2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Interesting Article on Next Gen Stang...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12/1/06, 08:12 PM
  #61  
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
V10's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
Ford needs to build BETTER products than its competitors in order to regain market share. Vehicles which are "almost as good" won't sway customers, and if that strategy continues, then yes, I give the company less than a 50% chance of survival.

Duh, too bad nobody @ Ford can figure this out.

Ford has continually set its new vehicle targets at what the competition is already selling. Then once the vehicle is introduced 3 years behind the competition, the bean counters further cost reduce & decontent them.
Old 12/4/06, 07:14 AM
  #62  
Cobra Member
 
GTJOHN's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
True, but GM & Chrysler have followed Ford as well - SUV, Crossovers and now bringing back the Camaro & Challenger due to high Mustang sales.

If Ford is guilty of anything, its not upgrading its existing products. The Japs & Euro's have taken some of Fords ideas and have made them just as good or even better!

As much as I hate to see a new Camaro or Challenger, in a way I am glad to see them return. If not, we all know Ford wouldn't have done upgrades on the Mustang for years!

I get mad when I see cars like the Lincoln LS and T-Bird get thrown away. All the LS needed was a little TLC, and with some minor changes and lower price tag, the T-Bird would of sold a lot more.

How about updating the Crown Vic? It hasn't changed much since the freakin 1980's.
Old 12/4/06, 08:15 PM
  #63  
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
V10's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by GTJOHN
If Ford is guilty of anything, its not upgrading its existing products. The Japs & Euro's have taken some of Fords ideas and have made them just as good or even better!

I get mad when I see cars like the Lincoln LS and T-Bird get thrown away. All the LS needed was a little TLC, and with some minor changes and lower price tag, the T-Bird would of sold a lot more.

How about updating the Crown Vic? It hasn't changed much since the freakin 1980's.
An exampe of what I'm talking about with Ford being behind 3 years behind the competition is the new D35 V6 engine. While Ford and it's fans are going crazy over the D35, it doesn't break any new ground and is at best parity in terms of HP & TQ to what other manufacturers like Nissan have been selling for the last 3 - 4 years.

As I mentioned before, not only does Ford not upgrade its cars, the bean counters pull equipment off them putting them farther behind.

The LS was killed because Ford claimed they were loosing money on them. The reason why the LS was loosing money was that Ford killed the other D/EW-98 models that were planned when the LS & D/EW-98 were being developed. So Ford lost the econmies of scale required to make the LS profitable. The Lincoln LS was one of the best vehicles that Ford ever built. It wouldn't have taken much work to made it near perfect.

The engineers have been trying to get a major update on the Panter platform CC, GM, TC. The bean counters keep killing any more updates so Panther sales keep sagging. The Panther is in dire need of a whole new interior, but I doubt it will ever happen even though for most of the last 10 years the Panther cars were some of the VERY few cars (I said cars not trucks / SUVs) that were profitable for for Ford. Ford will just let them die away.
Old 12/5/06, 06:28 AM
  #64  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
I think the reason why people are raving about the D35 engine is the ability for it to produce a good ammount of juice on 87, and its expandablity.

IIRC the Nissan VQ is pretty tapped to its potential by now (less force induction)

Just like the 4.6 3v
@ 300hp on 87 octane, isn't really anything to sneeze at.
Of course everyone is drunk on horsepower and wants MORE

I just hope the BOSS engines have the refinement of the D35 and its variants. It's a well built engine.
Old 12/5/06, 09:57 AM
  #65  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,973
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by Boomer
I think the reason why people are raving about the D35 engine is the ability for it to produce a good ammount of juice on 87, and its expandablity.

IIRC the Nissan VQ is pretty tapped to its potential by now (less force induction)

Just like the 4.6 3v
@ 300hp on 87 octane, isn't really anything to sneeze at.
Of course everyone is drunk on horsepower and wants MORE

I just hope the BOSS engines have the refinement of the D35 and its variants. It's a well built engine.
That's exactly what impresses me about the D35.
Old 12/5/06, 07:15 PM
  #66  
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
V10's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TomServo92
That's exactly what impresses me about the D35.
The Nissian 3.5 V6 is currently rated @ 255 HP / 252 lb ft on 87 octane & 270 HP / 258 lb ft on 91 octane, as used in the Altima & Maxima. And 300 HP in the 350Z on 91 octane.

Nissian also has a 4.0L version out as used in its SUVs.

The 300HP versions have VVT on both intake & exhaust valves, the D35 has VVT on only the intake.

The Toyota 3.5L V6 is rated @ 268 HP & 248 lb ft on 87 octane. It also has VVT on both the intake & exhaust valves.

Again, the D35 pretty much parity with the competition.
Old 12/5/06, 07:59 PM
  #67  
Closet American
 
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by V10
The Nissian 3.5 V6 is currently rated @ 255 HP / 252 lb ft on 87 octane & 270 HP / 258 lb ft on 91 octane, as used in the Altima & Maxima. And 300 HP in the 350Z on 91 octane.

Nissian also has a 4.0L version out as used in its SUVs.

The 300HP versions have VVT on both intake & exhaust valves, the D35 has VVT on only the intake.

The Toyota 3.5L V6 is rated @ 268 HP & 248 lb ft on 87 octane. It also has VVT on both the intake & exhaust valves.

Again, the D35 pretty much parity with the competition.
Exactly. And the rumor is that the forthcoming G35 coupe will get a 3.7L VQ, possibly good for 330+ HP.

Of course, the V8 will always remain the winner when it comes to torque, which, at the end of the day, is what propels your vehicle.
Old 12/5/06, 08:44 PM
  #68  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,973
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by V10
The Nissian 3.5 V6 is currently rated @ 255 HP / 252 lb ft on 87 octane & 270 HP / 258 lb ft on 91 octane, as used in the Altima & Maxima. And 300 HP in the 350Z on 91 octane.
I'm not sure that's correct. Here's a direct quote from the 2007 Maxima owners manual:

NISSAN recommends the use of unleaded premium
gasoline with an octane rating of at least 91
AKI (Anti-Knock Index) number (Research octane
number 96). If unleaded premium gasoline is
not available you may use unleaded regular gasoline
with an octane rating of at least 87 AKI
number (Research octane number 91), but you
may notice a decrease in performance.

It sounds to me like you only get the 255 if you use 91. In fact, the 3.5L in the Murano, which is also tuned for 91 (per the owner's manual), only makes 240HP.

The Toyota 3.5L V6 is rated @ 268 HP & 248 lb ft on 87 octane. It also has VVT on both the intake & exhaust valves.

It also has direct injection and only makes 3 more HP and LESS torque. Suddenly it doesn't sound that impressive anymore to me...

The 300HP versions have VVT on both intake & exhaust valves, the D35 has VVT on only the intake.

That means we haven't seen the full potential of the D35 yet.
Old 12/5/06, 09:59 PM
  #69  
Closet American
 
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TomServo92
That means we haven't seen the full potential of the D35 yet.
I think perhaps what he means is that we need to be seeing that full potential RIGHT NOW.

Waiting for Chapter 7 is too late.
Old 12/5/06, 10:06 PM
  #70  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,973
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by BC_Shelby
I think perhaps what he means is that we need to be seeing that full potential RIGHT NOW.

Waiting for Chapter 7 is too late.
I suppose that's true but financial difficulties aside, the D35 produces similar power with a lot less technology (which is what I find impressive). IF Ford can survive the current crisis, then maybe we'll see exactly what can be done WITH all that technology incorporated. Perhaps the 3.7L going into the MKS will be the showcase for the D35 family.
Old 12/5/06, 10:10 PM
  #71  
Closet American
 
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 17, 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Posts: 5,848
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TomServo92
Perhaps the 3.7L going into the MKS will be the showcase for the D35 family.
It sounds like a distinct possibility - and I hope you're right. That would definitely be the car in which to introduce it.
Old 12/5/06, 11:15 PM
  #72  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I just hope taht the D35 doesn't pull a 99 Cobra on us.
Old 12/6/06, 05:36 AM
  #73  
Cobra Member
 
GTJOHN's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 25, 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Has anybody on this board test driven or bought a new MKZ? If so, what did you think of the ride and the power?
Old 12/6/06, 06:42 AM
  #74  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,973
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by GTJOHN
Has anybody on this board test driven or bought a new MKZ? If so, what did you think of the ride and the power?
Test driving one is on my list but I just haven't gotten around to it yet.
Old 12/6/06, 01:46 PM
  #75  
GT Member
 
JETSOLVER's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 30, 2004
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
D35 made Wards top 10 engines list. Along with the 3 valve 4.6 again. And one or two others.....

http://wardsauto.com/home/best_engines_winners/
Old 12/6/06, 02:10 PM
  #76  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,973
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by JETSOLVER
D35 made Wards top 10 engines list. Along with the 3 valve 4.6 again. And one or two others.....

http://wardsauto.com/home/best_engines_winners/
Sweet!
Old 12/6/06, 06:01 PM
  #77  
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
V10's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TomServo92
It sounds to me like you only get the 255 if you use 91. In fact, the 3.5L in the Murano, which is also tuned for 91 (per the owner's manual), only makes 240HP.



It also has direct injection and only makes 3 more HP and LESS torque. Suddenly it doesn't sound that impressive anymore to me...
We have a conflict in sales info as the Nissian web site says 255 HP on 87 octane and max power with 91 octane.

Under the Altima it says 270 HP with 91 octane.

I'd imagine the Toyotal 3.5 with direct injection will get better gas milage than the D35. I'd call +3 HP & -2 lb ft a total wash in power ratings.

Again, the competition is selling direct injection and dual VVT TODAY!
When will Ford be selling engines with that technology?
Old 12/6/06, 08:08 PM
  #78  
Legacy TMS Member
 
TomServo92's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 18, 2004
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 3,973
Received 28 Likes on 24 Posts
Originally Posted by V10
We have a conflict in sales info as the Nissian web site says 255 HP on 87 octane and max power with 91 octane.

Under the Altima it says 270 HP with 91 octane.
Here's what the Nissan site actually says:

Use regular unleaded fuel with 87 octane. For maximum power, use premium fuel.
It doesn't say you get 255HP on 87 (at least not that I can find).

I'd imagine the Toyotal 3.5 with direct injection will get better gas milage than the D35. I'd call +3 HP & -2 lb ft a total wash in power ratings.
It's a wash except that the Toyota doesn't generate that much power given all the techno built into it.

Again, the competition is selling direct injection and dual VVT TODAY!
When will Ford be selling engines with that technology?
Now that's a good question! Like I said before, maybe we'll see it in the Lincoln 3.7L.
Old 12/7/06, 03:55 PM
  #79  
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
V10's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by JETSOLVER
D35 made Wards top 10 engines list. Along with the 3 valve 4.6 again. And one or two others.....

http://wardsauto.com/home/best_engines_winners/
And Nissan's VQ V6 once again made Ward's top 10 list. I think it's the 5th year.

And the new Toyota V6 made Ward's to 10 list.

As I said, the D35 is parity with the competition, not clearly better.
Old 12/7/06, 03:56 PM
  #80  
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
V10's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by TomServo92
Here's what the Nissan site actually says:
It doesn't say you get 255HP on 87 (at least not that I can find).
That's what it says for the Maxima.

But it says 270 HP on 91 octane in the Altima.

In any case with 91 octane the Nissian 3.5L VQ puts out 287 & 300 HP in its 2 different version in the 350Z and 298 HP in the G35. Clearly more than the D35.


Quick Reply: Interesting Article on Next Gen Stang...



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 AM.