Notices
2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By:

2011 Top speed guesses

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/2/10, 12:40 PM
  #21  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would be psychotic to attempt speeds even close to those numbers in a factory Mustang regardless of HP. The suspension isn't up to the task either.
Old 1/2/10, 01:05 PM
  #22  
Cobra R Member
 
Adam's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 12, 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I live in Orange County. As long as it can reach 90mph I'm happy.
Old 1/2/10, 01:07 PM
  #23  
Mach 1 Member
 
mustangmaniak2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 17, 2009
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Note this is the v6
Old 1/2/10, 01:15 PM
  #24  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mustangmaniak2010
Note this is the v6
What the speedo goes up to means nothing.



Note this is a GT500, I guess it can only do 160?

Our G8 GT speedo goes to 180 and there is NO WAY that car can hit that speed.

Last edited by eci; 1/2/10 at 01:16 PM.
Old 1/2/10, 01:28 PM
  #25  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I think the GT is going to eclipse 165mph pretty easily sans a limiter that stops the fun short, and frankly, that is way more than enough. That said, the suspensions capabilities wouldn't worry me at those speeds nearly as much as aerodynamic instability would.
Old 1/2/10, 01:32 PM
  #26  
eci
Banned
 
eci's Avatar
 
Join Date: August 16, 2006
Posts: 1,633
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
165 is crazy fast in any car on the street and retarded. Those speeds are for the track only.
Old 1/2/10, 01:57 PM
  #27  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
You won't catch ME trying to reach the limit....

Funny how some people look at the speedo and quote it as what the car can do.
I always got a laugh outta that
Old 1/2/10, 01:58 PM
  #28  
I Have No Life
 
Boomer's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 10,445
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Originally Posted by mustangmaniak2010
Note this is the v6
Also note the GT has a 7k redline....
So they can use the same parts
Old 1/2/10, 04:23 PM
  #29  
V6 Member
 
SpOnkey21's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 18, 2009
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am guessing the aerodynamics will be better than a fox convertible, and even the v6 has way more power than that. The V6 will easily be capable of 155 and 165 is a conservative guess; and I am supremely confident the GT could do at least 170 without the governor. My fox convertible had stock rims and standard off the rack tires with stock suspension and it could have gone to 155. You can debate safety, but I am sure the new GT can do it, 175 isn't a stretch either. I suppose 185 is a high guess, but not by much in my opinion.
Old 1/3/10, 05:47 PM
  #30  
Mach 1 Member
 
Dave07997S's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 23, 2008
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can think of only a handful of car companies that don't restrict their topspeed of thier vehicles. I know Porsche doesn't as well as Ferrari as they are all rpm/drag limited. My 997S will hit 7200rpm in 6th gear (redline) and it would equate to 185mph. The 2011 GT was able to hit redline in 5th ger (1:1) this would equate to 171mph...I think this is very attainable.

Dave
Old 1/3/10, 06:05 PM
  #31  
Mach 1 Member
 
GT40 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Id say 175 for the GT, and 160 for the V6.
Old 1/3/10, 08:12 PM
  #32  
 
06GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 29, 2005
Posts: 4,618
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Who cares, you'll hardly ever get the chance to hit that type of speed outside of a track or without going to jail.

That being said, if it's "limited" to 155mph, that will be enough to protect the Mustang's rep in the E-Peen contests.

I'd rather have some more rear gear like a 3.73 for added acceleration, losing some top speed is not an issue.
Old 1/3/10, 08:25 PM
  #33  
Bullitt Member
 
rodriguez256's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 28, 2007
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My 01 Monte carlo SS had a speedometer of 140 but I got it up to an est. 150.
Old 1/8/10, 09:41 AM
  #34  
FR500 Member
 
PTRocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 1, 2008
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 3,336
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
These are 'optional' tire specs I have found for some of the cars.

V6 235/50/R18 97W

GT/CS 245/45/R19 98W
GT w Brembo package 255/40/R19 Summer Tire, later 245/40/R19 Z Rated Tire
GT 245/45/R19 98W
Old 1/8/10, 09:52 AM
  #35  
Mach 1 Member
 
Dixie_Flatline's Avatar
 
Join Date: December 16, 2007
Location: West Chicago
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Remind me to stay off whatever roads you guys are travelling.
Old 1/8/10, 10:59 AM
  #36  
Bullitt Member
 
Cusp's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 8, 2009
Location: Santa Barbara, California
Posts: 282
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by eci
They will be drag as well as power limited before they hit the "redline in 6th" speed. The 505HP 3100 lb Z06 can't even hit redline in top gear stock. 412HP and the Mustangs aero isn't enough to reach 185.
It makes its top speed of 207 in 5th not 6th.

Its quite a study to estimate that the speed actually will be. You have the drag coefficent and that inverse square law. You need a lot more power to go a little faster at high speeds. If you could go 140 with 300 HP, you could go 165 with 400.
Old 1/9/10, 03:47 PM
  #37  
GT Member
 
AWESOMO 4000's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 15, 2007
Posts: 103
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the 4100lbs SRT8 Challenger can hit 173mph, I'm pretty sure the GT will be able to match that, considering it's toting around 500lbs less flab with equally heinous aerodynamics and frontal area.
Old 1/9/10, 09:58 PM
  #38  
Cobra Member
Thread Starter
 
RandyW's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 23, 2009
Location: NW Minnesota
Posts: 1,312
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by AWESOMO 4000
If the 4100lbs SRT8 Challenger can hit 173mph, I'm pretty sure the GT will be able to match that, considering it's toting around 500lbs less flab with equally heinous aerodynamics and frontal area.
Just how heinous are the aerodynamics? I don't recall every reading what the coefficient of drag is for either car.
Old 1/11/10, 02:55 PM
  #39  
bob
Legacy TMS Member
 
bob's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 16, 2004
Location: Bristol, TN
Posts: 5,197
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by AWESOMO 4000
If the 4100lbs SRT8 Challenger can hit 173mph, I'm pretty sure the GT will be able to match that, considering it's toting around 500lbs less flab with equally heinous aerodynamics and frontal area.
Weight has nothing to do with top speed unless you have to get there in a certain amount of time, anyways I'm just throwing out that the 07-09 GT500's with 500hp on tap could barely crest the 160 mph mark (163 or so ungoverned IIRC).

While I'm positive neither V6 or V8 will go faster than 155 in stock trim, I'm betting a GT flat out wont go much past that anyway even with the areodynamic improvements put into place with the '10 models.

Last edited by bob; 1/11/10 at 02:56 PM.
Old 1/11/10, 04:08 PM
  #40  
Legacy TMS Member
 
laserred38's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 6, 2006
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 14,047
Received 166 Likes on 141 Posts
I like how Ford swapped the tach over to the right on the 2010+ cars, like the 07-09 GT500 SVT cluster. Driving an 09 and 10 back to back, I prefer it on the right. More visible in the corner of your eye.


Quick Reply: 2011 Top speed guesses



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:37 AM.