Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

Brenspeed's Stage 2 Power Pack - 72+ HP gains

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 8/30/10, 07:40 PM
  #21  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Driver72, where did you get the 20% correction to crank HP from?

I believe they use 15% and those are only estimates.
Old 8/30/10, 07:44 PM
  #22  
Mach 1 Member
 
Driver72's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 13, 2010
Location: Cal
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ltngdrvr
Driver72, where did you get the 20% correction to crank HP from?

I believe they use 15% and those are only estimates.
He wrote it in his description of how he got the 60 hp claim for the Stage 1 tune.
Somebody copied and pasted it in this thread too.
Old 8/30/10, 07:48 PM
  #23  
GTR Member
 
Ltngdrvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 18, 2010
Location: S.E. Texas
Posts: 4,990
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Okay, I see it now, yes, 20% is incorrect for a manual trans car.

Strange, I wonder if they missed that or just put it down wrong?
Old 8/30/10, 10:16 PM
  #24  
Bullitt Member
 
jeff s's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 4, 2010
Location: UAE
Posts: 226
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Looks like a great kit. I'm interested.

Still uses the stock pipes with resonators between the X and the mufflers?

Run this package at the track and post some numbers for the doubters. Remember the days before everyone had a chassis dyno?
Old 8/30/10, 10:50 PM
  #25  
Mach 1 Member
 
Driver72's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 13, 2010
Location: Cal
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jeff s
Looks like a great kit. I'm interested.

Still uses the stock pipes with resonators between the X and the mufflers?

Run this package at the track and post some numbers for the doubters. Remember the days before everyone had a chassis dyno?
Who is doubting? Only questions. Without them you don't get answers.
All he'd really have to do is simply post the dynos.
Old 8/31/10, 05:30 AM
  #26  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2006
Location: In Boredom
Posts: 15,818
Received 779 Likes on 568 Posts
some of these posts are entertaining to say the least.
Old 8/31/10, 05:30 AM
  #27  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
Originally Posted by Driver72
Are you a moderator or vendor here?
If so, I'd hope you'd know better. Otherwise maybe it's time to brush up on your 2011 5.0 knowledge.

So you're saying that simply by changing the fuel used in the car to a higher octane, you'll get more power, right? The computer in the car does nothing to help create this difference; the higher octane fuel just does it all by itself?
Old 8/31/10, 05:51 AM
  #28  
Mach 1 Member
 
Driver72's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 13, 2010
Location: Cal
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tom281
Wouldn't part of the gain that is achieved be measured from the tune that is supplied, which if you're looking for performance would include a change from base octane to 91 or even 93? Changing the fuel you put in the car isn't going to give you more power; changing the tune for the octane that you use is what gives you the increase. Tuners sell tunes, not fuel.
Originally Posted by tom281
So you're saying that simply by changing the fuel used in the car to a higher octane, you'll get more power, right? The computer in the car does nothing to help create this difference; the higher octane fuel just does it all by itself?
No what I'm saying is your top comment is completely wrong, and your second comment is clearly an attempt to cover your inaccurate first comment.

Putting in higher octane gas in the car, with NO tune, does in fact give the car more power. You do not need to "change the tune" as you stated to get that increase.
You don't even need to have a tune. The car's stock ECU will allow more timing and less knock retard for more power. Again, no tune needed.
So yes, in fact, changing just the octane gas used in the stock car does give you more power.
Oh and also, many tuners do also sell fuel (often of the race variety).

Last edited by Driver72; 8/31/10 at 05:52 AM.
Old 8/31/10, 06:15 AM
  #29  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
That was exactly my point; that by changing fuel you're essentially changing the tune as well because the computer adjusts certain parameters.

You've proven what I was saying, which is the tuning is what gives you the additional power, no matter if it is the computer changing it automatically or the end user uploading an aftermarket tune to the car. It is not simply the fuel, but rather the reactions from the altered computer tuning.

You've proven my point and confirmed what I was saying earlier; that said, I don't appreciate you questioning my integrety by saying my posts are inaccurate and some kind of attempt to cover up inaccurate statements.

Oh to answer your question, yes I am a moderator here and part of my job is to keep threads in-line and on topic. You've now made several posts arguing your point, which is your view and your opinion. Vendors can chose to advertise however they wish; if Brenspeed or anyone wants to quote flywheel hp (like Ford, Saleen, Roush, etc) or RWHP numbers, it is their decision. As a potential purchaser, ask the questions and know what you're buying. That is what makes forums like this a good one, let's just not turn it into a vendor bashing session.
Old 8/31/10, 07:14 AM
  #30  
Mach 1 Member
 
Driver72's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 13, 2010
Location: Cal
Posts: 517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Tom, my point was you said changing the fuel (octane) you put in the car is not going to give you more power, changing the tune will.
You don't change the tune to give you more power when you change octane.
The computer does it, you are not "tuning" anything. Further, you can not change the tune (even if you add a tuner) without changing to the higher octane fuel. So it IS the fuel that gives you more power.
I don't think there is a tuner out there that can/will extract much if any more power out of a stock car if it's running 87 octane.

Sure they MAY be able to get 2-3 rwhp more by advancing timing a tiny bit, but at the risk of detonation.

You might of just explained yourself incorrectly, but you aren't getting the additional 10-12 hp from going from 87 octane to 91-93 by changing the tune, you are doing so by changing the fuel with the higher octane.

Yes, vendors CAN choose to advertise however they wish, I'm not disputing that. But remember there are laws against false advertising. But customers can also question the validity of those advertisements and claims. And there are no laws that don't allow that.
That's what keeps businesses in line and (hopefully) honest, when those questions lead to more questions which if a business is falsely or wrongfully representing their product then becomes known to the customer base who will then not purchase a product from a dishonest company or vendor who is misrepresenting their product or claim.
Brenspeed is free to make their claims, and in doing so, if they want to wrongfully use a 20% drivetrain loss by ADDING 20% based on their dyno numbers, they can do that. But we can also bring that fact to light to make the customer more enlightened. And that's what really matters.
So look at my several posts as a "buyer beware" and a customer enlightening/protecting proposition.

PLEASE KEEP KEEP THE THREAD ON TOPIC.

Last edited by tom281; 8/31/10 at 08:12 AM.
Old 8/31/10, 08:00 AM
  #31  
Mach 1 Member
 
pony racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 21, 2010
Location: Bridgeport, Ct
Posts: 724
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Old 8/31/10, 08:33 AM
  #32  
Needs to be more Astony
 
Knight's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 4, 2004
Location: Volo, IL
Posts: 8,609
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
just my 2 cents. it doesn't matter what they say for hp gain, they told the actual rwhp gain so that is 100% accurate even if true drivetrain loss is around 12%.

If you want, just use the rwhp they gave and use 12% to see what they offer and buy it or not.
Old 9/1/10, 01:04 PM
  #33  
Bullitt Member
Thread Starter
 
BRENSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 4, 2005
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
From our dyno graphs it clearly states stock showroom floor to our Stage 2 Power package. Our car made 354 rwhp completely stock (87 octane). After our Stage 1 package; Steeda CAI, SCT X3 (93 Octane), and Axlebacks, our car laid down 393 rwhp. From there, we added our Kooks header package (our Stage 2 package) and the car laid down 417 rwhp. Take the 15% drivetrain loss for a manual (20% for an auto) and our Stage 2 package is a 74 Crank horsepower gain or 63 RWHP gains from factory show room condition to our Stage 2 package. ((417/0.85)-(354/0.85)) = 74.

Our dyno graphs are clearly labeled with starting mods to current mods. How is this false advertising. I doubt we got this point false advertising for the last 5 years.

Stock vs Steeda CAI and tune (Stage 1 - mufflers)
http://www.brenspeed.com/3000gt11steeda.html

Stage 1 vs Stage 2:
http://www.brenspeed.com/2011kooks.html
Old 9/1/10, 01:37 PM
  #34  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2008
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
My auto car is making way more than 330rwhp. 20% drivetrain loss. So i must have a factory freak baby!
Old 9/1/10, 01:50 PM
  #35  
Cobra Member
 
todd03blown's Avatar
 
Join Date: November 30, 2009
Location: South
Posts: 1,121
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BRENSPEED
From our dyno graphs it clearly states stock showroom floor to our Stage 2 Power package. Our car made 354 rwhp completely stock (87 octane). After our Stage 1 package; Steeda CAI, SCT X3 (93 Octane), and Axlebacks, our car laid down 393 rwhp. From there, we added our Kooks header package (our Stage 2 package) and the car laid down 417 rwhp. Take the 15% drivetrain loss for a manual (20% for an auto) and our Stage 2 package is a 74 Crank horsepower gain or 63 RWHP gains from factory show room condition to our Stage 2 package. ((417/0.85)-(354/0.85)) = 74.

Our dyno graphs are clearly labeled with starting mods to current mods. How is this false advertising. I doubt we got this point false advertising for the last 5 years.

Stock vs Steeda CAI and tune (Stage 1 - mufflers)
http://www.brenspeed.com/3000gt11steeda.html

Stage 1 vs Stage 2:
http://www.brenspeed.com/2011kooks.html
Nice post; thanks for the information!
Old 9/1/10, 04:20 PM
  #36  
GT Member
 
fossy207's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 15, 2010
Location: Toronto
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BRENSPEED
From our dyno graphs it clearly states stock showroom floor to our Stage 2 Power package. Our car made 354 rwhp completely stock (87 octane). After our Stage 1 package; Steeda CAI, SCT X3 (93 Octane), and Axlebacks, our car laid down 393 rwhp. From there, we added our Kooks header package (our Stage 2 package) and the car laid down 417 rwhp. Take the 15% drivetrain loss for a manual (20% for an auto) and our Stage 2 package is a 74 Crank horsepower gain or 63 RWHP gains from factory show room condition to our Stage 2 package. ((417/0.85)-(354/0.85)) = 74.

Our dyno graphs are clearly labeled with starting mods to current mods. How is this false advertising. I doubt we got this point false advertising for the last 5 years.

Stock vs Steeda CAI and tune (Stage 1 - mufflers)
http://www.brenspeed.com/3000gt11steeda.html

Stage 1 vs Stage 2:
http://www.brenspeed.com/2011kooks.html

Here's my $0.02. The following link is the page on your website with the pricing, ordering instructions and details of your 60hp+ Power Pack:
http://www.brenspeed.com/coyotestage1a.html

Most of your buyers will not see this thread before making a purchase decision. Most will make a decision based on the above web page. My problem is this...your website description does not make mention of 87 vs 91 octane, stock show room floor (btw does every dealer give you the car with just 87 octane or just yours?) vs 91 Octane, nor does it show a dyno graph with any details.

Based on this argument, can you now understand how a potential buyer would make an ill informed decision because you've omitted some very important details in the product description?
Old 9/1/10, 04:58 PM
  #37  
V6 Member
 
jay45dee's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 1, 2010
Location: KC, MO
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts


My car had 91 octane in it from the dealer...

jusss sayin..



I just wish they would compare apples to apples.
Advertise what your dyno read stock on 91, then with your mods on 91.
All this BS would be avoided.

Last edited by jay45dee; 9/1/10 at 05:00 PM.
Old 9/2/10, 04:16 AM
  #38  
Legacy TMS Member
 
tom281's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 8, 2005
Location: Medina county, OH
Posts: 12,397
Received 29 Likes on 22 Posts
I've cleaned up this thread in order to keep it ON TOPIC. Anyone who wants to keep arguing or pushing their own OPINIONS as FACTS can take it to PMs.
Old 9/2/10, 04:47 AM
  #39  
28.
Bullitt Member
 
28.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: June 2, 2010
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 70MACH1OWNER
Aaah...that is not Brenspeed's style unless these new motors are not up to stuff........... I was at Brenspeed's last week for other reason's and asked Brent about supercharging the new 5.0. In a nut shell they have the same rwhp limit as the 3V engine because while Ford gave them good piston's they still gave them a cast crank and powdered metal rods.

Are you sure this is what they told you? New 5.0 has a forged crank last time I looked that up..

Oh, and I was with the guy when he filled up my car with 91. I'm sure this isn't always the case but I have to agree with some of the previous posters that the numbers are misleading since your trial run was done with 87 octane.

Last edited by tom281; 9/2/10 at 05:32 AM.
Old 9/2/10, 05:15 AM
  #40  
Legacy TMS Member
 
Glenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 7, 2006
Location: In Boredom
Posts: 15,818
Received 779 Likes on 568 Posts
but he started out with one hp rating and ended up with 70+ more hp than he started with.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RCooke08GT
2005-2009 Mustang
9
2/19/17 03:03 AM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
10/2/15 01:00 PM
GeoWett
GT
3
9/30/15 06:40 AM
RoushRS3
2010-2014 Mustang
7
9/29/15 08:03 PM



Quick Reply: Brenspeed's Stage 2 Power Pack - 72+ HP gains



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 AM.