2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

2011 Mustang Price List NOW AVAILABLE!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 05:01 PM
  #261  
ttgt500's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: January 20, 2010
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
You guys are nuts to spend $40k on a Mustang GT. No offense!
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 07:31 PM
  #262  
i3arracuda's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: February 4, 2008
Posts: 105
Likes: 0
From: Roxboro, NC
Originally Posted by ttgt500
You guys are nuts to spend $40k on a Mustang GT. No offense!
It's all relative, I'm afraid. Even a value meal costs about 16-20% more today than it did 6 or 7 years ago.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2010 | 08:03 PM
  #263  
RickyD's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: November 3, 2004
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
From: QC, Canada
Originally Posted by ttgt500
You guys are nuts to spend $40k on a Mustang GT. No offense!
Wathever suits your needs is fine for YOU... but remember, we only live once !!
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 08:10 AM
  #264  
objoe's Avatar
GT Member
 
Joined: January 13, 2010
Posts: 184
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by ttgt500
You guys are nuts to spend $40k on a Mustang GT. No offense!
How about $40K for a Mustang GT Premium convertible with options?
It's a lot of money either way but I haven't bought a new car just for me since 1981. I'm driving a 1999 E-150 with 171K miles. (I do however get on my Harley in the summers)
I can fit in the new Mustang better than any of the other cars I looked at, I've owned umpteen Ford vehicles over the years, and plan on keeping this car until my sons' fight over their inheritance. LOL
I am at a point where I can afford it even though I do cringe a bit when I think I could get a V6 coupe and a Focus for the same price.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 08:15 AM
  #265  
Overboost's Avatar
GTR Member
 
Joined: September 28, 2009
Posts: 6,284
Likes: 1
I don't understand the problem here...it's not like the Mustang is sticking out at $40k, since the Camaro, Challenger, and 370Z can all quickly add up to the same. Yeah, it seems like a lot of money, especially when you compare that to older Mustangs from years ago, but there's a lot more there. More materials, more safety features, and more gadgets that are all added in from say, a 2000 GT.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 03:41 PM
  #266  
CHPMustang's Avatar
V6 Member
 
Joined: December 17, 2009
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
From: NorCal
Originally Posted by ttgt500
You guys are nuts to spend $40k on a Mustang GT. No offense!
You must not have been around long pal. I remember these kinds of comments when Mustangs broke the $20k price threshold...and then the $30k mark.

Candy bars don't cost a nickel anymore either.
Reply
Old Jan 28, 2010 | 05:03 PM
  #267  
05fordgt's Avatar
Thread Starter
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: June 19, 2004
Posts: 6,840
Likes: 2
From: Phoenixville, PA
Originally Posted by CHPMustang

Candy bars don't cost a nickel anymore either.
You got that right. 7-11 sells regular sized candy bars for $1.05 now. And with a little looking, the candy bar is actually smaller than in the past.

Moral of the story, prices increase. Nothing that can be done about it.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 10:21 AM
  #268  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
A nickel!
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 02:15 PM
  #269  
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: November 14, 2007
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 8
From: Pacific NW USA
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
A nickel!
I remember "penny candy" when I was a kid. Phone calls at a phone booth were 10 cents. Postage stamps were 13 cents. et Cetera.

I bought my first brand new Mustang for $9,300. It was a 1988 LX Hatchback (2.3L / Manual). Talk about sticker shock when I bought a brand new 1989 Mustang LX 5.0L Sport a year later for $15,750 (very well equipped). Paid over $20K for a brand new 2000 Mustang GT Coupe. Paid $23K for a brand new 2003 Mach 1. Paid $26K for my 2007 Mustang GT. Prices continue to climb; sure wish my income would follow suit!
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2010 | 02:29 PM
  #270  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Five Oh Brian
I remember "penny candy" when I was a kid. Phone calls at a phone booth were 10 cents. Postage stamps were 13 cents. et Cetera.

I bought my first brand new Mustang for $9,300. It was a 1988 LX Hatchback (2.3L / Manual). Talk about sticker shock when I bought a brand new 1989 Mustang LX 5.0L Sport a year later for $15,750 (very well equipped). Paid over $20K for a brand new 2000 Mustang GT Coupe. Paid $23K for a brand new 2003 Mach 1. Paid $26K for my 2007 Mustang GT. Prices continue to climb; sure wish my income would follow suit!
That was a joke from a Seinfeld episode, which ironically was about a car dealership.

But I hear ya Brian, prices are climbin!
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 11:02 AM
  #271  
dragstart's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: January 31, 2010
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
From: cleveland ohio
Question................are Ford stock holders x-plan qualified? If so, any minimum number of shares, etc.?


Oh, poop. As soon as I x'd out of this, I saw the x-plan stockholders sticky. Nevermind.

BTW... I remember wanting a Boss 302 back in 1970, but finally thought $4000 was too much to pay. Regreted it ever since. Now, a 2011 like I want is 10 times that. But I make way more than 10 times what I did then. No regrets this time.

Last edited by dragstart; Jan 31, 2010 at 11:31 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 07:25 PM
  #272  
montreal ponies's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by dragstart
Question................are Ford stock holders x-plan qualified? If so, any minimum number of shares, etc.?


Oh, poop. As soon as I x'd out of this, I saw the x-plan stockholders sticky. Nevermind.

BTW... I remember wanting a Boss 302 back in 1970, but finally thought $4000 was too much to pay. Regreted it ever since. Now, a 2011 like I want is 10 times that. But I make way more than 10 times what I did then. No regrets this time.
X-Plan : minimum of 100 Ford shares, must be kept for at least 6 months to get PIN number.

Last edited by montreal ponies; Jan 31, 2010 at 07:52 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 07:28 PM
  #273  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
I thought the min was 100 shares montreal?
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 07:33 PM
  #274  
montreal ponies's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
That was a joke from a Seinfeld episode, which ironically was about a car dealership.

But I hear ya Brian, prices are climbin!
That just reminds me when i bought my first 'Stang, it was after i did the grocery with my girlfriend, we decided to cross the boulevard and go check out the 5.0's at that big Ford dealership and came back out with a signed sales slip that said:
1991 Ford Mustang black coupe LX 5.0, price ( and still priceless) : $16000 CDN "SOLD"
Never slept that night, wonder why !
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 07:46 PM
  #275  
montreal ponies's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 3,738
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
Originally Posted by stangfoeva
I thought the min was 100 shares montreal?
It is actually 100 shares, you were right just checked the x-plan thread. So right now 100x $10.90= $1090 should still go up, hopefully.

Last edited by montreal ponies; Jan 31, 2010 at 07:54 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 08:26 PM
  #276  
stangfoeva's Avatar
MOTM Committee Member
 
Joined: April 17, 2006
Posts: 9,201
Likes: 2
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by montreal ponies
It is actually 100 shares, you were right just checked the x-plan thread. So right now 100x $10.90= $1090 should still go up, hopefully.
Sweet
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2010 | 08:49 PM
  #277  
LIPony's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: October 12, 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by montreal ponies
It is actually 100 shares, you were right just checked the x-plan thread. So right now 100x $10.90= $1090 should still go up, hopefully.

I hope it does. I want to use the money I made for a downpayment on the 11 GT(I bought it when it was around 2)
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 04:30 PM
  #278  
assasinator's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: December 24, 2009
Posts: 457
Likes: 1
the 305bhp V6 is going to be a performance disapointment just like the 305bhp 350Z/G35.....oh wait the 350X and g35 arent performance disapointments at all.


Oh , and the 3.7 nissan v6's dont respond to performance upgrades at all......oh wait, they DO respond.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 07:48 PM
  #279  
whysoserious's Avatar
Bullitt Member
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 350
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by assasinator
the 305bhp V6 is going to be a performance disapointment just like the 305bhp 350Z/G35.....oh wait the 350X and g35 arent performance disapointments at all.


Oh , and the 3.7 nissan v6's dont respond to performance upgrades at all......oh wait, they DO respond.
Yeah I'm very much looking forward to test drives from magazines, etc on the V6. Personally I think it's going to wipe the floor with the base Camaro and Challenger. Can't wait.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2010 | 08:01 PM
  #280  
Five Oh Brian's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: November 14, 2007
Posts: 3,651
Likes: 8
From: Pacific NW USA
Originally Posted by whysoserious
Yeah I'm very much looking forward to test drives from magazines, etc on the V6. Personally I think it's going to wipe the floor with the base Camaro and Challenger. Can't wait.
I just noticed in this month's Car and Driver magazine that they're estimating the '11 V6 will run the 1/4 mile in 13.6... I personally think it'll be about 14 flat at just about 100 mph.
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:47 PM.