'11 Mustang GT Hellion Turbo Kit at MD Speed Shop!
#1
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Join Date: February 13, 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
'11 Mustang GT Hellion Turbo Kit at MD Speed Shop!
That's right a turbo kit will soon be available for your 2011 Mustang GT. The kit runs at six pounds of boost and produces a whopping 540 RWHP and 600 RWTQ!!! It features a 64mm Billet aluminum turbo wheel for ultra-fast spool times. A ball bearing upgrade is also available.
Call or PM me for turn-key packages. The kit is also available in a "tuner" version without injectors or a handheld tuner
Pics soon to follow.
Call or PM me for turn-key packages. The kit is also available in a "tuner" version without injectors or a handheld tuner
Pics soon to follow.
#2
That's right a turbo kit will soon be available for your 2011 Mustang GT. The kit runs at six pounds of boost and produces a whopping 540 RWHP and 600 RWTQ!!! It features a 64mm Billet aluminum turbo wheel for ultra-fast spool times. A ball bearing upgrade is also available.
Call or PM me for turn-key packages. The kit is also available in a "tuner" version without injectors or a handheld tuner
Pics soon to follow.
Call or PM me for turn-key packages. The kit is also available in a "tuner" version without injectors or a handheld tuner
Pics soon to follow.
#6
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: December 25, 2010
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got a few buddies with 61mm twin hellion turbos in their sn95's. Hot **** those are quick! The single 64mm kicks *** too! Cant wait to see what sort of hell they unleash woth these new 5L engines
#7
Bullitt Member
Join Date: November 19, 2010
Location: Currently in Baghdad
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yea, I'm looking forward to seeing the dyno to take a look at the torque curve. Biggest thing I'm curious about though is what if any lag there is since they are only pushing about 6psi.
#9
Bullitt Member
Join Date: November 19, 2010
Location: Currently in Baghdad
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'll be completely honest in saying I don't know much about either. The biggest difference I know of is a supercharger is always providing boost, but since it is belt driven there is some "parasitic loss". All that really means is you are losing some power to turn the screws. With a turbo being spun by exhaust it takes a certain rpm to get it to spin enough to get any boost, time between pushing the gas and getting full boost from the turbo at least used to be referred to as "turbo lag". There tends to be more lag with the higher boost levels, 6 psi it shouldn't be bad. The bonus of the turbo is you tend to get a bit higher numbers at the tires pushing the same amount of boost as the supercharger.
Again I don't claim to be an expert on this and my facts might be off a bit, but those are pretty much the basics. If someone else wants to chime in that knows more feel free to correct me or add more.
Again I don't claim to be an expert on this and my facts might be off a bit, but those are pretty much the basics. If someone else wants to chime in that knows more feel free to correct me or add more.
#10
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Join Date: February 13, 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lag will be very minimal since it's a relatively small turbo and it has a lightweight billet aluminum turbo wheel for ultra-quick spool times.
#11
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: December 25, 2010
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FCMalie
I'll be completely honest in saying I don't know much about either. The biggest difference I know of is a supercharger is always providing boost, but since it is belt driven there is some "parasitic loss". All that really means is you are losing some power to turn the screws. With a turbo being spun by exhaust it takes a certain rpm to get it to spin enough to get any boost, time between pushing the gas and getting full boost from the turbo at least used to be referred to as "turbo lag". There tends to be more lag with the higher boost levels, 6 psi it shouldn't be bad. The bonus of the turbo is you tend to get a bit higher numbers at the tires pushing the same amount of boost as the supercharger.
Again I don't claim to be an expert on this and my facts might be off a bit, but those are pretty much the basics. If someone else wants to chime in that knows more feel free to correct me or add more.
Again I don't claim to be an expert on this and my facts might be off a bit, but those are pretty much the basics. If someone else wants to chime in that knows more feel free to correct me or add more.
#14
Bullitt Member
Join Date: November 14, 2010
Location: Infront of my PC
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#15
Mach 1 Member
Join Date: December 25, 2010
Location: Honolulu, Hawaii
Posts: 714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Most turbo systems filter air pretty well. But then again i guess it depends where you have em at. Down in the lower fascia i dont think it would be too much of a problem really but idk for sure
#16
Cobra Member
Originally Posted by MustangGTPilot
I did and if that is the sum of filtering (I can only assume a small filter area under the black "cup") whilst sitting low to the ground and dust etc I don't think I'd like that feeding my motor!
#19
GT Member
Join Date: October 4, 2010
Location: Columbus
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#20
Former Vendor
Thread Starter
Join Date: February 13, 2008
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know there has been a lot of controversy about the location of the intercooler. I spoke with Hellion briefly about this.
They said the reason for the intercooler being located there is because the consensus from 2011 owners was that they wanted a turbo kit that didn't require cutting up the front bumper on their brand new car. The intercooler can be lowered very easily, but will require cutting off the lower valence. With a turbo kit running six pounds of boost the heat levels are low anyway.
Hellion also mentioned that where the intercooler is located is pretty much industry standard on any air-to-air forced induction system for the S197 chasis.
They said the reason for the intercooler being located there is because the consensus from 2011 owners was that they wanted a turbo kit that didn't require cutting up the front bumper on their brand new car. The intercooler can be lowered very easily, but will require cutting off the lower valence. With a turbo kit running six pounds of boost the heat levels are low anyway.
Hellion also mentioned that where the intercooler is located is pretty much industry standard on any air-to-air forced induction system for the S197 chasis.