2010-2014 Mustang Information on The S197 {GenII}

2005-2010 Comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11/21/08 | 12:58 PM
  #61  
Even Steven's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sscobra
Comparing the changes between a 69-70 would be equal to comparing a 05 GT to a 07 GT500(same basic car just a new bumper and some trim). I realize the 2010 is on the same platform as the 2005 but the changes to the 2010 are very drastic and not really an slight progression in styling. IMO, I can dig 75% of the car. However, no matter how many cool shots I see of the front and side, I still know that ugly rear end is there. I just hope the aftermarket has a "good" fix for it.

The GT and GT500 are almost identical, other than some very small details. They look like the same year vehicles. The 69 and 70 Mustangs both look like Mustangs, but the front and back styling are different enough that anyone can easily distinguish between them with just a glance. I don't think the 2010 styling changes are any more drastic than the 69 to 70 changes, in my opinion.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:00 PM
  #62  
zzcoop's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Originally Posted by TampaBear67

Euro Look Bastardization?

Lets Just See about that comment of parking a 2010 Next to a 69-70 Mustang, Glory Days and All!


















I'm getting a little aroused.

Last edited by zzcoop; 11/21/08 at 01:01 PM.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:02 PM
  #63  
Even Steven's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
I appreciate the time and effort you put into your comparison pictures, but my opinion hasn't changed--the new 2010 lost the all-American look of the classic Mustangs in favor of a Euro version of the more modern Mustang. Yes, there is still a family resemblence, as there should be, but it definitely has a Euro flavor to it.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:08 PM
  #64  
zzcoop's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
The Mustang is no stranger to Euro flavor. Look at the Foxes.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:09 PM
  #65  
TampaBear67's Avatar
Thread Starter
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 1,725
Likes: 3
From: Florida
Someone Finally Said It! LOL

Last edited by TampaBear67; 11/21/08 at 01:10 PM.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:12 PM
  #66  
zzcoop's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Ooh! What do I win?!!
Old 11/21/08 | 01:19 PM
  #67  
sscobra's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 27, 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Even Steven
The GT and GT500 are almost identical, other than some very small details. They look like the same year vehicles. The 69 and 70 Mustangs both look like Mustangs, but the front and back styling are different enough that anyone can easily distinguish between them with just a glance. I don't think the 2010 styling changes are any more drastic than the 69 to 70 changes, in my opinion.

That's funny. The only real difference in the 69-70 are headlight buckets, no side scoopes on the qtr. panel of the 70(exact same panel as 69 boss 302) and the taillight "trim". "TRIM" not entire new sheet metal. Considering the 05 GT and 07 GT500 as almost identical and not the same about 69-70 is just ridiculous. Either way, it's not worth arguing over. The 2010 rear is horrible, plain and simple.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:21 PM
  #68  
Even Steven's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by zzcoop
The Mustang is no stranger to Euro flavor. Look at the Foxes.
The '87 GT is the first of the foxes that you can even remotely say that about. And even that is a stretch. I don't see much Euro flavor in the foxes, at least not nearly as much as I see in the 2010 Mustang.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:21 PM
  #69  
zzcoop's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Originally Posted by sscobra
The 2010 rear is awesome, plain and simple.
Fixed.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:22 PM
  #70  
zzcoop's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Originally Posted by Even Steven
The '87 GT is the first of the foxes that you can even remotely say that about. And even that is a stretch. I don't see much Euro flavor in the foxes, at least not nearly as much as I see in the 2010 Mustang.
You can't be serious!
Old 11/21/08 | 01:23 PM
  #71  
Even Steven's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by sscobra
That's funny. The only real difference in the 69-70 are headlight buckets, no side scoopes on the qtr. panel of the 70(exact same panel as 69 boss 302) and the taillight "trim". "TRIM" not entire new sheet metal. Considering the 05 GT and 07 GT500 as almost identical and not the same about 69-70 is just ridiculous. Either way, it's not worth arguing over. The 2010 rear is horrible, plain and simple.
The 69 and 70 taillights are completely different. One is convex and the other in concave. Gives a much different look to the rear of the car. But I agree that the rear of the 2010 is horrible. I've been saying that a lot lately and some members of this forum seem to be trying to change my mind.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:24 PM
  #72  
Even Steven's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by zzcoop
You can't be serious!
Absolutely serious. Go ahead and explain the European design elements in, say, an 86 GT. Or even an 87 LX 5.0L
Old 11/21/08 | 01:26 PM
  #73  
zzcoop's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Go clear back to the '82 GT, or the SVO… there's European flavor all over the Foxes, particularly the hatchback.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:27 PM
  #74  
FordBlueHeart's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 24, 2008
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: Traverse City
Originally Posted by Even Steven
The '87 GT is the first of the foxes that you can even remotely say that about. And even that is a stretch. I don't see much Euro flavor in the foxes, at least not nearly as much as I see in the 2010 Mustang.
I guess you completely forgot about the SVO?
Old 11/21/08 | 01:28 PM
  #75  
FordBlueHeart's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 24, 2008
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: Traverse City
delete
Old 11/21/08 | 01:28 PM
  #76  
zzcoop's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: September 22, 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: Kansas
Edited because Torr changed his post, therefore making mine look really stupid.

Last edited by zzcoop; 11/21/08 at 01:32 PM.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:31 PM
  #77  
sscobra's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: April 27, 2004
Posts: 551
Likes: 0
No matter how much I like the fox bodies. The simple fact is there is nothing "mustang" about them(besides V8s and cheap and easy car to mod). Hence the reason it says mustang on it at least four places on the outside. They could have very well called it an escort gt. Meaning based on styling alone, someone really could'nt say "hey that looks like a mustang". To me the best version of the fox was the 93 cobra, at least it had the pony in the grill. The mustang really didn't get back to it's roots until the 94 came along. Which is the first modern "retro" attempt at the original pony car. Also, I would say it is the best to date. In the fact that it has all the major styling points of it's heritage while not looking like a 64-70.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:36 PM
  #78  
Even Steven's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: October 29, 2008
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by FordBlueHeart
I guess you completely forgot about the SVO?
That's a good point. I wasn't thinking about the SVO. That was definitely a car that I could say had a bit more of a Euro look to it. Although I liked the SVO, the fact that it was set up more for handling and had a small turbo motor in it makes it a bit distanced from my idea of a true Mustang. I'm not saying the SVO wasn't a Mustang (we all know it was), but that it was a far cry from the traditional Mustangs as we all know them. That's why the SVO died after just a few years... nobody wanted to pay more for a Mustand with less straight line speed, even if it handled and stopped better.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:37 PM
  #79  
FordBlueHeart's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: July 24, 2008
Posts: 937
Likes: 0
From: Traverse City
Originally Posted by zzcoop
Edited because Torr changed his post, therefore making mine look really stupid.
Sorry, computer or operator screwing up.
Old 11/21/08 | 01:38 PM
  #80  
coldfsn66's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: July 4, 2008
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
I like the exterior revisions made to the Mustang for MY 2010 especially the "bulge" and cant of the hood, a-la
early 80's Aston Martin but I love the interior makeover, the Mustang finally has a cockpit befitting its iconic status. I realize that Jeremy Clarkson and co. at Top Gear and the like will remain disdainful of the Mustang and concept but I think Ford has done a masterful job of keeping the Mustang attainable and desirable. If I had the money I would not hesitate to order a 2010 GT!


Quick Reply: 2005-2010 Comparison



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:17 AM.