2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Start the Presses!

Old Oct 15, 2008 | 03:14 PM
  #1  
Topnotch's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 31, 2004
Posts: 3,045
Likes: 2
From: NYC
Start the Presses!

Will the 2010 Mustang Be Able To Keep Up in the Ponycar Wars?
http://wot.motortrend.com/6306885/fu...ars/index.html
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 03:22 PM
  #2  
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
They forgot to mention the 500lbs weight difference. Horsepower is everything.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 03:52 PM
  #3  
STANG-22's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 4, 2007
Posts: 97
Likes: 1
Unfortuneately for Camero, the real world is not between stop lights, nor on the race course. It's getting to and from work, and hauling the groceries where the Stang is king "fun and cheap to keep", and/or out sells the Chevy's. In the sales world money talks, bullsh*t walks. Now about that bridge you're trying to sell me...
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:10 PM
  #4  
sgt d's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 14, 2008
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: texan in the ghanistan
the average buyer does not or will not care about the weight, they look at the top numbers and see the v6 makes as much power as the v8 mustang.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:14 PM
  #5  
StangMahn's Avatar
NTTAWWT
 
Joined: January 27, 2007
Posts: 14,456
Likes: 35
From: That town you drive through to get to Myrtle Beach
I'll still take the Stang! the camaro will die in about 4 years...again, and lets face it, there's no way you're going to be able to get one close to MSRP for at least a year
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:17 PM
  #6  
Vermillion06's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2006
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
From: NV
Originally Posted by sgt d
the average buyer does not or will not care about the weight, they look at the top numbers and see the v6 makes as much power as the v8 mustang.
That's the 2009 v8 Mustang. The 2010 V8 Mustang is another story.

The 350z and G37 V6s make as much HP as the 2005-2009 V8 Mustangs, but that didn't help their sales.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:43 PM
  #7  
codeman94's Avatar
 
Joined: December 14, 2004
Posts: 7,933
Likes: 16
From: Goshen, IN
oh boy...and i can hear it now...

"Since the 2010 mustang wasnt good enough to compete with the Camaro, Ford decided to go with the 5.0/6 speed for 2011 in attempt to keep up...."

Last edited by codeman94; Oct 15, 2008 at 05:09 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 04:57 PM
  #8  
sgt d's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 14, 2008
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: texan in the ghanistan
^^right

i would dare say that typically the person looking for a mustang would look at the camaro and the challenger. not so much a 350 or infiniti as those are a different car, import, and a different price point:shrug:

Last edited by sgt d; Oct 15, 2008 at 04:59 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 05:17 PM
  #9  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
The Camaro was the more powerful car, right to the point to where it went on hiatus for six years. I think the Mustang will do just fine.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 06:30 PM
  #10  
houtex's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 2, 2004
Posts: 7,648
Likes: 675
From: Insane
"the V-6 Camaro puts out the same amount of horsepower as a current V-8 Mustang GT (300 hp)"
"a base V-6 Challenger offers 250 hp for just $2000 more than a similar Mustang"

The Challenger V6 is iffy, but at that range... The insurance on a Camaro V6 and a Mustang GT ought to be exactly the same, right?

If the point of lower performance/hp=college V6 insurance rates... There's no way the Camaro V6 could be purchased by the college folk.

Or... am I missing the point of a V6 in the first place? Besides the obvious CAFE rules, of course.

/stirring... but with a purpose. I intend to understand this silliness re: insurance and V6. I can wrap both a V6 and a V8 around a tree very easily. Just gimme the cars, and I'll show ya.
//well... maybe not. I would want to not be in the hospital, thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 07:02 PM
  #11  
Clino's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2008
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
I'm still stickin' to my guns and saying that the 5.0 will not be 400hp in the GT like we are hoping. I think it will be 325-350 as this article mentions and 400hp in the Boss. Even then, with the weight advantage it will still give the SS a good run.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 07:31 PM
  #12  
StangMahn's Avatar
NTTAWWT
 
Joined: January 27, 2007
Posts: 14,456
Likes: 35
From: That town you drive through to get to Myrtle Beach
I guess they just dont realize that ford doesnt push their engines as hard as everyone else. the potential is certaintly there, but less power=longer lasting engine
If you want the extra power, $1000 will get you that power in aftermarket mods
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 08:47 PM
  #13  
MARZ's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Aficionado
 
Joined: November 23, 2006
Posts: 1,863
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Clino
I'm still stickin' to my guns and saying that the 5.0 will not be 400hp in the GT like we are hoping. I think it will be 325-350 as this article mentions and 400hp in the Boss. Even then, with the weight advantage it will still give the SS a good run.
I wouldn't put too much credence into what Motor Trend has to say. If Ford is going to go through the trouble of engineering a brand-new engine (well, okay, not "brand-new," since it's based off the current modular engine architecture), I'm willing to bet it'll sport more than a 25-50 horsepower improvement over the current mill. Otherwise, why bother? Engineering resources are finite.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 09:04 PM
  #14  
Tony Alonso's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2004
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by StangMahn
the camaro will die in about 4 years...again,
Why do you say that?
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 10:11 PM
  #15  
Bennyandthejets's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: July 28, 2005
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
From: Houston
Originally Posted by Tony Alonso
Why do you say that?

tradition mostly
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 11:26 PM
  #16  
laserred38's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: January 6, 2006
Posts: 14,053
Likes: 166
From: Bay Area, CA
Hmm...it's not likely, but if the 2010 comes with 350hp I think I would buy one for that gold color, and not worry about the 2011. 350 crank hp and 3.73s? It would be a decently fun car and would make me think long and hard to not wait for the 2011 5.0 which WILL have a long waiting list and ADMs, not to mention a higher MSRP to start with. They aren't going to give away a pretty much new engine for free. It has been said the 5.0 in the 2011 isn't as related to the 4.6/5.4 as the current engines are. It is a very incremental difference, but knowing that the Shelby GTs and Bullitts had pretty much 315-325hp, that fact alone would deter me away from the 2010. But if the GT can squeeze another 25hp out of the 4.6 3V, I would consider it long and hard..anyone else agree?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 01:44 AM
  #17  
mjbarnet's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Iowa City
Originally Posted by laserred38
Hmm...it's not likely, but if the 2010 comes with 350hp I think I would buy one for that gold color, and not worry about the 2011. 350 crank hp and 3.73s? It would be a decently fun car and would make me think long and hard to not wait for the 2011 5.0 which WILL have a long waiting list and ADMs, not to mention a higher MSRP to start with. They aren't going to give away a pretty much new engine for free. It has been said the 5.0 in the 2011 isn't as related to the 4.6/5.4 as the current engines are. It is a very incremental difference, but knowing that the Shelby GTs and Bullitts had pretty much 315-325hp, that fact alone would deter me away from the 2010. But if the GT can squeeze another 25hp out of the 4.6 3V, I would consider it long and hard..anyone else agree?
I think if ford squeezes 350hp out of a 2010 4.6v setup with the 5-speed and 3.73 gears there wll be a lot of takers!
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #18  
KGray571's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: June 3, 2008
Posts: 64
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by laserred38
Hmm...it's not likely, but if the 2010 comes with 350hp I think I would buy one for that gold color, and not worry about the 2011. 350 crank hp and 3.73s? It would be a decently fun car and would make me think long and hard to not wait for the 2011 5.0 which WILL have a long waiting list and ADMs, not to mention a higher MSRP to start with. They aren't going to give away a pretty much new engine for free. It has been said the 5.0 in the 2011 isn't as related to the 4.6/5.4 as the current engines are. It is a very incremental difference, but knowing that the Shelby GTs and Bullitts had pretty much 315-325hp, that fact alone would deter me away from the 2010. But if the GT can squeeze another 25hp out of the 4.6 3V, I would consider it long and hard..anyone else agree?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2008 | 07:04 PM
  #19  
Clino's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2008
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver
I can't see them doing anything drastic to the existing engine being that it would only be for a year. That pretty much leaves off the shelf bolt-ons which the Bullitt/Shelby GT already have already shown to be worth about 15hp. I don't think we'll see anymore than that in 2010.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
09-gt/cs
GT Performance Mods
9
Oct 15, 2015 10:03 AM
GLOCKer
General Mustang Chat
2
Sep 28, 2015 05:20 PM
tacbear
Mustang Motorsports
0
Sep 27, 2015 12:57 PM
Christopher Fox Wallace
Fox Mustangs
1
Sep 26, 2015 11:55 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:19 PM.