Notices
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs

Ford GT vs '11 GT500 5.4

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/26/10, 08:47 AM
  #1  
GT Member
Thread Starter
 
KatarHol's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 20, 2008
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ford GT vs '11 GT500 5.4

So with the new block,is this closer to the GT engine? What are the main differences?
Old 1/26/10, 08:52 AM
  #2  
Post *****
 
Evil_Capri's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,153
Received 72 Likes on 65 Posts
Dry sump vs. wet sump is a difference . . . .

I haven't seen specs on the block so can't comment on other differences.
Old 1/26/10, 09:00 AM
  #3  
Bullitt Member
 
Dr Evil's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 17, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
knock sensors in the '11, blower is different as well.
Old 1/26/10, 11:57 AM
  #4  
Mach 1 Member
 
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The GT used a true twin screw blower. Made by Lysholm I think, or was it Whipple?
Old 1/26/10, 02:09 PM
  #5  
V6 Member
 
ttgt500's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 20, 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperSugeKnight
The GT used a true twin screw blower. Made by Lysholm I think, or was it Whipple?
Lysholm makes Whipple's rotor sets as well as Kenne Bells. KB and Whipple just make the case and kit.
Old 1/26/10, 02:18 PM
  #6  
Post *****
 
cdynaco's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 14, 2007
Location: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Posts: 20,005
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by ttgt500
Lysholm makes Whipple's rotor sets as well as Kenne Bells. KB and Whipple just make the case and kit.
Well isn't that funny... and look how many GT350 critics lambasted Shelby for using 'off the shelf' parts from other companies...
Old 1/26/10, 04:13 PM
  #7  
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
MARZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SuperSugeKnight
The GT used a true twin screw blower. Made by Lysholm I think, or was it Whipple?
Actually, it was the first and only Eaton twin-screw supercharger. Eaton sourced the rotor packs from Lysholm. Suffice it to say, Eaton has since steered clear from that route; that's why we now have the TVS series of blowers, and not an Eaton twin-screw series of compressors.
Old 1/26/10, 04:16 PM
  #8  
V6 Member
 
ttgt500's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 20, 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Which is too bad, as twin screw > TVS.
Old 1/26/10, 04:19 PM
  #9  
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
MARZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ttgt500
Lysholm makes Whipple's rotor sets as well as Kenne Bells. KB and Whipple just make the case and kit.
Originally Posted by cdynaco
Well isn't that funny... and look how many GT350 critics lambasted Shelby for using 'off the shelf' parts from other companies...
That's not the case anymore, at least from Whipple's standpoint. Whipple had previously sourced their rotor packs from Lysholm. Because of supply issues with Lysholm, Whipple, out of necessity, has since begun making their own rotors, dubbed the "Gen II" rotors / compressors. The "Gen II" rotors feature an advanced profile and flow much more air at the same psi as compared to their Lysholm-sourced "Gen I" counterparts.

The supply issue, or lack thereof, is what also ultimately led Eaton to abandon making twin-screw superchargers of their own.

Kenne Bell used to source their 4/6 rotors from Autorotor, but have since changed suppliers as well. They're made somewhere in Sweden, if I'm not mistaken.
Old 1/26/10, 04:20 PM
  #10  
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
MARZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ttgt500
Which is too bad, as twin screw > TVS.
At low boost, I doubt you'll see much, if any, difference. Compare a 2.8L KB to a 2.3L Eaton TVS though, like MM&FF did, and you'll definitely see a difference.
Old 1/26/10, 04:23 PM
  #11  
V6 Member
 
ttgt500's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 20, 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Low boost? What's that? I never see low boost!
Old 1/26/10, 04:24 PM
  #12  
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
MARZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ttgt500
Low boost? What's that? I never see low boost!
LOL, some of us never get above 8-10 psi.
Old 1/26/10, 04:26 PM
  #13  
V6 Member
 
ttgt500's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 20, 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
TVS is great for a street GT500 though I agree.
Old 1/26/10, 04:30 PM
  #14  
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
MARZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just FYI, both the Saleen and new SMS superchargers use Lysholm-sourced rotors ("screws"). The SMS unit also uses Lysholm's cylindrical "Laminova" intercooler cores.

EDIT: Vortech's new VTS line of twin-screw superchargers use Lysholm rotors, too.

Last edited by MARZ; 1/26/10 at 06:24 PM.
Old 1/26/10, 06:34 PM
  #15  
Member
 
S7MS's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 27, 2007
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Evil_Capri
Dry sump vs. wet sump is a difference . . . .

I haven't seen specs on the block so can't comment on other differences.
The aluminum block in the '11 GT500 is not a dry sump. This isn't the Ford GT engine. Ford has offered a wet sump 5.4 aluminum block for some time now.
Old 1/26/10, 06:50 PM
  #16  
Bullitt Member
 
Dr Evil's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 17, 2007
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
cams are different as well as the exhaust valves
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ecostang
'10-14 V6 Modifications
1661
11/3/22 08:50 PM
JonathonK
GT350
6
9/17/15 10:13 AM
Last1
Suspension, Brakes, and Tire Tech
7
9/5/15 01:23 PM



Quick Reply: Ford GT vs '11 GT500 5.4



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:07 AM.