Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

Mustang-based Interceptor Concept - FIRST PICS!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 3, 2007 | 11:38 PM
  #81  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Originally Posted by jsaylor
No matter how you look at it sales of the Charger were disappointing, but given it's status as a butch rebody at a discount rate this is hardly surprising.
114,201 sold units of $25,000-$40,000 full-size sedan is pretty high number.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 04:23 AM
  #82  
StangPro's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: November 15, 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
If the interceptor was offered as shown with AWD, I'd buy it today.

Ford currently has no product that I'd even consider viable for the money, outside of the Mustang.
They need something out there NOW that can compete with anyone.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 05:52 AM
  #83  
Cheese302's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: February 25, 2004
Posts: 1,796
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by instigator311
Considering they made the 427 just a few years ago, would they really waste all the time and money designing yet another V8 RWD Sedan so soon if they didn't have intentions of building it?

the 427 had a modular v-10 in it
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 04:43 PM
  #84  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Red Star
114,201 sold units of $25,000-$40,000 full-size sedan is pretty high number.
The numbers look good at a glance. But Chrysler has been heavily dependent upon fleet sales to move the Charger, much more dependent in fact than the surprisingly high 25% of overall sales they initially forecasted. Although it must be said that DCX has done a rather good job of keeping this quiet with virtually no solid numbers originating from within DCX, or most other sources for that matter. Rumours indicate the Charger may be over 50% fleet at this point, and given that the 300, which was supposed to have been spared the stigma of high-volume fleet sales by the Charger, moved past 25% sales to fleets well over a year ago this isn't difficult to believe.

Also, the Charger now starts closer to 21k than 25k as of the 2007my, with the previously fleet only 2.7L Charger now being offered to retail customers as well. No doubt this is one more attempt to move stagnant product on DCX's part. But the same isn't a really a surprise since Chrysler has been willing to sell PP Hemi models in the lower 20's to move product, and has even done so on relatively small orders (one or two cars), which could hardly be considered the norm for a vehicle in high demand.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #85  
05stangkc's Avatar
Administrator clevparts@aol.com
 
Joined: November 27, 2004
Posts: 12,584
Likes: 4,339
From: Visalia Ca.
I saw this basic Concept at a Dealer Training Meeting in Michigan in 99 , Except it was touted as the New Lincoln and had Suicide Doors. They had a lot of Big talk on how they were tired of Selling Lincolns to Customers who would not be around very long . They Said they were Looking for a Younger Market! And This Was on the way! What year is it again? The Grille Reminds me too Much of a Super Duty! Just Like Dodge and thier Cars Looking Like Their Trucks. I like the Basic Format Drivetrain wise but Lose the 300 Clues as much as possable. I am Just burnt out on the Look! They are EVERYWARE in my Area! just my 2 cents!

KC
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2007 | 02:15 PM
  #86  
Zastava_101's Avatar
TMS Post # 1,000,000
Serbian Steamer
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 12,636
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin / Serbia
Behind the curtain: Building the Ford Interceptor Concept


http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/05/b...eptor-concept/
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2007 | 02:23 PM
  #87  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by Red Star
Behind the curtain: Building the Ford Interceptor Concept


http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/05/b...eptor-concept/
Here's the direct link the USA Today article mentioned in your link.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2007 | 02:42 PM
  #88  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
This is interesting. The Car and Driver write up about the Interceptor says this in regards to the rear suspension:

Like the ‘Stang, the Interceptor rides on a double-wishbone front suspension, but ditches the Mustang’s live rear axle for a proper, multilink setup.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2007 | 04:45 PM
  #89  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
Yeah, there seems to be some confusion about which it really is.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2007 | 08:56 PM
  #90  
Tony Alonso's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: February 8, 2004
Posts: 3,399
Likes: 7
From: Cincinnati, OH
Originally Posted by TomServo92
This is interesting. The Car and Driver write up about the Interceptor says this in regards to the rear suspension:

Like the ‘Stang, the Interceptor rides on a double-wishbone front suspension, but ditches the Mustang’s live rear axle for a proper, multilink setup.
Given that the Mustang rides on a strut front suspension, I'd say that statement is incorrect on 2 counts!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 04:53 AM
  #91  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
Nice little article . .

http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/...ept-usat_x.htm
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 08:36 AM
  #92  
TomServo92's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: June 18, 2004
Posts: 3,990
Likes: 34
From: Conroe, TX
Originally Posted by Evil_Capri
That's the same one I posted above (#87).
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 08:44 AM
  #93  
Evil_Capri's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: February 3, 2004
Posts: 14,160
Likes: 73
I'm off my game . . .
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #94  
V10's Avatar
V10
Shelby GT350 Member
 
Joined: March 11, 2004
Posts: 2,146
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by jsaylor
The numbers look good at a glance. But Chrysler has been heavily dependent upon fleet sales to move the Charger, much more dependent in fact than the surprisingly high 25% of overall sales they initially forecasted. Although it must be said that DCX has done a rather good job of keeping this quiet with virtually no solid numbers originating from within DCX, or most other sources for that matter. Rumours indicate the Charger may be over 50% fleet at this point, and given that the 300, which was supposed to have been spared the stigma of high-volume fleet sales by the Charger, moved past 25% sales to fleets well over a year ago this isn't difficult to believe.

Also, the Charger now starts closer to 21k than 25k as of the 2007my, with the previously fleet only 2.7L Charger now being offered to retail customers as well. No doubt this is one more attempt to move stagnant product on DCX's part. But the same isn't a really a surprise since Chrysler has been willing to sell PP Hemi models in the lower 20's to move product, and has even done so on relatively small orders (one or two cars), which could hardly be considered the norm for a vehicle in high demand.
The bubble appears to have burst on the Chrysler 300, Charger & Magnum. The local dealers have too much inventory and it's not moving. They have many leftover 2006 cars.

Yesterday morning there was a Chrysler dealer video conference to run promotion ideas by the dealers. One of the proposals is a "Free Hemi" promotion. Another is $5K customer cash on the 300, Charger & Magnum (including Hemi models). There is $3K of dealer cash on the leftover 2006 300Cs right now. I don't have the link handy but more about this can be found @ Detriot News.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 04:42 PM
  #95  
mustang_sallad's Avatar
Cobra R Member
 
Joined: March 18, 2004
Posts: 1,502
Likes: 0
http://www.autoblog.com/2007/01/06/d...oncept-images/
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 05:51 PM
  #96  
Moosetang's Avatar
Tasca Super Boss 429 Member
 
Joined: February 1, 2004
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 0
Wierd Seats.
Interior's over the top, but I kinda like it.
Real front 3/4 shot looks better than artist's concept we saw earlier
Shaker Hood!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 08:53 PM
  #97  
Boomer's Avatar
I Have No Life
 
Joined: January 30, 2004
Posts: 10,446
Likes: 12
From: Canada
Is it just me or does that interior have an oldschool 70s-80s feel to it... but updated...

Like I'm thinking the late Ford LTDs etc
with the squircles in the guages ... and the dash...

Interesting look.

Like the 4 point seatbelts

interesting head rests
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 09:19 PM
  #98  
burningman's Avatar
Bow Chica Bow Wow
TMS Staff
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 7,446
Likes: 12
From: Proudly in NJ...bite it FL
That interior is 60's retro crazy cool but HOLY smoke that shaker set up is awesome..that would look fantastic turned around and changing a few angles of the opening on a stang

Heck maybe just leave the opening as is and turn it 180!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #99  
Hollywood_North GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Closet American
 
Joined: July 17, 2005
Posts: 5,851
Likes: 1
From: Vancouver, BC (Hollywood North)
The more I look at the Interceptor, the more it looks like a flight of fancy to me. I don't expect we'll ever see anything remotely like it on our roads.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2007 | 09:42 PM
  #100  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
Arin

loves

squircles
Reply



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:44 PM.