2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Stock A6 5.0 - 12.73 @ 115

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2010 | 07:51 PM
  #81  
kaler's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 27, 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Dragstart I would have to agree. A 14.00 pass should be right at 100mph that is why alot of tracks have 14.00 or 100mph = helmet so a 14.41 @ 104 seems way high.I will pay attention to the cars running close to 14 flat next time I go to Sac.
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 08:50 PM
  #82  
Destin's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 15, 2010
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: GA
Now if they would only give us a manual shift mode and make the Brembos available with the auto.
Reply
Old May 27, 2010 | 11:58 PM
  #83  
Stinger's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 9, 2004
Posts: 52
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by kaler
Dragstart I would have to agree. A 14.00 pass should be right at 100mph that is why alot of tracks have 14.00 or 100mph = helmet so a 14.41 @ 104 seems way high.I will pay attention to the cars running close to 14 flat next time I go to Sac.
There is no "X" et = "Y" mph. Spinning can skew the relationship greatly. Just for comparison, I once ran 14.3@103.8 in my SVO.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 12:40 AM
  #84  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
and i saw a 14.49 @ 152mph
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 12:58 AM
  #85  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by Stinger
There is no "X" et = "Y" mph. Spinning can skew the relationship greatly. Just for comparison, I once ran 14.3@103.8 in my SVO.
Lol 13.6x @ 115-116 for me on.... eh a lot of times.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 12:58 AM
  #86  
kaler's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 27, 2010
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Ok I understand there are a **** load of variables, On average a 14.41 does not = 104
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 03:21 AM
  #87  
All-Or-Nothing's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 10, 2009
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Personally I think his times and speed are correct.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 05:54 AM
  #88  
DeathChill's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: December 20, 2009
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by All-Or-Nothing
Personally I think his times and speed are correct.
I think the leap from the 1/8 to the 1/4 trap is too high, but we'll have to wait to find out. Plus, isn't 115 close to what 'Vette's trap with 430 HP and less weight? That doesn't seem off to you?

Plus, people have been saying that the track is known for pushing up trap speed; once again though we'll have to wait and see!
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 05:59 AM
  #89  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
The auto is geared differently seems like the auto's have a lot of top end.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 07:10 AM
  #90  
IT_Guru's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2010
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Niles, Mi
I'm not sure why everyone is so surprised, Ford said from the beggining that the Auto wasn't going to sacrifice any performance. Auto's have come a long way - even without an auto stick feature. Sure a manual is more fun, but I'm glad to see that for people like me that wanted the convienence of an auto, we didn't have to sacrifice performance.

Last edited by IT_Guru; May 28, 2010 at 07:13 AM.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 07:35 AM
  #91  
BLKCLOUD's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: April 29, 2010
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
Assuming the performance of this car turns out to be about what can be expected from other A6s (taking weather, track conditions, etc into account), then color me surprised - pleasantly so. Regardless of what Ford says, they don't have a good reputation when it comes to performance automatic transmissions, so I am/was skeptical.

Hopefully my skepticism is now misplaced. The 12.73 in this thread goes a LONG way towards making that so.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 07:40 AM
  #92  
IT_Guru's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: March 3, 2010
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
From: Niles, Mi
I guess I haven't driven a Ford automatic in awhile, the auto in my A4 was very good. I wonder how the GT Auto will run with a tune?
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 08:07 AM
  #93  
Adam's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: March 12, 2004
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
This isn't a new transmission
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 08:14 AM
  #94  
Thomas S's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 29, 2005
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by Adam2004
This isn't a new transmission

?? It is for the Mustang.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 08:21 AM
  #95  
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2010
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 1
From: S.E. Texas
Originally Posted by Adam2004
This isn't a new transmission
Relatively new, only been out a short while in trucks.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 09:50 AM
  #96  
Falc'man's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Adam2004
This isn't a new transmission
Yes it is. It's a copy of ZF's 6HP26/28 premium box, which is still one of the best autos you'll find on the market. Miles ahead of any GM or (previous) Ford auto.

We have the ZF's here in the Falcons and they're generally as quick, if not quicker, than the manuals.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 10:10 AM
  #97  
Adam's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: March 12, 2004
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Originally Posted by Falc'man
Yes it is. It's a copy of ZF's 6HP26/28 premium box, which is still one of the best autos you'll find on the market. Miles ahead of any GM or (previous) Ford auto.

We have the ZF's here in the Falcons and they're generally as quick, if not quicker, than the manuals.
Ford has been using it in other vehicles before the Mustang. Gearing may be different, I don't know.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 10:38 AM
  #98  
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: February 18, 2010
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 1
From: S.E. Texas
Originally Posted by Falc'man
Yes it is. It's a copy of ZF's 6HP26/28 premium box, which is still one of the best autos you'll find on the market. Miles ahead of any GM or (previous) Ford auto.

We have the ZF's here in the Falcons and they're generally as quick, if not quicker, than the manuals.
Originally Posted by Adam2004
Ford has been using it in other vehicles before the Mustang. Gearing may be different, I don't know.
6R60/80 tranny has been in use since 2006 in the exploder/mountaineer then in 2007 in expiditions.

So, we have a truck rated tranny in the new Mustangs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_6R_transmission

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 10:41 AM
  #99  
BLKCLOUD's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: April 29, 2010
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, TN
I don't care what it was used in before, when it was used before, or what/when it might be used in later. All I really care about is how it performs in the Mustang. First reports are very good. Hopefully it stays that way.
Reply
Old May 28, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #100  
fdjizm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: June 6, 2008
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Ltngdrvr
6R60/80 tranny has been in use since 2006 in the exploder/mountaineer then in 2007 in expiditions.

So, we have a truck rated tranny in the new Mustangs.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ford_6R_transmission

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++
Sounds good, just means it's proven.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:10 PM.