JEFF IS GETTING A KB installed!!! busted!!
Your tune is the each to all issues and problems and promises. A bad tune will kill a car even without a SC
Even worst is a person that can't carry a tune...
I can tune the radio.
Or a piano.... but not a fish.
No tuna? What a drag
Ok, change of subject before we get this thread closed too...
Escargo? Is this PC
Once again .......Swine!
LOL
LOL
Took off Friday from work, so up at an extra-early time this AM. I'm reading from this thread that we'll be out at the TNT this Friday PM? Awesome 
I've not yet had the chance to run the car.
For Jeff - the 2.6H, from everything I've read from KB's site and from what Jim Bell and Kurtis told me, will make less lower-end hp and tq, than the regular 2.6. At higher boost rates, the H will make more power and torque, but at 8 PSI, it loses volumetric effeciency. I'd like to take a ride in yours (not sure what other non-SC mods you have...knew you had the tuner and such, but most of those are replicated or replaced by the SC, I'd like to take a ride in yours), and then we'll take a ride in mine and compare.
I've not yet had the chance to run the car.For Jeff - the 2.6H, from everything I've read from KB's site and from what Jim Bell and Kurtis told me, will make less lower-end hp and tq, than the regular 2.6. At higher boost rates, the H will make more power and torque, but at 8 PSI, it loses volumetric effeciency. I'd like to take a ride in yours (not sure what other non-SC mods you have...knew you had the tuner and such, but most of those are replicated or replaced by the SC, I'd like to take a ride in yours), and then we'll take a ride in mine and compare.
Interesting about the 2 different SC. Makes sense about the volume thing. I hadn't even thought of that. Are either of you KB fellas considering Long Tubes?
I'm considering long tubes, but waiting on the lottery to purchase
I have a long tube already...
I have a tube sock if you need it Paul... its old school addidas.. thats if you want to wrap it to keep the heat down
Took off Friday from work, so up at an extra-early time this AM. I'm reading from this thread that we'll be out at the TNT this Friday PM? Awesome I've not yet had the chance to run the car.
For Jeff - the 2.6H, from everything I've read from KB's site and from what Jim Bell and Kurtis told me, will make less lower-end hp and tq, than the regular 2.6. At higher boost rates, the H will make more power and torque, but at 8 PSI, it loses volumetric effeciency. I'd like to take a ride in yours (not sure what other non-SC mods you have...knew you had the tuner and such, but most of those are replicated or replaced by the SC, I'd like to take a ride in yours), and then we'll take a ride in mine and compare.
I've not yet had the chance to run the car.For Jeff - the 2.6H, from everything I've read from KB's site and from what Jim Bell and Kurtis told me, will make less lower-end hp and tq, than the regular 2.6. At higher boost rates, the H will make more power and torque, but at 8 PSI, it loses volumetric effeciency. I'd like to take a ride in yours (not sure what other non-SC mods you have...knew you had the tuner and such, but most of those are replicated or replaced by the SC, I'd like to take a ride in yours), and then we'll take a ride in mine and compare.
Also interesting. Jeff what about the headers. Long tubes in the future?
I'' have more HP and torque due to the lightweight DS which frees up HP in the driveline, plus I have 410 gears so it will react much differently than with 355s. You are correct about the higher boost but we spoke with Jim Bell and he claimed my loss at 8lbs boost would only be 5hp which I more than make up for with the DS
I see Hoosier QTPro's or ET Streets in the future!!!A blower and 4:10 gears makes for traction issues even with DR's.. Let us know how the session went!! Either way it will be a blast, would love to see it run!!!!
with that power... if he uses true slicks... He'll probably break at least an axle. I'd beef it if up a little more Jeff.
