'10-14 Shelby Mustangs

PickupTrucks.com's Road Runner Information is Wrong

Old Sep 30, 2009 | 03:27 PM
  #21  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Don't know how they are going to pickup 45 torque on the current 5.4L while only adding 15HP. Only way they will mathmatically make sense is if they lower the redline. 45 tq extra in the current powercurve will have the engine over 600 at the flywheel.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 04:30 PM
  #22  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by mikeputc
I guess we'll see.

However, I'll point out that our sources have provided correct information about 1.) the 6.7-L 'Scorpion' diesel V-8, including engine architecture (back in April 2008) and 2.) that the 5.0-L will be available for both the Mustang and F-150 (back in January).

We also reported from our Ford sources about the F-100 and that the F-150 will also get a four-cylinder.

I'm going to trust our sources again that "Road Runner" is the code-name for the non-EcoBoost twin turbo 5.0-L V-8.

Stay tuned! :-)
If that's true I wanna put my deposit for a 2012 Shelby NOW
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 04:39 PM
  #23  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
What if the "Roadrunner" is like the Coyote -- 5.0L engine with absolutely no FI..............?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #24  
bpmurr's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 13, 2004
Posts: 2,842
Likes: 0
From: MD
If Ford was smart they'd keep the current 5.4L in the GT500 which is a proven HP beast and then move to a built twin turbo 5.0L just in time for the Z28.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 04:53 PM
  #25  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mikeputc
I guess we'll see.

However, I'll point out that our sources have provided correct information about 1.) the 6.7-L 'Scorpion' diesel V-8, including engine architecture (back in April 2008) and 2.) that the 5.0-L will be available for both the Mustang and F-150 (back in January).

We also reported from our Ford sources about the F-100 and that the F-150 will also get a four-cylinder.

I'm going to trust our sources again that "Road Runner" is the code-name for the non-EcoBoost twin turbo 5.0-L V-8.

Stay tuned! :-)
Mike, our sources are pretty good too.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 05:11 PM
  #26  
3Mach1's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 19, 2006
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by mikeputc
I guess we'll see.

However, I'll point out that our sources have provided correct information about 1.) the 6.7-L 'Scorpion' diesel V-8, including engine architecture (back in April 2008) and 2.) that the 5.0-L will be available for both the Mustang and F-150 (back in January).

We also reported from our Ford sources about the F-100 and that the F-150 will also get a four-cylinder.

I'm going to trust our sources again that "Road Runner" is the code-name for the non-EcoBoost twin turbo 5.0-L V-8.

Stay tuned! :-)
I dont know what to believe because you and Brad are both good sources and honest. I just think your sources are the problem and maybe even Ford does not know what they are going to do. The 6.2 is a prime example with on again off again on again mess we all lived through.

HOw can the road runner be a non ecoboost and twin turbo? Isnt that an oxymoron? You lost me on that one.

Anywho, last I read there were some TT 5.0 prowling around but it was killed for some mechanical reason I cant remember. But on the other hand if they are going to replace the 5.4 and 4.6 with the 5.0 it makes no sense to me to built a 5.4 specifically for a low volume car. Maybe they will work on a SC 5.0 instead of TT?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 05:14 PM
  #27  
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Speculation:

What if the 5.4L Road Runner is not a modular 5.4 but a Coyote 5.0 bored and stroked to 5.4?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 05:35 PM
  #28  
karrnutt's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 24, 2004
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
From: St.Thomas ,Ontario, CANADA
iS THE COYOTE NOT A MOD MOTOR?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #29  
mikeputc's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 30, 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by chevys
I dont know what to believe because you and Brad are both good sources and honest. I just think your sources are the problem and maybe even Ford does not know what they are going to do. The 6.2 is a prime example with on again off again on again mess we all lived through.

HOw can the road runner be a non ecoboost and twin turbo? Isnt that an oxymoron? You lost me on that one.
Yes, I know TMS has excellent sources too. I'm not doubting that. Like I said, stay tuned. I like the point about the 6.2-L.

EcoBoost requires 3 things: major downsizing, boost and direct injection. No DI for Coyote. We could argue if .4 liters less than the 5.4 is 'major' downsizing.

:-)
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 05:45 PM
  #30  
3Mach1's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: August 19, 2006
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Somebody brought up a good point at BON that since the crown vic and E series vans would live through 2011 that maybe they could make a case for the 5.4. Both get 2v versions of the 4.6/5.4 respectively. Not doubting you Mike or Brad. We will just have to wait and see I guess.

By the way, when is the embargo up on the F150 Ecoboost?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 05:47 PM
  #31  
SteelTownStang's Avatar
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Joined: July 1, 2006
Posts: 2,911
Likes: 1
Another reason I'm waiting for the 2011... I hope the order banks are opening in late November as reported.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 06:26 PM
  #32  
Overboost's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by chevys
HOw can the road runner be a non ecoboost and twin turbo? Isnt that an oxymoron? You lost me on that one.
My interpretation of the Ecoboost line is that they're existing FMC engines fitted with a modular package of turbo(s) and DI setup. The 'Road Runner' may be a purpose-built high hp FI motor that is beefed up, not just the Coyote motor with a TT setup slapped on it.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 06:56 PM
  #33  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
EcoBoost thus far has been applied only to low-boost set-ups meant to emphasize efficiency over total possible power. IF they brought out a turbo mill with high boost (and less efficiency emphasis), they'd probably invent a new label (or revive TwinForce?) to separate it from the EcoBoost line.

Originally Posted by karrnutt
iS THE COYOTE NOT A MOD MOTOR?
No, Coyote is brand-spanking new.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #34  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Overboost
My interpretation of the Ecoboost line is that they're existing FMC engines fitted with a modular package of turbo(s) and DI setup. The 'Road Runner' may be a purpose-built high hp FI motor that is beefed up, not just the Coyote motor with a TT setup slapped on it.
Again, I'm willing to bet that the "Roadrunner" will be a low-volume engine, devoid of DI and FI.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 07:04 PM
  #35  
Knight's Avatar
Needs to be more Astony
 
Joined: October 4, 2004
Posts: 8,610
Likes: 5
From: Volo, IL
Originally Posted by SuperSugeKnight
Speculation:

What if the 5.4L Road Runner is not a modular 5.4 but a Coyote 5.0 bored and stroked to 5.4?
good thinking! I'm sure the coyote won't have the bore limitations of the mod motor.

Originally Posted by karrnutt
iS THE COYOTE NOT A MOD MOTOR?
No, the coyote shares nothing with the mod motor. All new! we can finally retire our near 20 year old architechture.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 08:08 PM
  #36  
ahddm's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Road runner is not a 5.0TT, it is the N/A Engine that will going into the Boss.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #37  
TRRBGT's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2008
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
From: Bothell, WA
Originally Posted by ahddm
Road runner is not a 5.0TT, it is the N/A Engine that will going into the Boss.
6.2?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 08:59 PM
  #38  
94gt's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: October 27, 2005
Posts: 324
Likes: 0
Question is will 555hp be enough to kep up with the Z28 which should be on the lots by Sept. 2010?
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 09:49 PM
  #39  
Overboost's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by MARZ
Again, I'm willing to bet that the "Roadrunner" will be a low-volume engine, devoid of DI and FI.
I agree with you there. It won't see duty like the Coyote, but it'll get put in its share of things.
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2009 | 10:44 PM
  #40  
eci's Avatar
eci
Banned
 
Joined: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 94gt
Question is will 555hp be enough to kep up with the Z28 which should be on the lots by Sept. 2010?
1. The Z/28 won't be on the lots IN 2010.

2. The aluminum block GT500 weighs the same as an SS. Once you add the blower and all associated parts, the Z/28 will be over 4,000 lbs.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 PM.