2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

Bolt on GT VS new five ohhh

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 07:37 PM
  #1  
chrisheltra's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: June 15, 2010
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Bolt on GT VS new five ohhh

Originally Posted by DolSVT00
Run1 (Yes I can't shift, Yes I missed a gear)

Run2 (I'm certain that five ohhh would have run me down if we kept going, those 4v heads pull wayyy harder up top than the wife's 2v)
Enjoy

YouTube- run1 Bolt on GT VS 2011 mustang GT

YouTube- run2 Bolt on GT VS 2011 mustang GT
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 07:39 PM
  #2  
GRABOID's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 15, 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
....Missing .....list of bolt ons
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 07:42 PM
  #3  
chrisheltra's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: June 15, 2010
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by GRABOID
....Missing .....list of bolt ons
I sent my friend a PM to find out will post in a few minutes.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 07:56 PM
  #4  
chrisheltra's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: June 15, 2010
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Everything but another motor and nitrous.

Ported plennum, Intake, full exhaust (headers included), gears, shifter, custom tune, underdrives, throttle body blablabla.

Last edited by chrisheltra; Jun 16, 2010 at 08:07 PM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 08:48 PM
  #5  
MadMoose's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 20, 2008
Posts: 325
Likes: 0
From: Highlands Ranch, CO
no cams heads or FI?
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 08:53 PM
  #6  
chrisheltra's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: June 15, 2010
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by MadMoose
no cams heads or FI?
No sir
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 09:16 PM
  #7  
krnpimpsta's Avatar
 
Joined: May 31, 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC Metro Area
wow, nice
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 09:26 PM
  #8  
csledd's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 23, 2010
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Paducah, KY
pretty sure missing that gear didn't help, but I think the 5.0 could have pulled harder
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 09:32 PM
  #9  
GRABOID's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: May 15, 2010
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: Arkansas
Originally Posted by csledd
pretty sure missing that gear didn't help, but I think the 5.0 could have pulled harder
I was thinking the same. But, you have to figure passenger and car weights as a bit.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 10:03 PM
  #10  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by csledd
pretty sure missing that gear didn't help, but I think the 5.0 could have pulled harder
nice picture christie
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 10:39 PM
  #11  
Fazm's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: September 21, 2004
Posts: 1,664
Likes: 0
+1 on thinkin the 5.0 should have pulled harder
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2010 | 11:07 PM
  #12  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 05:27 AM
  #13  
MRGTX's Avatar
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2010
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 15
From: CT
Should have pulled harder??! How do you figure?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 05:44 AM
  #14  
chrisheltra's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: June 15, 2010
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
The 2v is modded pretty good. I had a 250-300# passenger with less than 400 miles on the car and 87 in the tank from the dealer. I also haven't driven a manual in nearly 7 years. I definitely wasn't running under ideal conditions. So Id say the 4v did pretty well for now but gotta give props to my friend in the 2v.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 05:49 AM
  #15  
csledd's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 23, 2010
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Paducah, KY
Originally Posted by chrisheltra
The 2v is modded pretty good. I had a 250-300# passenger with less than 400 miles on the car and 87 in the tank from the dealer. I also haven't driven a manual in nearly 7 years. I definitely wasn't running under ideal conditions. So Id say the 4v did pretty well for now but gotta give props to my friend in the 2v.
Well the explains some... since there's a pretty big difference between break in horsepower. 87 is gross!
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 07:24 AM
  #16  
28.'s Avatar
28.
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: June 2, 2010
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Run'em from a dig..
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 07:28 AM
  #17  
chrisheltra's Avatar
Thread Starter
GT Member
 
Joined: June 15, 2010
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Originally Posted by 28.
Run'em from a dig..
That would be murder....
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 07:42 AM
  #18  
Mustang05's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 30, 2004
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
that 5.0 would destroy the 2valve if someone was even a decent driver. just being honest. the 5.0 makes about 370 the wheels stock.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 07:45 AM
  #19  
WaltM's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: August 9, 2007
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Philadelphia
I'm impressed at the performance of the 2v as well...
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2010 | 08:20 AM
  #20  
csledd's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 23, 2010
Posts: 572
Likes: 0
From: Paducah, KY
Originally Posted by WaltM
I'm impressed at the performance of the 2v as well...
Kind of makes me wish I still have my 2v around when I get the 5.0
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
FromZto5
2010-2014 Mustang
61
Sep 30, 2015 05:28 AM
Stephen Laslo
V6
4
Sep 18, 2015 07:57 PM
jim010
2010-2014 Mustang
1
Sep 14, 2015 10:15 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:04 AM.