2013 looks

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 16, 2012 | 12:59 PM

#21

~~11SHELBYGT500~~

Banned

Joined: March 9, 2011

Posts: 16,242

Likes: 6

Quote:

Originally Posted by n4agoodtyme

Everyday in the garage

This one is 100% better than the GT but it would be near perfect with the 10/11 plate opening and no blackout plate

May 16, 2012 | 01:18 PM

#22

rick0202

Thread Starter

V6 Member

Joined: September 8, 2009

Posts: 72

Likes: 1

From: chicago

I was confused by the fog lights. **** the MCA looks good. And the Cali special too.

May 16, 2012 | 05:57 PM

#23

going for broke

Mach 1 Member

Joined: March 20, 2011

Posts: 869

Likes: 0

From: Bremen, Indiana

Quote:

Originally Posted by 11SHELBYGT500

This one is 100% better than the GT but it would be near perfect with the 10/11 plate opening and no blackout plate

well thats the same rear end I stare at everyday (cs) so maybe thats why I'm liking the 13 rear end. I don't care for the front of the car as much as the 10-12 but I feel the improvement on my particular model is good.

I thought about the blackout plate being body color and ironically when my car came off of the carrier it had plastic covering the blackout panel and it looked horrible. It was white just like my car. The blackout panel completes the look for me but It only really appeals to me on the lighter colors.. pw, ghig, is, etc..

May 17, 2012 | 06:22 AM

#24

stevegt2012

V6 Member

Joined: April 4, 2012

Posts: 67

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally Posted by 11SHELBYGT500

It's terrible, especially on the GT. It's fat, a giant hole is cut into the bumper cover, added more reflectors, black out panel, the tail lights are the only decent thing about it.

I agree. Too ricey looking. I do like the tail lights though.