Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

Spied: 2008 Ford Freestyle

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 1/13/07, 07:29 PM
  #1  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Spied: 2008 Ford Freestyle

http://www.leftlanenews.com/2007/01/...ord-freestyle/

Old 1/13/07, 07:45 PM
  #2  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
Knight Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: April 13, 2006
Location: McAllen, Texas
Posts: 2,752
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i thought the freestyle was going to be discontinued
Old 1/13/07, 07:49 PM
  #3  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Okay, here is an obvious Fordism. The languishing Freestyle gets the Duratech 35 but the Escape doesn't??

VERY confused. Very.
Old 1/13/07, 08:08 PM
  #4  
Team Mustang Source
 
jsaylor's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,357
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 97svtgoin05gt
Okay, here is an obvious Fordism. The languishing Freestyle gets the Duratech 35 but the Escape doesn't??
VERY confused. Very.
Arguably the logic here is that the much larger Freestyle needs it more, no doubt because the 3.0L that seems okay in the Escape is horrible in the much larger, much heavier Freestyle. Also, the fact that the Freestyle is the squeaking wheel here means it was likely to get the grease.

The spy pics make this look much more like a Five Hundred wagon than the seperate model Ford has been trying to spin it as previously. Frankly, I think they'd be better off to merge the two nameplates anyway. It seems unlikely to vause any harm, but it could help somewhat by allowing them to combine sales figures for the two vehicles, and advertising for that matter.

It would also serve to cut down the perception that Ford has suv's coming out of the woodwork, making the lineup less confusing and creating good press. Frankly, it's a joke to call vehicles like these suv's anyway. Again, market it a version of the Five Hundred and spin this as an Outback/Cross Country style take on the same.
Old 1/13/07, 08:21 PM
  #5  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by jsaylor
Arguably the logic here is that the much larger Freestyle needs it more, no doubt because the 3.0L that seems okay in the Escape is horrible in the much larger, much heavier Freestyle. Also, the fact that the Freestyle is the squeaking wheel here means it was likely to get the grease.

The spy pics make this look much more like a Five Hundred wagon than the seperate model Ford has been trying to spin it as previously. Frankly, I think they'd be better off to merge the two nameplates anyway. It seems unlikely to vause any harm, but it could help somewhat by allowing them to combine sales figures for the two vehicles, and advertising for that matter.

It would also serve to cut down the perception that Ford has suv's coming out of the woodwork, making the lineup less confusing and creating good press. Frankly, it's a joke to call vehicles like these suv's anyway. Again, market it a version of the Five Hundred and spin this as an Outback/Cross Country style take on the same.
I won't disagree with you completely, however, with virtually ALL of the small SUVs out there sporting anywhere from 220hp to 270hp, the Escape is left to soldier on with 200hp. The only thing that will keep any sort of decent sales numbers up will be Ford loyalty and/or a significantly lower cost than the rest. I do not expect Ford to sell the Escape XLT with the v-6 for like $23,000. The new Hyundai Santa Fe has 263, the new Rav4 has like 250 (and probably advertising better mileage) and the small ones from DMC are slightly ahead with like 220 as I recall.
Old 1/13/07, 09:20 PM
  #6  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Isn't Santa Fe same class as Explorer? Mid-size SUV? Isn't Tuscon same class as Escape?

Some small SUV, like Honda CR-V, don't even offer V6.
Old 1/14/07, 10:11 AM
  #7  
Shelby GT500 Member
 
97svtgoin05gt's Avatar
 
Join Date: July 21, 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,924
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Red Star
Isn't Santa Fe same class as Explorer? Mid-size SUV? Isn't Tuscon same class as Escape?

Some small SUV, like Honda CR-V, don't even offer V6.
No, the Santa Fe is exactly the same size as the Escape. Not only that but the Santa Fe can be had for about $26,000. Even the least expensive Explorer will price out above that.

And correct, CR-V = no V-6. They can't put one in there cause they don't have a V-8 for the Pilot.
Old 1/14/07, 03:37 PM
  #8  
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
V10's Avatar
 
Join Date: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by 1969 Mustang Mach 1
i thought the freestyle was going to be discontinued
I think it's the Freestar that has been discontinued.

You bring up a good point, Ford has too many similar sounding model names so the average consumer doesn't have a clue what Ford is selling.

Ford's continued dropping of old names that have great consumer recognition (Taurus, Lincoln Continental, etc.), while they bring out new dumb model names with no brand name recognition (Freestar, Freestyle, MKZ, MKX, etc) is another of Ford's many problems.
Old 1/14/07, 04:26 PM
  #9  
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
Thread Starter
 
Zastava_101's Avatar
 
Join Date: January 30, 2004
Location: Wisconsin / Serbia
Posts: 12,630
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by V10
I think it's the Freestar that has been discontinued.

You bring up a good point, Ford has too many similar sounding model names so the average consumer doesn't have a clue what Ford is selling.

Ford's continued dropping of old names that have great consumer recognition (Taurus, Lincoln Continental, etc.), while they bring out new dumb model names with no brand name recognition (Freestar, Freestyle, MKZ, MKX, etc) is another of Ford's many problems.
Good point.
Ford pays a lot of attention to some models (F-Series, Mustang, Fusion) and they're very succesful and leaders in their classes. But Ford also completely ignores other vehicles (Freestar, Ranger, Taurus) and they fail (or will fail) on the market.

How can't they pay equal attention to all vehicles?
Old 1/15/07, 09:36 PM
  #10  
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Moosetang's Avatar
 
Join Date: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Freestar had no brand equity, are you kidding? The Aerostar and the Windstar were at one point profitable and competetive, but the Freestar was nothing but nailed to the showroom floor. They could have paid more attention to minivans as a segment, but the nameplate itself was dead. I'd rather they just move on with Fairlane/Explorer than try to delv back into the minivan brand pool.

I think paying attention equally to all vehicles is what a healthy company with a robust catalogue can do. Ford's none of the above, so they're hoping Ranger can hold on long enough for them to jump-start other parts of their lineup or keep the market-kleaders up top. It's not good, its just what it is.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JonathonK
GT350
6
9/17/15 10:13 AM
Thatkidtnau
2005-2009 Mustang
13
8/17/15 09:03 AM
GT/CS Guy
2005-2009 Mustang
4
8/13/15 07:54 PM
Smaxon
Which is Better
2
8/12/15 01:39 PM



Quick Reply: Spied: 2008 Ford Freestyle



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:00 PM.