You know you guys hammering as to why they did what they did with the rear of the car are very tiring..I know exactly WHY they did it and IMO it's a failure. I'm glad you all passed visual perception 101 this year now put away the text books and your "The Mustang is the greatest thing evah" banner and step into reality.

As for the ferrari, they do not have that black for apprence sake it is there as a functional areodynamic componant to the car. They use is for for function before form.

If you can't seperate the difference of the apperance vs size then any credibility you may have had on this conversation just went out the door.

A photo of a car sitting in a blank space in No way shape or form give you any indication of it's size as proven by the simple fact that everyone was sooooo shocked about the size of the Chally. When anyone with half a brain and one once of deductive reasoning may have noticed it was designed off a LARGE platform.

And as saying the chally was copied and NOT designed...just get a grip on reality.

And as to those people that may not be design savy but still don't like the rear of that thing, telling them WHY it's like that wont change the fact that for them it's crap.

If my tone is short ..well such is life..I've been around this design block way to many times to have everyone who thinks they know trying to explain the text book reasons ford did what they did... I know the reasons. I just think they failed.