Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

UAW workers in Chicago reject Ford deal, strike possible

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 09:32 AM
  #21  
AlsCobra's Avatar
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 17,125
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by cdynaco

But Ford made GREAT business decisions... and ARE being hindered by union demands.
With GM & Chrysler getting the government teat and wiping out all their debt, that puts Ford fighting/competing with one arm tied behind their back - yet Ford was the responsible one - and continues to be responsible in paying down its (substantial) debt. Does that matter to these u hacks? Nope.

Right?
Ford did a good thing staying in and handling it on their own. But it's what got them in the position in the first place. I was with GM when they started shutting down production lines to build more full size SUV's. Chrysler and ford also followed somewhat. Then big oil went crazy and put a foot in all their asses. Don't remember what year that was. People quit buying due to fuel costs. Middle east troubles didnt help either. I don't think any of them really fully recovered after that. It just took a while for government buy out options. The US government made the better business decision. They could have done something about the oil crisis back then but let things play into their hands.

I personally just don't see the UAW holding them down. The pay and benefits they have have been going up progressively since the 70's along with vehicle costs and everything else. Just don't see how it's now a problem.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 10:01 AM
  #22  
ShaneGT's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2011
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 2
From: Houma, Louisiana
Originally Posted by AlsCobra
Nah. We still have the power. But the politicians down here are easily persuaded. We've got a plant in shreveport and from what I hear, those people who work there are worthless. But I'm guessing that's just UAW internal problem. The sad thing is that all unions are viewed to be the same and the UAW is the only one anybody knows anything about. The general public bases all of what they know about unions on the "black sheep" UAW.
what i mean is, Louisiana has a law on the books to protect buisiness, Right to fire law, regardless of union the employer has the right to fire a person for any reason that is legit(IE no discrimination, etc).

Toyota seems to be doing just fine with there union-less plants in the USA..
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 10:13 AM
  #23  
11SHELBYGT500's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: March 9, 2011
Posts: 16,242
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by ShaneGT

what i mean is, Louisiana has a law on the books to protect buisiness, Right to fire law, regardless of union the employer has the right to fire a person for any reason that is legit(IE no discrimination, etc).

Toyota seems to be doing just fine with there union-less plants in the USA..
Well of course. Just because someone is in a union doesn't give them free range. They have to follow the rules of the contract and that includes working as directed, but if you think management doesn't try to pull some BS you're crazy. I've had everything from time cards changed to management changing doctors injury reports and without a union, bye bye job and good luck in court. I guess you could just feel grateful that they paid you something and work injured. Some of you are mistaking the hourly wage with the wage + benefits estimate. It's a nice little trick the companies like to use to show how generous they are, but don't take into account the people who rarely use any benefits.

Last edited by 11SHELBYGT500; Oct 14, 2011 at 10:15 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 10:17 AM
  #24  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by AlsCobra
to build more full size SUV's. Chrysler and ford also followed somewhat.
That's what the consumer wanted. The companies didn't push SUV's on people. The companies responded to consumer demand. Even now, the Volt is way off target but SUV's & Crossovers still have a strong following. You build what the customer wants to buy.

Originally Posted by AlsCobra
I personally just don't see the UAW holding them down. The pay and benefits they have have been going up progressively since the 70's along with vehicle costs and everything else. Just don't see how it's now a problem.
Because there's no more money. Not now. Why do you think auto sales are so low compared to the peak years? Especially right now as the economy is still teetering on the brink with huge under-employment and even bigger unemployment.

In that single respect, "occupiers" have a point. Middle class/incomes have vanished. Who are these middle incomes of $200k Obama wants to tax?? $200k as middle class income??

But yet (the real) middle class are still supposed to shell out $30k for a new car or truck? Are you freaking kidding me? $30k??

Either union wages & union made products need to come down, or everybody elses wages needs to go up. But that can't happen with the economy in its present el stinko mode.

Last edited by cdynaco; Oct 14, 2011 at 10:21 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 10:25 AM
  #25  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by 11SHELBYGT500
Some of you are mistaking the hourly wage with the wage + benefits estimate. It's a nice little trick the companies like to use to show how generous they are, but don't take into account the people who rarely use any benefits.
There's no trick there. Everybody uses retirement at some point. And almost everybody uses health insurance at some point. It is a HUGE expense. Why do you think so many go without health insurance on their own? Many are just deadbeats that don't accept responsibility as an adult and will 'steal' from society using ER (but have cool TV's and nice Mustangs). But also because it is hugely expensive. And you want to suggest that its just a "nice little trick". Have you ever written those checks for your employees??

Last edited by cdynaco; Oct 14, 2011 at 10:26 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 10:33 AM
  #26  
11SHELBYGT500's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: March 9, 2011
Posts: 16,242
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by cdynaco

There's no trick there. Everybody uses retirement at some point. And almost everybody uses health insurance at some point. It is a HUGE expense. Why do you think so many go without health insurance on their own? Many are just deadbeats that don't accept responsibility as an adult and will 'steal' from society using ER (but have cool TV's and nice Mustangs). But also because it is hugely expensive. And you want to suggest that its just a "nice little trick". Have you ever written those checks for your employees??
You can't throw everyone in there. I've worked for Ups for 23 yrs and could probably count on both hands how many times I've used my medical benefits. Maybe "trick" was the wrong word, but I know I'm not getting all that I could.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 10:45 AM
  #27  
AlsCobra's Avatar
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 17,125
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
I agree with most of you statements Charlie. But NOBODY is gonna give up wages. Vehicle prices are not gonna go down. We are stuck in a big rut. Healthcare might help but not enough to make a difference. Quit moving business overseas and buy American sounds good to me but I doubt if that's gonna happen either. American businesses should amount to American money but that's just my opinion.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 10:50 AM
  #28  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by AlsCobra
I agree with most of you statements Charlie. But NOBODY is gonna give up wages. Vehicle prices are not gonna go down. We are stuck in a big rut. Healthcare might help but not enough to make a difference. Quit moving business overseas and buy American sounds good to me but I doubt if that's gonna happen either. American businesses should amount to American money but that's just my opinion.
I understand. Sadly, most American workers have given up compensation - if not directly, indirectly through no raises while inflation keeps compounding away. And I realize foreign cheap labor (who don't buy American products anywhere near what we buy from them) are the biggest cause of that - not the 'fat cat' bankers (as 'occupiers' allege).

But I do think in the current economy unions should moderate their 'demands'. They can be adjusted later when the economy is in full recovery. Which is why I still would be pushing for a profit sharing incentive over a silly one time 'signing' bonus.

Last edited by cdynaco; Oct 14, 2011 at 11:02 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 10:54 AM
  #29  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by 11SHELBYGT500
You can't throw everyone in there. I've worked for Ups for 23 yrs and could probably count on both hands how many times I've used my medical benefits. Maybe "trick" was the wrong word, but I know I'm not getting all that I could.
But that doesn't matter whether you've used them or not. It still costs to provide them. Heck it would cost even more if everyone was using them all the time.
Other than two workmans comp injuries (route job) that were not major, I had not used my health care benefits for illness for 10 yrs. Until that fateful day and it cost the company $30k. Boom! That gets averaged out across everybody.
I've done consulting work for a number of companies. Those health insurance benefits are a huge chunk out of the owners cash flow each month - whether their employees were using them or not. These were non-union companies that provided benefits to keep good employees. So the employees were being compensated with wages+bennies - out of the pockets of the owners - and ultimately out of the pockets of customers.

Last edited by cdynaco; Oct 14, 2011 at 10:58 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 10:57 AM
  #30  
AlsCobra's Avatar
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 17,125
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by cdynaco

I understand. Sadly, most American workers have given up compensation - if not directly, indirectly through no raises while inflation keeps compounding away.
Yeah what most people don't understand is that this $6k bonus is gonna end up a better deal for Ford. Keep wages where they are for 5 or 6 years.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 11:05 AM
  #31  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by AlsCobra
Yeah what most people don't understand is that this $6k bonus is gonna end up a better deal for Ford. Keep wages where they are for 5 or 6 years.

Which is why I still would be pushing for a profit sharing incentive over a silly one time 'signing' bonus. I like salary plus incentive. I have done my personal best in those arrangements - and so did the company. Gets everyone on the same page.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 11:22 AM
  #32  
AlsCobra's Avatar
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 17,125
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by cdynaco

Which is why I still would be pushing for a profit sharing incentive over a silly one time 'signing' bonus. I like salary plus incentive. I have done my personal best in those arrangements - and so did the company. Gets everyone on the same page.
Profit sharing won't work with this situation though. Ford would be able to drop their prices/sell more units/still not show a profit. The workers get the raw end of the deal. And no special performance incentives for individuals will fly because that type of mindset won't work with union employees. The Only hope is that the UAW really would make an effort to help the company profit but that's gonna lighten a few pockets for a while.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 11:45 AM
  #33  
cdynaco's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: December 14, 2007
Posts: 19,953
Likes: 4
From: State of Jefferson Mountains USA
Originally Posted by AlsCobra
And no special performance incentives for individuals will fly because that type of mindset won't work with union employees.
Well certainly it has to be structured correctly. No cooking the books to show lower profit. More like a salary + commission that sales people often have. Or salary + producution targets (with QC a factor) - with an incentive to be mindful/reduce costs/waste. Become partners - not adversaries.

As for mindset, they need to grow the eff up. Ford management, owners (shareholders), and everyone else in the real world - from small businesses to families to Ford customers - has to face reality. Every dang day.
What you just wrote is EXACTLY what pixxes people off. That somehow union employees get to be coddled and babied like the little puzzies they've become - while the rest of the world has to fight on the front lines while dragging these deadbeats on our sled. Little thumb sucking kindergartners expecting their teachers to give them blankies & milk & cookies & nappy time.

Yoda says "slugs you have become, yes".

Yep, you struck a nerve there. Just like a freakin' dentist. lol I literally felt my blood pressure spike. rofl

Last edited by cdynaco; Oct 14, 2011 at 11:48 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 11:50 AM
  #34  
ShaneGT's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2011
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 2
From: Houma, Louisiana
SO here is my question, where these plants are... if you work for the plant, are you forced to join the union as a package deal?
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 12:05 PM
  #35  
AlsCobra's Avatar
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 17,125
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by cdynaco

Well certainly it has to be structured correctly. No cooking the books to show lower profit. More like a salary + commission that sales people often have. Or salary + producution targets (with QC a factor) - with an incentive to be mindful/reduce costs/waste. Become partners - not adversaries.

As for mindset, they need to grow the eff up. Ford management, owners (shareholders), and everyone else in the real world - from small businesses to families to Ford customers - has to face reality. Every dang day.
What you just wrote is EXACTLY what pixxes people off. That somehow union employees get to be coddled and babied like the little puzzies they've become - while the rest of the world has to fight on the front lines while dragging these deadbeats on our sled. Little thumb sucking kindergartners expecting their teachers to give them blankies & milk & cookies & nappy time.

Yoda says "slugs you have become, yes".

Yep, you struck a nerve there. Just like a freakin' dentist. lol I literally felt my blood pressure spike. rofl
That's how I roll Charlie. Lol
But like I said, it's more UAW then all unions. There's some good and bad. The UAW just seems all bad. We are not all like this but yes there is an element of that in every union. Lazy crybabies being protected by the unions but things work themselves out. At least 25 people have been fired from here in the last 4 years and most of them had it coming. They are not untouchable but they will not be let go unjustly. We complain just as much as everyone else but we do have it pretty good.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 12:14 PM
  #36  
AlsCobra's Avatar
A Man Just Needs Some....
 
Joined: April 9, 2011
Posts: 17,125
Likes: 34
From: Louisiana
Originally Posted by ShaneGT
SO here is my question, where these plants are... if you work for the plant, are you forced to join the union as a package deal?
Nope. Not here at least. But it would not be wise. There is no special incentives to not join. Just not paying union dues and no chance of arbitration if disciplined unjustly. And if there is a lockout, those non/union guys are out too. And union workers have to train you on your job anyways. Just better to join even if you are somewhat against it. Union dues are tax deductible anyways.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 12:27 PM
  #37  
phiggs54's Avatar
 
Joined: May 27, 2011
Posts: 6,040
Likes: 20
From: Houston, TX
Originally Posted by AlsCobra

That's how I roll Charlie. Lol
But like I said, it's more UAW then all unions. There's some good and bad. The UAW just seems all bad. We are not all like this but yes there is an element of that in every union. Lazy crybabies.....
It is not just in the unions. I work for a small consulting company, ~150 people, employee owned subchapter S corp. We are very successful and everyone well compensated. But we still have slackers & whiners. Not too many but they are compensated just as well as everyone else and that doesnt stop the whining or make them more productive.

From my point of view it appears the union officials are mainly responsible for the bad perception of the public. Its not the workers that are doing the day to day. But you guys with experience feel free to correct me.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 01:17 PM
  #38  
Flagstang's Avatar
Spam Connoisseur
I got هَبوب‎ed
 
Joined: September 8, 2009
Posts: 9,651
Likes: 7
From: Sun City AZ
some companys like this one have a better answer

Our guiding principle of fairness and our fundamental beliefs in the long-term view and that we're all in the same boat underlie our total compensation strategy.

We strive to be internally fair and externally competitive. Unlike companies that base an employee's pay on the evaluations of one or two people—or on supervisors' opinions alone—Gore involves many associates in the process. To ensure that everyone is paid fairly, we ask associates to rank their team members each year in order of contribution to the enterprise. In addition to the numerical ranking, we invite comment on the rationale behind the ranking, as well as on particular strengths or potential areas of improvement for the associates on the list.

Of equal importance, we ensure that our pay is competitive by taking part in extensive benchmarking. Each year we compare the pay of Gore associates from varied functions and roles with their peers at other companies.

We are committed to long-term, sustainable business growth, and believe we are "all in the same boat" working towards that common goal. Our objective is to compensate associates based on their overall contribution to Gore.
http://www.gore.com/en_xx/careers/wh...pensation.html
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 01:41 PM
  #39  
ShaneGT's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: January 30, 2011
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 2
From: Houma, Louisiana
Originally Posted by AlsCobra
Nope. Not here at least. But it would not be wise. There is no special incentives to not join. Just not paying union dues and no chance of arbitration if disciplined unjustly. And if there is a lockout, those non/union guys are out too. And union workers have to train you on your job anyways. Just better to join even if you are somewhat against it. Union dues are tax deductible anyways.
well i know its not like that in Louisiana, due to laws.. i was wondering about up north..
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2011 | 01:50 PM
  #40  
UnrealFord's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: December 13, 2004
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 3
From: United States
Ford UAW reversing decision.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-1...tml?cmpid=yhoo
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM.