Ford even bragged about how fast they developed the new 5.0. Apparently rushed it a bit too much.
I could be wrong but I remember reading that removing the oil squirters freed up more power and was more cost effective. The positive of the squirters was longer life. When the engines without oil squirters passed fords testing, the squirters were deemed overkill. I don't remember reading anywhere that the #8 failures were due to design errors.
Old 8/29/13, 03:56 PM
  #40  
V6 Member
 
KC Henry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 14, 2013
Location: KC - Kansas City
Posts: 92
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stupidgenius36
You can PM a mod and have them delete this thread. Stop spreading this BS, install it, and move on.
Unless you work in a Ford dealership (I have been working parts in dealerships most of my life), I suggest you do not call it "spreading bs", because it is very real, and not bs.

Most people that have issues from an aftermarket tune with an engine and/or trans (MT82) do not post about it online in hopes that the Ford reps that frequent these websites do not catch wind of it, in hopes that the repairs will "slip through under warranty".


Quick Reply: All the CAI/Tune talk about #8 has left me in a pickle!



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 PM.