5.0 Dyno Results...
#1
Dyno'ed my car at Fastlane Performance in Houston today... Awesome shop! Nick and mike gave me a tour and they have some ridiculous stuff in there. ZR9 chevy silverado was pretty awesome. Anyways, I'd highly recommend the shop and I'll be working with them in the future for sure. Here's the verdict...
Mods: Boss intake, Steeda CAI, tune, and Borla catback
Mods: Boss intake, Steeda CAI, tune, and Borla catback
Last edited by Kona Blur; 9/13/11 at 06:07 PM.
#2
Seems low for a dynojet. I would expect this from just a tune and CAI. You would probably see more if you had a o/r x pipe. Did you dyno it in fifth gear? What octane you running?
I guess trap times would really let you know how much power your car is putting down.
have you ever dynoed it stock?
I guess trap times would really let you know how much power your car is putting down.
have you ever dynoed it stock?
#4
Originally Posted by RedCandy5.0
Seems low for a dynojet. I would expect this from just a tune and CAI. You would probably see more if you had a o/r x pipe. Did you dyno it in fifth gear? What octane you running?
I guess trap times would really let you know how much power your car is putting down.
have you ever dynoed it stock?
I guess trap times would really let you know how much power your car is putting down.
have you ever dynoed it stock?
Last edited by Kona Blur; 9/13/11 at 06:05 PM.
#6
349lb of torque? Seems kinda low with your set up. I know you lose low end torque with the Boss 302 intake but still. You better post dyno results after having you LT's installed! Also, I see you dynoed in 5th, would you consider 4th? I read on another site that some people have done that. I'm not a dyno expert by any means so I could be wrong. Anyway, things look good friend.
#8
Originally Posted by BlackMamba03
349lb of torque? Seems kinda low with your set up. I know you lose low end torque with the Boss 302 intake but still. You better post dyno results after having you LT's installed! Also, I see you dynoed in 5th, would you consider 4th? I read on another site that some people have done that. I'm not a dyno expert by any means so I could be wrong. Anyway, things look good friend.
#9
What all did they have to say about the XR-1's? They said the collectors hold them back? I'm not seeing how that's possible seeing as how they're racing exhaust headers but I'm no expert. Keep me posted on what you decide to go with. I agree with them that LT's and an O/R X-pipe would help a ton. You might also want to look into getting a 1 piece driveshaft. Better performance and less rotating mass. Most 1 piece shafts for the 11-12 GT's are weighing 15-20 pounds less than the stock 2 piece. You need to get that low end torque back asap!
Last edited by BlackMamba03; 9/14/11 at 12:05 AM.
#10
Originally Posted by BlackMamba03
What all did they have to say about the XR-1's? They said the collectors hold them back? I'm not seeing how that's possible seeing as how they're racing exhaust headers but I'm no expert. Keep me posted on what you decide to go with. I agree with them that LT's and an O/R X-pipe would help a ton. You might also want to look into getting a 1 piece driveshaft. Better performance and less rotating mass. Most 1 piece shafts for the 11-12 GT's are weighing 15-20 pounds less than the stock 2 piece. You need to get that low end torque back asap!
#11
Ya... They didn't have any dyno's to show me but they said they are consistently seeing the biggest gains with ARH LTs. They said the xr1s look amazing on the car but have small collectors which they attributed to the gains being shy of ARH and kooks systems they've installed. That being said they've only done one pair of xr1s on a new 5.0 thus far so not alot to compare to... They seemed to unanimously feel that ARH had the best system for the new 5.0. Will a new driveshaft help much with torque? I've never modded a car past axle backs and CAI until this one
#12
Nice HP numbers. LTs help a great deal. The Boss intake torque numbers have kept me from that mod but it sure does look good. I went from 362/355 on a Dynojet to 418/397. The LTs give about 20ftlb through power band. I have a very conservative canned tune from Steeda and the A/F was a little rich but that is not bad. It was hot and humid that day. I plan on doing the driveshaft and dyno tune soon. burn rubber....
#13
When I do get LTs do you think I'd see better torque gains if I switched to an ORHpipe as opposed to an ORXpipe? Every time I look into which is better for what I get 50/50 answers...
Last edited by Kona Blur; 9/17/11 at 02:00 PM.
#14
Originally Posted by Kona Blur
When I do get LTs do you think I'd see better torque gains if I switched to an ORHpipe as opposed to an ORXpipe? Every time I look into which is better for what I get 50/50 answers...
#15
Sending you the bill from my chiropractor after looking at those pics
#16
Good numbers and don't worry when you do Longtubes and a blower your TQ will comeback
I made 406rwhp/387rwtq with stock headers Steeda CAI,BlowbyRacing 91 tune and Magnaflow catted X-pipe with comp series catback.
I would go with the ARH 1 7/8 Longtubes I love mine and they fit like a glove and no leaks.
I made 406rwhp/387rwtq with stock headers Steeda CAI,BlowbyRacing 91 tune and Magnaflow catted X-pipe with comp series catback.
I would go with the ARH 1 7/8 Longtubes I love mine and they fit like a glove and no leaks.
#17
Originally Posted by zilla8
Good numbers and don't worry when you do Longtubes and a blower your TQ will comeback
I made 406rwhp/387rwtq with stock headers Steeda CAI,BlowbyRacing 91 tune and Magnaflow catted X-pipe with comp series catback.
I would go with the ARH 1 7/8 Longtubes I love mine and they fit like a glove and no leaks.
I made 406rwhp/387rwtq with stock headers Steeda CAI,BlowbyRacing 91 tune and Magnaflow catted X-pipe with comp series catback.
I would go with the ARH 1 7/8 Longtubes I love mine and they fit like a glove and no leaks.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post