Notices
5.0L GT Modifications Placeholder for future motor based GT's modifications.

5.0 Dyno Results: JLT Cold Air, Lethal O/R X, Bassani Axle Back, Lund Ghost Cams Tune

Old 4/7/11, 03:51 PM
  #21  
3rd Times A Charm
Thread Starter
 
S197 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 17, 2005
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here's the dyno sheet in a better scan.
Attached Images  
Old 4/13/11, 12:13 AM
  #22  
Member
 
JV Doose's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 19, 2010
Location: Socal
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
nice what shop is this out of?

im in so cal and have been looking for a good shop around here.
Old 4/13/11, 08:17 AM
  #23  
3rd Times A Charm
Thread Starter
 
S197 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 17, 2005
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by JV Doose
nice what shop is this out of?

im in so cal and have been looking for a good shop around here.
You need to go see Adam at ST Motorsports in San Bernardino. He's the best in the business!
Old 4/13/11, 06:42 PM
  #24  
V6 Member
 
Solid 2452's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 6, 2011
Location: Fort Lee VA
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Today I added the Boss 302 intake manifold and a jLT cold air intake with a custom dyno. I wish my dyno numbers looked like yours. I started with a baseline before mods
Max power 348.97
Max torque 330.21

After mods
Max power 400.31
Max torque 350.26

I don't know much about the dyno and numbers. I am new at this but I am learning.
Attached Images   
Old 4/13/11, 09:28 PM
  #25  
3rd Times A Charm
Thread Starter
 
S197 GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 17, 2005
Posts: 2,460
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Solid 2452
Today I added the Boss 302 intake manifold and a jLT cold air intake with a custom dyno. I wish my dyno numbers looked like yours. I started with a baseline before mods
Max power 348.97
Max torque 330.21

After mods
Max power 400.31
Max torque 350.26

I don't know much about the dyno and numbers. I am new at this but I am learning.
Dyno numbers aren't that important to be honest. Different dynos, different weather conditions, different altitude, different cars, etc...ET's and Trap Speeds are the best indication of how your car performs.

If you are comparing dyno numbers, just compare your own baseline to your own "after".

Peak numbers don't mean as much the torque curve and where you gain the power.

If you are still running cats, I'd get rid of them. Maybe try out the new L&M throttle body. I hear that Meziere is coming out with their electric pump soon too.
Old 4/13/11, 10:20 PM
  #26  
Cobra Member
 
DaSFGiants4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 12, 2010
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,310
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They say the most efficient way to measure performance is the track.
Old 4/14/11, 01:20 AM
  #27  
 
Digital_Synapse's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2007
Location: Deep in the heart of TEXAS
Posts: 832
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DaSFGiants4Life
They say the most efficient way to measure performance is the track.
Assuming great track prep, great tires, and a decent driver.
Old 4/14/11, 11:34 AM
  #28  
V6 Member
 
t-ray's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 26, 2010
Location: bham al
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Digital_Synapse
Assuming great track prep, great tires, and a decent driver.
I disagree with the first two. One should never compare ET's as some way of measuring performance. ET's are almost entirely a function of traction.

Trap speeds on the other hand do reflect changes in power, and are much harder to mess up than ET's. You don't even have to be a decent driver, just a consistent driver.
Old 4/14/11, 06:15 PM
  #29  
 
Digital_Synapse's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2007
Location: Deep in the heart of TEXAS
Posts: 832
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by t-ray
I disagree with the first two. One should never compare ET's as some way of measuring performance. ET's are almost entirely a function of traction.

Trap speeds on the other hand do reflect changes in power, and are much harder to mess up than ET's. You don't even have to be a decent driver, just a consistent driver.
I spun 1-5 down our local track. The wheels never stopped slipping. My buddy on drag radials on the other hand. Hook and go.
Old 4/16/11, 11:44 AM
  #30  
Bullitt Member
 
Bigjohns97's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 3, 2009
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
you spun through 5th? what track?

Also i contact Lund about his tunes and the adaptive octane, price, etc...
Old 4/16/11, 03:20 PM
  #31  
V6 Member
 
blk5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 4, 2010
Posts: 99
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bigjohns97
you spun through 5th? what track?

Also i contact Lund about his tunes and the adaptive octane, price, etc...
What did he say about the adaptive octane?
Old 4/18/11, 12:30 AM
  #32  
 
Digital_Synapse's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 11, 2007
Location: Deep in the heart of TEXAS
Posts: 832
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Bigjohns97
you spun through 5th? what track?

Also i contact Lund about his tunes and the adaptive octane, price, etc...

San Antonio Raceway.

I had to feather it down the track so I didn't slam into the wall.
Old 4/18/11, 08:29 PM
  #33  
Bullitt Member
 
FastRedPonyCar's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 19, 2011
Location: Montgomery, AL
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
numbers look awesome man. I'm really leaning towards the lund 93 street tune right now.

The air raid CAI is on my wish list right now.

When I do my exhaust though, I'm still curious if there would be any real difference between the stock cats and a set of the magnaflow steel core race cats... I want to keep cats on the car to keep the volume down to a tolerable level on the interstate but if there is enough performance increase in the magnaflow cats to make it worth their price vs just leaving the stock ones on, I wouldn't mind knocking those out while I'm under the car swapping on the GT500 muffles.
Old 4/21/11, 10:10 AM
  #34  
Cobra Member
 
SteedaGus's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 14, 2005
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by blk5.0
What did he say about the adaptive octane?
Adaptive octane is nothing new. Its provided with your car from factory. We were keeping the factory octane adaptation from the beginning when we started tuning these cars. Although we were leaving a very wide range at the beginning and not tuning the cars as aggressively as we do now.

We still do the same thing but our current tunes are pretty aggressive and we normally recommend that you stay with the given octane, but if you are on a 93 octane tune and have no choice but to put 91 in our tunes do allow enough control to be able to compensate.

I believe all of the tuning available from the major vendors will do the same thing.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GT/CS Guy
2005-2009 Mustang
4
8/13/15 07:54 PM
Bullitt 3309
5.0L GT Modifications
5
8/2/15 10:20 PM
valanahara
2010-2014 Mustang
2
7/22/15 05:13 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: 5.0 Dyno Results: JLT Cold Air, Lethal O/R X, Bassani Axle Back, Lund Ghost Cams Tune



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 PM.