The Return of the 5-Litre...TT style
#22
Needs to be more Astony
#23
I Have No Life
Thread Starter
Sounds like GM will have 2 V6 options.
A base and a 300hp V6
Wonder if the 3.5Tforce is going to be its direct competition
or a SE package.
A base and a 300hp V6
Wonder if the 3.5Tforce is going to be its direct competition
or a SE package.
#25
And by this point even the argument that a turbo options adds cost doesn't hold as much water, at least no when the same is employed in high voume applications, since mainstream turbo options allow Ford to offer several different V8 engines with vastly different peak power output and torque curves without the need to offer several different engine displacements which limits flexibility and increasing the need for rigid production plans, etc.....which increases costs. Covering more bases with the same basic block and heads means fewer part numbers in the factories, a far more flexible manufacturing system, and lower costs on the books, even after taking the cost of the turbo systems themselves into consideration.
#26
Needs to be more Astony
The only reason i say that it will not be TT in GT form is that a 5.0 even with super low boost will be putting out 450hp minimum. There is no way a 2010 mustang GT that can be had for just over 25k will have that kind of hp.
#27
I agree which is why I think it may be with direct injection. But ford is supposed to be swinging back toward pushrod and larger displacement. I do know that twin force is slated for the new f150.
#28
If Chevy does have something like this planned which seems extremely likely, and Ford knows it which is also very likely, then a 425-450hp Mustang GT for 2010-2011 isn't that much of a stretch. Since a low pressure, turbo 5.0L V8 could easily fall within that range of power this isn't a huge stretch. Further, if Ford doesm have plans to slot a naturally aspirated 'budget V8' offering in under the new GT, a move which is entirely believable given the push for resonably priced alternatives to the GT, the GT coupe might grow into a 28-30k plus car which makes the above even more believable.
Virtually all of the above is mere speculation, but it fits into a scenario which leaves room for a realistic, low dollar, twin turbo V8 Mustang GT wether the engine is standard or optional.
#30
#32
On thing that Ford hasn't said much of anything about is DI on NA engines. One would have to think that if Ford management has any brains we'll see DI brought to all Ford engines, NA and PI.
#33
#34
A TF 5.0 V8 should be easily capable of >500 HP and 600 HP with any sort of modest boost. I agree that it would be extremely unlikely that we'd see that sort of HP in a mainstream GT model.
#35
There is absolutely no reason why Ford couldn't produce a 5.0L TT V8 designed primarily for driveability, an accessable power range (great low end and mid range torque), and above average mileage that makes a bit less than 450hp. In fact, there are several factors which make the same a great idea and virtually nothing to detract from the positives. Potentially cost, mileage, emissions, driveability, and tunability all stand to gain from the use of a low pressure 5.0L TT V8 in lieu of a larger displacement V8.
Wether Ford will build something like this is another question entirely. But coupled with a truly budget minded n/a V8 sister 'LX' style car the same would represent the kind of innovation which could once again cast the Mustang as the undisputed leader in budget minded performance that works in the real worold.
#36
Legacy TMS Member
Nope, that is Don Knowles car and it is most definetly an OHC engine. By the looks of it I'd say it was a 2v Mod motor - Don Knowles is attatched to Roush and Roush has mentioned working on big inch mod motors in the neighborhood of 6 liters.
#37
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm morally opposed to the LX tag as it brings to mind big family sedans with faux wood panels. If there's going to be a model between the base and GT, they/we need to think up a more interesting name.
#38
FR500 Member
Join Date: August 15, 2005
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 3,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh well, just repeating what the mag said, although I also have heard the rumors about that engine being a OHC design. Guess I was being hopeful in addition to being wrong. So the "Hurricane/Boss" or whatever that engine development program is called wasn't destined to be a new family of pushrod engines for truck and eventually car applications?
#39
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh well, just repeating what the mag said, although I also have heard the rumors about that engine being a OHC design. Guess I was being hopeful in addition to being wrong. So the "Hurricane/Boss" or whatever that engine development program is called wasn't destined to be a new family of pushrod engines for truck and eventually car applications?