2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Hi, and here is some info!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:48 PM
  #1  
Kyle2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 13, 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Hi, and here is some info!

Hey everyone, I am new and have been frequenting the forum lately for a couple months now. So I decided to register when I found this link. It looks to be from this Igor you guys so often refer to.

http://www.autosavant.net/2008/02/details-emerge-on-new-mustang-gt-engine.html


Enjoy, I was leaning towards the Camaro but wow, this is it...especially if there is weight reduction with the upcoming Mustang.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #2  
StangPower05's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 12, 2006
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: U.S.A
Wow! Good news! I wonder what the displacment will be on the new motor!
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #3  
Kyle2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 13, 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Lol...it says 5.0L in the article but =P
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 10:13 PM
  #4  
StangPower05's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: June 12, 2006
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
From: U.S.A
Originally Posted by Kyle2k
Lol...it says 5.0L in the article but =P
Ohh, didnt relize that was the motor they were talking about. I thought the article was about another motor being built just for the mustang. Its kinda late. My bad!!
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 10:59 PM
  #5  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Nothing really new there, just Igor reporting what has been mentioned by (more than likely) multiple sources.
Reply
Old Feb 13, 2008 | 11:21 PM
  #6  
Wolfsburg's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: July 11, 2007
Posts: 1,499
Likes: 0
Welcome!


The article mentions that the 5.0 V8 headed for the GT will make "a respectable 400 – 425 horses, and similar torque...". Does this mean we can actually expect a 425HP Mustang GT?! I was thinking 325-350HP...

Btw, doesn't it boggle the mind a bit that Ford would bother naming an engine "BOSS" and then not have plans to put it in the Mustang?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 03:05 AM
  #7  
1trickpony's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 2, 2005
Posts: 607
Likes: 0
I think 80 HP a liter/400 HP is possible with VVT and DI. A lot of the luxury brands, Lexus, Cadillac, Audi are making similar power. I guess the only question is if Ford would put this motor in a GT or save it for a SE.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 09:59 AM
  #8  
Kyle2k's Avatar
Thread Starter
V6 Member
 
Joined: February 13, 2008
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
When you think of it, however, Lexus, BMW, etc, etc. Is getting there numbers from 4.0L this one is a 5.0L so although it is refined I think it takes advantage of keeping the displacement up, and the "suffistication" costs down.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 10:26 AM
  #9  
rhumb's Avatar
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
From: DMV
That would be sweet indeed. I like the higher tech alternative to the LS and Hemi motors. 80 ponies per liter is hardly stretching the specific output envelope at all these days and with 4 holes, VVT and DI, that should easily be doable all while maintaining decent emissions, economy and a broad power band. Back it up with a six speed and bring the ride/handling level up to contemporary standards with the long-dormant IRS and Ford could readily have a fully competitive GT against the Camaro and Challenger. Perhaps then too, the S-197 Mustang GT could finally credibly realize Ford's early proclamations of being a poor man's M3 rather than its current retreat into a narrow drag racer niche.

I imagine the Boss motor, while tagged for trailer hauling duty, would make a perfect Mach I motor and drag queen -- I'm presuming an OHC design and more emphasis on low-mid range power and torque than a back road screamer the 5.0 will likely be. But I imagine future CAFE and EPA standards will cause motors to trend towards smaller, higher efficiency designs rather than big-cube broad axes.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 10:33 AM
  #10  
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Kyle2k
When you think of it, however, Lexus, BMW, etc, etc. Is getting there numbers from 4.0L this one is a 5.0L so although it is refined I think it takes advantage of keeping the displacement up, and the "suffistication" costs down.
Yeah, doesn't Lexus have a 385hp 4.6L?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #11  
mjbarnet's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Iowa City
Originally Posted by SuperSugeKnight
Yeah, doesn't Lexus have a 385hp 4.6L?
even Hyundai has a 4.6L NA good for 375hp
http://www.hyundaigenesis.com/
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 01:55 PM
  #12  
rhumb's Avatar
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 2,980
Likes: 0
From: DMV
And more cutting edge naturally aspirated V8s are pushing even higher hp/l outputs:

Audi's 4.2 R motor putting out 420hp (1hp/l)
BMW's 4.0 M motor putting out 420hp (1.08hp/l)
Ferrari's 4.2 putting out nearly 500hp (119hp/l)

So yes, a 400/425hp 5.0 really is well within the realm of contemporary specific outputs. It would certainly be a highly-tuned sporting piece, but hardly on the bleeding edge.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 02:25 PM
  #13  
Thomas S's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: April 29, 2005
Posts: 2,133
Likes: 5
4 valves per cylinder will certainly help with the power output.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 02:26 PM
  #14  
gremlin190's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 7, 2007
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by rhumb
And more cutting edge naturally aspirated V8s are pushing even higher hp/l outputs:

Audi's 4.2 R motor putting out 420hp (1hp/l)
BMW's 4.0 M motor putting out 420hp (1.08hp/l)
Ferrari's 4.2 putting out nearly 500hp (119hp/l)

So yes, a 400/425hp 5.0 really is well within the realm of contemporary specific outputs. It would certainly be a highly-tuned sporting piece, but hardly on the bleeding edge.
Yes, but the torque on two of the 3 cars listed here are alot less than the claim of what Ford's 5.0 will be.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 05:11 PM
  #15  
SuperSugeKnight's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: March 29, 2007
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by gremlin190
Yes, but the torque on two of the 3 cars listed here are alot less than the claim of what Ford's 5.0 will be.
Very true, and you know Ford's factory tune will have some low end grunt.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 06:14 PM
  #16  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by mjbarnet
even Hyundai has a 4.6L NA good for 375hp
http://www.hyundaigenesis.com/
How come there's an asterisk next to the 375?

And notice it says "Peak horsepower" and fails to give a TQ rating.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 08:52 PM
  #17  
mjbarnet's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 3, 2005
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Iowa City
Originally Posted by V10
How come there's an asterisk next to the 375?

And notice it says "Peak horsepower" and fails to give a TQ rating.
the asterisk is rating with premium fuel, TQ is 333, this is down however from earlier reports of 400 HP and 350 TQ.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 11:04 PM
  #18  
bob's Avatar
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: May 16, 2004
Posts: 5,206
Likes: 18
From: Bristol, TN
Originally Posted by rhumb
I imagine the Boss motor, while tagged for trailer hauling duty, would make a perfect Mach I motor and drag queen -- I'm presuming an OHC design and more emphasis on low-mid range power and torque than a back road screamer the 5.0 will likely be. But I imagine future CAFE and EPA standards will cause motors to trend towards smaller, higher efficiency designs rather than big-cube broad axes.
Naw, that 400hp 5.0 would make a gem of a drag motor as well if properly backed by enough gears and cogged right (like say an M6 with a single overdrive rather than a double overdrive), pair that with a stick axle, a lighter 1 piece driveshaft and some final drive gears in the high 2s or low 3s and you'd have a nice effcient drivetrain as well (would certianly offset the penalty of a 6 gear trans).
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #19  
UnrealFord's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2004
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: United States
When and If this happens, its going to make our cars look extremly slow, especially guys like me that are bone stock still,,
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2008 | 06:39 AM
  #20  
GTJOHN's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: June 25, 2004
Posts: 1,076
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
Call me a pessimist, but I have to see it to believe it. Its rumored that the 2010 Mustang will be released in spring of 2009. Do you really think the engine will be ready for production by then?

400hp Mustang GT? I would be the happiest guy on this board, if true. I doubt it. Maybe 350hp with the new 5.0
I expect a SE Mustang to have 400hp.

I still think Ford is going to be slow, and we will see a version of the 315hp Bullitt engine in the 2010 Mustang GT.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:18 AM.