2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

2010 Compared to 1969-70's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/21/08, 03:14 PM
  #21  
MBK
Mach 1 Member
 
MBK's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow, the camaro... don't like it
Old 11/21/08, 03:18 PM
  #22  
Legacy TMS Member
 
unnoticedtrails's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 27, 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,450
Received 57 Likes on 46 Posts
sweet comparo!!
Old 11/21/08, 03:18 PM
  #23  
Shelby GT350 Member
 
RedCandy5.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: June 9, 2008
Location: Rochester NY
Posts: 2,061
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Challenger has the only rear of the 3 that looks good!
Old 11/21/08, 03:47 PM
  #24  
Cobra Member
 
topbliss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 14, 2008
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,140
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
The more I look at the 2010, the more I like the S197's. THe 10's are too "Camaro like" for my taste. Yuk. Even steven is dead on....
Old 11/21/08, 04:02 PM
  #25  
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
 
TampaBear67's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,725
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fixmejesus
Man, there all copying the Celica.
GOD HELP THIS POOR BLIND CHILD.

You Wanna Talk About An UGLY A$$! I'll Take the Stang Any Day Over This Mess!


Last edited by TampaBear67; 11/21/08 at 04:03 PM.
Old 11/21/08, 04:06 PM
  #26  
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
 
TampaBear67's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,725
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by fixmejesus
Man, there all copying the Celica.

Tell Me ONE THING HelpMeJesus, How Old Are You?

How In The Hell is the Mustang copying the Celica, When The Mustang Was Around Long Before There Even Was a Celica?

Last edited by TampaBear67; 11/21/08 at 10:40 PM. Reason: Accidently Posted Wrong Users Name.
Old 11/21/08, 04:10 PM
  #27  
MBK
Mach 1 Member
 
MBK's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 31, 2008
Posts: 603
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
wow, i didn't realize what the camaro rear end looked like until you posted that comparison
Old 11/21/08, 04:14 PM
  #28  
V6 Member
 
Cooper424's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 9, 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TampaBear67
Tell Me ONE THING Steven, How Old Are You?

How In The Hell is the Mustang copying the Celica, When The Mustang Was Around Long Before There Even Was a Celica?
yo! exactly! fixmejesus that looks absolutley nothing like a celica of any type, you've got to be f***** blind. honestly, it might be better to take that argument to Camaro5.com and let them have it. if there was EVER any resemblence, theirs is closer..

your crazy dude.
Old 11/21/08, 04:37 PM
  #29  
Mach 1 Member
 
zzcoop's Avatar
 
Join Date: September 22, 2005
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know how hard it was to find a straight-on shot of the rear of the production version of the Camaro? It's like they're too embarrassed to photograph it or something...
Old 11/21/08, 04:59 PM
  #30  
Legacy TMS Member
 
unnoticedtrails's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 27, 2004
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,450
Received 57 Likes on 46 Posts
Originally Posted by TampaBear67
GOD HELP THIS POOR BLIND CHILD.

You Wanna Talk About An UGLY A$$! I'll Take the Stang Any Day Over This Mess!

yeeesh the Camaro is really ugly compared to the 2010 stang
Old 11/21/08, 09:04 PM
  #31  
SUPERCHARGED RED ROCKET ------------------Master-Moderator
 
m05fastbackGT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 11, 2006
Location: Carnegie, PA
Posts: 10,289
Received 2,227 Likes on 1,780 Posts
FYI, the 2010 neither looks like the 67-68, nor 69-70. If anything, the 05-09 and 2010 look more like the 65-66 fastback. As the greenhouse on both the 65-66, and 05-09's, clearly do not have full fastback rooflines. Where as both the 67-68, and 69-70 models, clearly do have full fastback profiles !
Old 11/21/08, 09:09 PM
  #32  
Banned
 
Even Steven's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zzcoop
Even retro design can look dated. It's all about how it's carried out.

The Mustang II was the first real attempt at returning the Mustang to its roots by emulating specific design details of the original Mustang, therefore making it a "retro" design. Are you telling me it doesn't look dated?

The Mustang II wasn't a retro design theme at the time it was introduced. Not in the slightest. BTW, the retro craze that started with cars like the VW New Beetle and PT Cruiser didn't start anywhere near the time of the Mustang II. Retro car design wasn't even thought of back then... so it's funny to suggest that the Mustang II designer's were going for a retro look.
Old 11/21/08, 09:13 PM
  #33  
Banned
 
Even Steven's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MBK
the 05 looks more like the classic cars in those shots
Exactly. And the funny thing is that he seems to go to great lengths to find cars in similar angles and similar colors when he's posting comparison shots of the 2010 model. Of course he chose a silver '09, which isn't exactly a showcase color that really shows off the car.

If you're going to do it, then don't be so obviously biased, TampaBear.
Old 11/21/08, 09:14 PM
  #34  
Banned
 
Even Steven's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by sscobra
The rear of the 05 looks just like the 69 in modern trim.
Yes, and that's because the design elements are all there. No weirdly contored taillight lenses, but rather 3-bar vertical tailights that are rectangular in shape. No weird bumper add-ons. No weird body lines to follow. Just classic Mustang styling.
Old 11/21/08, 09:19 PM
  #35  
Banned
 
Even Steven's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by topbliss
The more I look at the 2010, the more I like the S197's. THe 10's are too "Camaro like" for my taste. Yuk. Even steven is dead on....
Wait a sec... don't get me wrong here. I like the new 2010 overall. Sure, there are things I hate about it, but they are mostly things visible only in the back end. The front end looks decent to my eyes...the side profile is okay for the most part. But the back was a huge blunder for the following reasons:

1 - antenna in the back
2 - funky tailight shape
3 - black plastic diaper
4 - strange body angles - the shape of the back looks like someone hit the corners against a brick wall and bent them inward. The top of the bumper has some weird slopes to it. It even has a fairly steep rake that is unappealing to my eyes.
Old 11/21/08, 09:21 PM
  #36  
Banned
 
Even Steven's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TampaBear67
Tell Me ONE THING Steven, How Old Are You?

:
Are you suggesting that I'm posting under two different usernames? Because if you are, then you're dead wrong.
Old 11/21/08, 09:48 PM
  #37  
Bullitt Member
 
the procrastinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 17, 2008
Posts: 323
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MBK
the 05 looks more like the classic cars in those shots
I really thought Shawn made Steven's point with the first set of pix. Now he goes and does it again with the second batch.
Old 11/21/08, 09:53 PM
  #38  
Banned
 
Even Steven's Avatar
 
Join Date: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TampaBear67
GOD HELP THIS POOR BLIND CHILD.

You Wanna Talk About An UGLY A$$! I'll Take the Stang Any Day Over This Mess!

Gotta agree that the Camaro looks like complete crap from the rear in that picture. Wow, the back end is by far it's worse angle.
Old 11/21/08, 10:09 PM
  #39  
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
 
TampaBear67's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,725
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by DarkCandy08GT
Challenger has the only rear of the 3 that looks good!
Too bad the Challenger is Such A TANK! I Was sitting next to one in traffic the other day, Man that thing is HUGE! It made My 97 T-Bird Feel Absolutely Small. I mean the bottom of the side windows was half way up my side window.
Old 11/21/08, 10:22 PM
  #40  
Cobra R Member
Thread Starter
 
TampaBear67's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,725
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Even Steven
Are you suggesting that I'm posting under two different usernames? Because if you are, then you're dead wrong.
OMG! Where in the hell did that come from?

What I said was:
Originally Posted by TampaBear67
Tell Me ONE THING Steven, How Old Are You?
Where did you get the idea I thought you were posting under two user names? The thought never crossed my mind actually. But since you mentioned it, was that a Freudian Slip? Maybe You Really Are.

I asked your age because I just happen to have been around since the Late 60's, and all through the 7o's and Remember a Time when Imports Uncommon, with the exception of the VW Beetle. That Celica you keep mentioning was a Blatant Rip Off of the 69-70 Mustangs Styling, Thus making it one of the Best Looking Imports of that Era.


Quick Reply: 2010 Compared to 1969-70's



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 AM.