Ford Discussions Non-Mustang Ford Products

6.2L SVT Raptor power figures

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 06:51 PM
  #21  
tom281's Avatar
Legacy TMS Member
 
Joined: October 8, 2005
Posts: 12,395
Likes: 29
From: Medina county, OH
Originally Posted by 07S197
I hope so, Is the 6.2 not supposed to replace the V10?
I don't know.... someone here will know though.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 07:02 PM
  #22  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
Originally Posted by 07S197
I hope so, Is the 6.2 not supposed to replace the V10?
Originally Posted by tom281
I don't know.... someone here will know though.
There is no V10 in an F150 today anyway. The V10 was only ever a Super Duty motor. And yes I believe so. This new 6.2 can also be made larger because of the bore spacing.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 07:06 PM
  #23  
07S197's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Man Cans
 
Joined: August 20, 2007
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 2
From: Massachusetts
I knew that, I was just thinking F-Series as a whole.

I think the 4.6 is being replaced my an EB V6, the 5.4 replaced by the 5.0. Not sure that the 6.2 will make it in the F-150 in anything under a SE. Maybe a Harley Davidson Edition

I don't think we will see a NA V6 to replace the 4.2L unless they use a non EB like the 3.7 in the Taurus. I wonder if there will be an EB I4 to replace the 4.2L?

I think I have more questions than answers. Sorry for getting so off topic I'll shut it now.

Last edited by 07S197; Nov 3, 2009 at 07:10 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 07:16 PM
  #24  
Red Jay's Avatar
Cobra Member
 
Joined: September 9, 2009
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: Tulsa OK
Originally Posted by 07S197
I knew that, I was just thinking F-Series as a whole.

I think the 4.6 is being replaced my an EB V6, the 5.4 replaced by the 5.0. Not sure that the 6.2 will make it in the F-150 in anything under a SE. Maybe a Harley Davidson Edition

I don't think we will see a NA V6 to replace the 4.2L unless they use a non EB like the 3.7 in the Taurus. I wonder if there will be an EB I4 to replace the 4.2L?

I think I have more questions than answers. Sorry for getting so off topic I'll shut it now.
as long as thats not the case for the mustang its all good lol
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 07:19 PM
  #25  
2k7gtcs's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: October 9, 2007
Posts: 32,808
Likes: 163
Hopefully the F150 will see a good turbo diesel engine in the 4.2L range. Something with great torque and who cares about horsepower in a work truck. We need torqueseseses!
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 07:47 PM
  #26  
future9er24's Avatar
Post *****
 
Joined: May 13, 2004
Posts: 18,616
Likes: 3
From: Berkeley/Redwood City, CA
that'd be ideal
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 08:11 PM
  #27  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
Hopefully the F150 will see a good turbo diesel engine in the 4.2L range. Something with great torque and who cares about horsepower in a work truck. We need torqueseseses!
Rumors still say the diesel 4.4L V8 is on indefinite hold. Shame too.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #28  
07S197's Avatar
Swamp Donkey Man Cans
 
Joined: August 20, 2007
Posts: 4,367
Likes: 2
From: Massachusetts
Originally Posted by jsaylor
Rumors still say the diesel 4.4L V8 is on indefinite hold. Shame too.
Was that/is that used in the Range Rover's??
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 08:49 PM
  #29  
jsaylor's Avatar
Team Mustang Source
 
Joined: January 29, 2004
Posts: 2,358
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by 07S197
Was that/is that used in the Range Rover's??
No, there has long been a rumor that the 4.4L V8 slated for duty in the F-150 is a development of the Lion diesel used in the Range Rover, but the reality seems to be a relationship more akin to that of the Mod motor V8 and upcoming Coyote V8. Put more simply, the two engines are not really related at all, but some early confusion regarding this fact led many to believe otherwise.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 10:36 PM
  #30  
Slims00ls1z28's Avatar
Mach 1 Member
 
Joined: May 18, 2007
Posts: 830
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 2k7gtcs
I've seen statements that Ford's numbers are on 87 octane, while GM's are on 91 octane.

Ford's 6.2L Boss = 411hp, 434 torque, 87 octane, 9.8:1 compression
Chevy's 6.2L L92 = 403hp, 417 torque, 91 octane, 10.5:1 compression

Unverified
The L92 is an 87 octane tune despite the 10.5 compression wheras the LS3's 10.7 or 10.9 (depending on source) is the 91 octane tune. So Apples to apples the Ford 6.2 is beating the GM 6.2 power wise. The L92 in the trucks and (I'm sure the 6.2L Boss is the same way) also have manual fans which is another reason why the L92 is rated for less HP than the LS3 BTW. Same reason the TBSS's Identical LS2 is rated less in a Trailblazer. So remove the shaft fan, use a car designed intake, and 91 octane tune and it probably would go toe to toe with 435 HP LS3.

Last edited by Slims00ls1z28; Nov 5, 2009 at 11:13 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 10:46 PM
  #31  
hi5.0's Avatar
FR500 Member
 
Joined: August 15, 2005
Posts: 3,084
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Good #'s! Now bring on the DOHC 32V version!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rando
2010-2014 Mustang
8
Aug 25, 2021 11:12 AM
RCooke08GT
2005-2009 Mustang
9
Feb 19, 2017 03:03 AM
Fedupdave42169
2015 - 2023 MUSTANG
1
Oct 23, 2015 09:58 AM
austin101385
'10-14 Shelby Mustangs
3
Oct 2, 2015 01:00 PM
exgto
2012-2013 BOSS 302
5
Sep 28, 2015 07:39 PM




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:41 PM.